mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
synced 2024-12-22 11:03:16 +00:00
264 lines
10 KiB
Rust
264 lines
10 KiB
Rust
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
|
|
use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt;
|
|
use clippy_utils::ty::implements_trait;
|
|
use clippy_utils::{eq_expr_value, get_trait_def_id, trait_ref_of_method};
|
|
use clippy_utils::{higher, paths, sugg};
|
|
use if_chain::if_chain;
|
|
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
|
|
use rustc_hir as hir;
|
|
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{walk_expr, NestedVisitorMap, Visitor};
|
|
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
|
|
use rustc_middle::hir::map::Map;
|
|
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
|
|
|
|
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
|
/// **What it does:** Checks for `a = a op b` or `a = b commutative_op a`
|
|
/// patterns.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Why is this bad?** These can be written as the shorter `a op= b`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Known problems:** While forbidden by the spec, `OpAssign` traits may have
|
|
/// implementations that differ from the regular `Op` impl.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Example:**
|
|
/// ```rust
|
|
/// let mut a = 5;
|
|
/// let b = 0;
|
|
/// // ...
|
|
/// // Bad
|
|
/// a = a + b;
|
|
///
|
|
/// // Good
|
|
/// a += b;
|
|
/// ```
|
|
pub ASSIGN_OP_PATTERN,
|
|
style,
|
|
"assigning the result of an operation on a variable to that same variable"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
|
/// **What it does:** Checks for `a op= a op b` or `a op= b op a` patterns.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Why is this bad?** Most likely these are bugs where one meant to write `a
|
|
/// op= b`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Known problems:** Clippy cannot know for sure if `a op= a op b` should have
|
|
/// been `a = a op a op b` or `a = a op b`/`a op= b`. Therefore, it suggests both.
|
|
/// If `a op= a op b` is really the correct behaviour it should be
|
|
/// written as `a = a op a op b` as it's less confusing.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Example:**
|
|
/// ```rust
|
|
/// let mut a = 5;
|
|
/// let b = 2;
|
|
/// // ...
|
|
/// a += a + b;
|
|
/// ```
|
|
pub MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP,
|
|
complexity,
|
|
"having a variable on both sides of an assign op"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
declare_lint_pass!(AssignOps => [ASSIGN_OP_PATTERN, MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP]);
|
|
|
|
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for AssignOps {
|
|
#[allow(clippy::too_many_lines)]
|
|
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'_>) {
|
|
match &expr.kind {
|
|
hir::ExprKind::AssignOp(op, lhs, rhs) => {
|
|
if let hir::ExprKind::Binary(binop, l, r) = &rhs.kind {
|
|
if op.node != binop.node {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
// lhs op= l op r
|
|
if eq_expr_value(cx, lhs, l) {
|
|
lint_misrefactored_assign_op(cx, expr, *op, rhs, lhs, r);
|
|
}
|
|
// lhs op= l commutative_op r
|
|
if is_commutative(op.node) && eq_expr_value(cx, lhs, r) {
|
|
lint_misrefactored_assign_op(cx, expr, *op, rhs, lhs, l);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
hir::ExprKind::Assign(assignee, e, _) => {
|
|
if let hir::ExprKind::Binary(op, l, r) = &e.kind {
|
|
let lint = |assignee: &hir::Expr<'_>, rhs: &hir::Expr<'_>| {
|
|
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(assignee);
|
|
let rty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(rhs);
|
|
macro_rules! ops {
|
|
($op:expr,
|
|
$cx:expr,
|
|
$ty:expr,
|
|
$rty:expr,
|
|
$($trait_name:ident),+) => {
|
|
match $op {
|
|
$(hir::BinOpKind::$trait_name => {
|
|
let [krate, module] = paths::OPS_MODULE;
|
|
let path: [&str; 3] = [krate, module, concat!(stringify!($trait_name), "Assign")];
|
|
let trait_id = if let Some(trait_id) = get_trait_def_id($cx, &path) {
|
|
trait_id
|
|
} else {
|
|
return; // useless if the trait doesn't exist
|
|
};
|
|
// check that we are not inside an `impl AssignOp` of this exact operation
