rust-clippy/clippy_lints/src/assertions_on_result_states.rs
Kevin Reid 0f5338cd90 For restriction lints, replace “Why is this bad?” with “Why restrict this?”
The `restriction` group contains many lints which are not about
necessarily “bad” things, but style choices — perhaps even style choices
which contradict conventional Rust style — or are otherwise very
situational. This results in silly wording like “Why is this bad?
It isn't, but ...”, which I’ve seen confuse a newcomer at least once.

To improve this situation, this commit replaces the “Why is this bad?”
section heading with “Why restrict this?”, for most, but not all,
restriction lints. I left alone the ones whose placement in the
restriction group is more incidental.

In order to make this make sense, I had to remove the “It isn't, but”
texts from the contents of the sections. Sometimes further changes
were needed, or there were obvious fixes to make, and I went ahead
and made those changes without attempting to split them into another
commit, even though many of them are not strictly necessary for the
“Why restrict this?” project.
2024-05-23 15:51:33 -07:00

110 lines
4.4 KiB
Rust
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_sugg;
use clippy_utils::macros::{find_assert_args, root_macro_call_first_node, PanicExpn};
use clippy_utils::source::snippet_with_context;
use clippy_utils::ty::{has_debug_impl, is_copy, is_type_diagnostic_item};
use clippy_utils::usage::local_used_after_expr;
use clippy_utils::{is_expr_final_block_expr, path_res};
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir::def::Res;
use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty};
use rustc_session::declare_lint_pass;
use rustc_span::sym;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for `assert!(r.is_ok())` or `assert!(r.is_err())` calls.
///
/// ### Why restrict this?
/// This form of assertion does not show any of the information present in the `Result`
/// other than which variant it isnt.
///
/// ### Known problems
/// The suggested replacement decreases the readability of code and log output.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust,no_run
/// # let r = Ok::<_, ()>(());
/// assert!(r.is_ok());
/// # let r = Err::<(), _>(());
/// assert!(r.is_err());
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
///
/// ```rust,no_run
/// # let r = Ok::<_, ()>(());
/// r.unwrap();
/// # let r = Err::<(), _>(());
/// r.unwrap_err();
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.64.0"]
pub ASSERTIONS_ON_RESULT_STATES,
restriction,
"`assert!(r.is_ok())` or `assert!(r.is_err())` gives worse panic messages than directly calling `r.unwrap()` or `r.unwrap_err()`"
}
declare_lint_pass!(AssertionsOnResultStates => [ASSERTIONS_ON_RESULT_STATES]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for AssertionsOnResultStates {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, e: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
if let Some(macro_call) = root_macro_call_first_node(cx, e)
&& matches!(cx.tcx.get_diagnostic_name(macro_call.def_id), Some(sym::assert_macro))
&& let Some((condition, panic_expn)) = find_assert_args(cx, e, macro_call.expn)
&& matches!(panic_expn, PanicExpn::Empty)
&& let ExprKind::MethodCall(method_segment, recv, [], _) = condition.kind
&& let result_type_with_refs = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(recv)
&& let result_type = result_type_with_refs.peel_refs()
&& is_type_diagnostic_item(cx, result_type, sym::Result)
&& let ty::Adt(_, args) = result_type.kind()
{
if !is_copy(cx, result_type) {
if result_type_with_refs != result_type {
return;
} else if let Res::Local(binding_id) = path_res(cx, recv)
&& local_used_after_expr(cx, binding_id, recv)
{
return;
}
}
let semicolon = if is_expr_final_block_expr(cx.tcx, e) { ";" } else { "" };
let mut app = Applicability::MachineApplicable;
match method_segment.ident.as_str() {
"is_ok" if type_suitable_to_unwrap(cx, args.type_at(1)) => {
span_lint_and_sugg(
cx,
ASSERTIONS_ON_RESULT_STATES,
macro_call.span,
"called `assert!` with `Result::is_ok`",
"replace with",
format!(
"{}.unwrap(){semicolon}",
snippet_with_context(cx, recv.span, condition.span.ctxt(), "..", &mut app).0
),
app,
);
},
"is_err" if type_suitable_to_unwrap(cx, args.type_at(0)) => {
span_lint_and_sugg(
cx,
ASSERTIONS_ON_RESULT_STATES,
macro_call.span,
"called `assert!` with `Result::is_err`",
"replace with",
format!(
"{}.unwrap_err(){semicolon}",
snippet_with_context(cx, recv.span, condition.span.ctxt(), "..", &mut app).0
),
app,
);
},
_ => (),
};
}
}
}
fn type_suitable_to_unwrap<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
has_debug_impl(cx, ty) && !ty.is_unit() && !ty.is_never()
}