mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
synced 2024-11-10 15:14:29 +00:00
74 lines
3.1 KiB
Text
74 lines
3.1 KiB
Text
error: consider using an `AtomicBool` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:8:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(true);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: `-D clippy::mutex-atomic` implied by `-D warnings`
|
|
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::mutex_atomic)]`
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicUsize` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:11:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(5usize);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicIsize` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:13:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(9isize);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:16:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(&x as *const u32);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:18:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(&mut x as *mut u32);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicU32` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:20:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(0u32);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: `-D clippy::mutex-integer` implied by `-D warnings`
|
|
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::mutex_integer)]`
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicI32` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:23:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(0i32);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicU8` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:26:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(0u8);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicI16` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:28:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(0i16);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicI8` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:30:25
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _x: Mutex<i8> = Mutex::new(0);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: consider using an `AtomicI64` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
|
|
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:33:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | Mutex::new(X);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 11 previous errors
|
|
|