mod builtin_type_shadow; mod double_neg; mod literal_suffix; mod mixed_case_hex_literals; mod redundant_pattern; mod unneeded_field_pattern; mod unneeded_wildcard_pattern; mod zero_prefixed_literal; use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint; use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt; use rustc_ast::ast::{Expr, ExprKind, Generics, LitFloatType, LitIntType, LitKind, NodeId, Pat, PatKind}; use rustc_ast::token; use rustc_ast::visit::FnKind; use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap; use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass, LintContext}; use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro; use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; use rustc_span::source_map::Span; declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Checks for structure field patterns bound to wildcards. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// Using `..` instead is shorter and leaves the focus on /// the fields that are actually bound. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// # struct Foo { /// # a: i32, /// # b: i32, /// # c: i32, /// # } /// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 }; /// /// match f { /// Foo { a: _, b: 0, .. } => {}, /// Foo { a: _, b: _, c: _ } => {}, /// } /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// # struct Foo { /// # a: i32, /// # b: i32, /// # c: i32, /// # } /// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 }; /// /// match f { /// Foo { b: 0, .. } => {}, /// Foo { .. } => {}, /// } /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN, restriction, "struct fields bound to a wildcard instead of using `..`" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Checks for function arguments having the similar names /// differing by an underscore. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// It affects code readability. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// fn foo(a: i32, _a: i32) {} /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// fn bar(a: i32, _b: i32) {} /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT, style, "function arguments having names which only differ by an underscore" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Detects expressions of the form `--x`. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// It can mislead C/C++ programmers to think `x` was /// decremented. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// let mut x = 3; /// --x; /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub DOUBLE_NEG, style, "`--x`, which is a double negation of `x` and not a pre-decrement as in C/C++" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Warns on hexadecimal literals with mixed-case letter /// digits. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// It looks confusing. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// # let _ = /// 0x1a9BAcD /// # ; /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// # let _ = /// 0x1A9BACD /// # ; /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub MIXED_CASE_HEX_LITERALS, style, "hex literals whose letter digits are not consistently upper- or lowercased" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Warns if literal suffixes are not separated by an /// underscore. /// To enforce unseparated literal suffix style, /// see the `separated_literal_suffix` lint. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// Suffix style should be consistent. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// # let _ = /// 123832i32 /// # ; /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// # let _ = /// 123832_i32 /// # ; /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub UNSEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX, restriction, "literals whose suffix is not separated by an underscore" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Warns if literal suffixes are separated by an underscore. /// To enforce separated literal suffix style, /// see the `unseparated_literal_suffix` lint. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// Suffix style should be consistent. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// # let _ = /// 123832_i32 /// # ; /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// # let _ = /// 123832i32 /// # ; /// ``` #[clippy::version = "1.58.0"] pub SEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX, restriction, "literals whose suffix is separated by an underscore" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Warns if an integral constant literal starts with `0`. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// In some languages (including the infamous C language /// and most of its /// family), this marks an octal constant. In Rust however, this is a decimal /// constant. This could /// be confusing for both the writer and a reader of the constant. /// /// ### Example /// /// In Rust: /// ```rust /// fn main() { /// let a = 0123; /// println!("{}", a); /// } /// ``` /// /// prints `123`, while in C: /// /// ```c /// #include /// /// int main() { /// int a = 0123; /// printf("%d\n", a); /// } /// ``` /// /// prints `83` (as `83 == 0o123` while `123 == 0o173`). #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub ZERO_PREFIXED_LITERAL, complexity, "integer literals starting with `0`" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Warns if a generic shadows a built-in type. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// This gives surprising type errors. /// /// ### Example /// /// ```ignore /// impl Foo { /// fn impl_func(&self) -> u32 { /// 42 /// } /// } /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub BUILTIN_TYPE_SHADOW, style, "shadowing a builtin type" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Checks for patterns in the form `name @ _`. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// It's almost always more readable to just use direct /// bindings. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// # let v = Some("abc"); /// match v { /// Some(x) => (), /// y @ _ => (), /// } /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// # let v = Some("abc"); /// match v { /// Some(x) => (), /// y => (), /// } /// ``` #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"] pub REDUNDANT_PATTERN, style, "using `name @ _` in a pattern" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// ### What it does /// Checks for tuple patterns with a wildcard /// pattern (`_`) is next to a rest pattern (`..`). /// /// _NOTE_: While `_, ..` means there is at least one element left, `..` /// means there are 0 or more elements left. This can make a difference /// when refactoring, but shouldn't result in errors in the refactored code, /// since the wildcard pattern isn't used anyway. /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// The wildcard pattern is unneeded as the rest pattern /// can match that element as well. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust /// # struct TupleStruct(u32, u32, u32); /// # let t = TupleStruct(1, 2, 3); /// match t { /// TupleStruct(0, .., _) => (), /// _ => (), /// } /// ``` /// /// Use instead: /// ```rust /// # struct TupleStruct(u32, u32, u32); /// # let t = TupleStruct(1, 2, 3); /// match t { /// TupleStruct(0, ..) => (), /// _ => (), /// } /// ``` #[clippy::version = "1.40.0"] pub UNNEEDED_WILDCARD_PATTERN, complexity, "tuple patterns with a wildcard pattern (`_`) is next to a rest pattern (`..`)" } declare_lint_pass!(MiscEarlyLints => [ UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN, DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT, DOUBLE_NEG, MIXED_CASE_HEX_LITERALS, UNSEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX, SEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX, ZERO_PREFIXED_LITERAL, BUILTIN_TYPE_SHADOW, REDUNDANT_PATTERN, UNNEEDED_WILDCARD_PATTERN, ]); impl EarlyLintPass for MiscEarlyLints { fn check_generics(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, gen: &Generics) { for param in &gen.params { builtin_type_shadow::check(cx, param); } } fn check_pat(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, pat: &Pat) { unneeded_field_pattern::check(cx, pat); redundant_pattern::check(cx, pat); unneeded_wildcard_pattern::check(cx, pat); } fn check_fn(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, fn_kind: FnKind<'_>, _: Span, _: NodeId) { let mut registered_names: FxHashMap = FxHashMap::default(); for arg in &fn_kind.decl().inputs { if let PatKind::Ident(_, ident, None) = arg.pat.kind { let arg_name = ident.to_string(); if let Some(arg_name) = arg_name.strip_prefix('_') { if let Some(correspondence) = registered_names.get(arg_name) { span_lint( cx, DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT, *correspondence, &format!( "`{arg_name}` already exists, having another argument having almost the same \ name makes code comprehension and documentation more difficult" ), ); } } else { registered_names.insert(arg_name, arg.pat.span); } } } } fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, expr: &Expr) { if in_external_macro(cx.sess(), expr.span) { return; } if let ExprKind::Lit(lit) = expr.kind { MiscEarlyLints::check_lit(cx, lit, expr.span); } double_neg::check(cx, expr); } } impl MiscEarlyLints { fn check_lit(cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, lit: token::Lit, span: Span) { // We test if first character in snippet is a number, because the snippet could be an expansion // from a built-in macro like `line!()` or a proc-macro like `#[wasm_bindgen]`. // Note that this check also covers special case that `line!()` is eagerly expanded by compiler. // See for a regression. // FIXME: Find a better way to detect those cases. let lit_snip = match snippet_opt(cx, span) { Some(snip) if snip.chars().next().map_or(false, |c| c.is_ascii_digit()) => snip, _ => return, }; let lit_kind = LitKind::from_token_lit(lit); if let Ok(LitKind::Int(value, lit_int_type)) = lit_kind { let suffix = match lit_int_type { LitIntType::Signed(ty) => ty.name_str(), LitIntType::Unsigned(ty) => ty.name_str(), LitIntType::Unsuffixed => "", }; literal_suffix::check(cx, span, &lit_snip, suffix, "integer"); if lit_snip.starts_with("0x") { mixed_case_hex_literals::check(cx, span, suffix, &lit_snip); } else if lit_snip.starts_with("0b") || lit_snip.starts_with("0o") { // nothing to do } else if value != 0 && lit_snip.starts_with('0') { zero_prefixed_literal::check(cx, span, &lit_snip); } } else if let Ok(LitKind::Float(_, LitFloatType::Suffixed(float_ty))) = lit_kind { let suffix = float_ty.name_str(); literal_suffix::check(cx, span, &lit_snip, suffix, "float"); } } }