|
|
let parent_fn = cx.tcx.hir().get_parent_item(e.hir_id);
|
|
if_chain! {
|
|
if let Some(trait_ref) = trait_ref_of_method(cx, parent_fn);
|
|
if trait_ref.path.res.def_id() == trait_id;
|
|
then { return; }
|
|
}
|
|
implements_trait($cx, $ty, trait_id, &[$rty])
|
|
},)*
|
|
_ => false,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if ops!(
|
|
op.node,
|
|
cx,
|
|
ty,
|
|
rty.into(),
|
|
Add,
|
|
Sub,
|
|
Mul,
|
|
Div,
|
|
Rem,
|
|
And,
|
|
Or,
|
|
BitAnd,
|
|
BitOr,
|
|
BitXor,
|
|
Shr,
|
|
Shl
|
|
) {
|
|
span_lint_and_then(
|
|
cx,
|
|
ASSIGN_OP_PATTERN,
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
"manual implementation of an assign operation",
|
|
|diag| {
|
|
if let (Some(snip_a), Some(snip_r)) =
|
|
(snippet_opt(cx, assignee.span), snippet_opt(cx, rhs.span))
|
|
{
|
|
diag.span_suggestion(
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
"replace it with",
|
|
format!("{} {}= {}", snip_a, op.node.as_str(), snip_r),
|
|
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let mut visitor = ExprVisitor {
|
|
assignee,
|
|
counter: 0,
|
|
cx,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
walk_expr(&mut visitor, e);
|
|
|
|
if visitor.counter == 1 {
|
|
// a = a op b
|
|
if eq_expr_value(cx, assignee, l) {
|
|
lint(assignee, r);
|
|
}
|
|
// a = b commutative_op a
|
|
// Limited to primitive type as these ops are know to be commutative
|
|
if eq_expr_value(cx, assignee, r) && cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(assignee).is_primitive_ty() {
|
|
match op.node {
|
|
hir::BinOpKind::Add
|
|
| hir::BinOpKind::Mul
|
|
| hir::BinOpKind::And
|
|
| hir::BinOpKind::Or
|
|
| hir::BinOpKind::BitXor
|
|
| hir::BinOpKind::BitAnd
|
|
| hir::BinOpKind::BitOr => {
|
|
lint(assignee, l);
|
|
},
|
|
_ => {},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
_ => {},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn lint_misrefactored_assign_op(
|
|
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
|
|
expr: &hir::Expr<'_>,
|
|
op: hir::BinOp,
|
|
rhs: &hir::Expr<'_>,
|
|
assignee: &hir::Expr<'_>,
|
|
rhs_other: &hir::Expr<'_>,
|
|
) {
|
|
span_lint_and_then(
|
|
cx,
|
|
MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP,
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
"variable appears on both sides of an assignment operation",
|
|
|diag| {
|
|
if let (Some(snip_a), Some(snip_r)) = (snippet_opt(cx, assignee.span), snippet_opt(cx, rhs_other.span)) {
|
|
let a = &sugg::Sugg::hir(cx, assignee, "..");
|
|
let r = &sugg::Sugg::hir(cx, rhs, "..");
|
|
let long = format!("{} = {}", snip_a, sugg::make_binop(higher::binop(op.node), a, r));
|
|
diag.span_suggestion(
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
&format!(
|
|
"did you mean `{} = {} {} {}` or `{}`? Consider replacing it with",
|
|
snip_a,
|
|
snip_a,
|
|
op.node.as_str(),
|
|
snip_r,
|
|
long
|
|
),
|
|
format!("{} {}= {}", snip_a, op.node.as_str(), snip_r),
|
|
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
|
|
);
|
|
diag.span_suggestion(
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
"or",
|
|
long,
|
|
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, // snippet
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
fn is_commutative(op: hir::BinOpKind) -> bool {
|
|
use rustc_hir::BinOpKind::{
|
|
Add, And, BitAnd, BitOr, BitXor, Div, Eq, Ge, Gt, Le, Lt, Mul, Ne, Or, Rem, Shl, Shr, Sub,
|
|
};
|
|
match op {
|
|
Add | Mul | And | Or | BitXor | BitAnd | BitOr | Eq | Ne => true,
|
|
Sub | Div | Rem | Shl | Shr | Lt | Le | Ge | Gt => false,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct ExprVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|
assignee: &'a hir::Expr<'a>,
|
|
counter: u8,
|
|
cx: &'a LateContext<'tcx>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for ExprVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|
type Map = Map<'tcx>;
|
|
|
|
fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'_>) {
|
|
if eq_expr_value(self.cx, self.assignee, expr) {
|
|
self.counter += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
walk_expr(self, expr);
|
|
}
|
|
fn nested_visit_map(&mut self) -> NestedVisitorMap<Self::Map> {
|
|
NestedVisitorMap::None
|
|
}
|
|
}
|