mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
synced 2024-11-16 01:38:09 +00:00
86 lines
3.5 KiB
Text
86 lines
3.5 KiB
Text
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:34:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
|
|
|
|
|
note: lint level defined here
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:3:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:21
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:48:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:59:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:60:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 13 previous errors
|
|
|