use if_chain::if_chain; use rustc::hir; use rustc::hir::intravisit::{walk_expr, NestedVisitorMap, Visitor}; use rustc::lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintArray, LintPass}; use rustc::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; use rustc_errors::Applicability; use crate::utils::{ get_trait_def_id, implements_trait, snippet_opt, span_lint_and_then, trait_ref_of_method, SpanlessEq, }; use crate::utils::{higher, sugg}; use syntax::symbol::Symbol; declare_clippy_lint! { /// **What it does:** Checks for `a = a op b` or `a = b commutative_op a` /// patterns. /// /// **Why is this bad?** These can be written as the shorter `a op= b`. /// /// **Known problems:** While forbidden by the spec, `OpAssign` traits may have /// implementations that differ from the regular `Op` impl. /// /// **Example:** /// ```rust /// let mut a = 5; /// let b = 0; /// // ... /// a = a + b; /// ``` pub ASSIGN_OP_PATTERN, style, "assigning the result of an operation on a variable to that same variable" } declare_clippy_lint! { /// **What it does:** Checks for `a op= a op b` or `a op= b op a` patterns. /// /// **Why is this bad?** Most likely these are bugs where one meant to write `a /// op= b`. /// /// **Known problems:** Clippy cannot know for sure if `a op= a op b` should have /// been `a = a op a op b` or `a = a op b`/`a op= b`. Therefore, it suggests both. /// If `a op= a op b` is really the correct behaviour it should be /// written as `a = a op a op b` as it's less confusing. /// /// **Example:** /// ```rust /// let mut a = 5; /// ... /// a += a + b; /// ``` pub MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP, complexity, "having a variable on both sides of an assign op" } declare_lint_pass!(AssignOps => [ASSIGN_OP_PATTERN, MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP]); impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for AssignOps { #[allow(clippy::too_many_lines)] fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr) { match &expr.node { hir::ExprKind::AssignOp(op, lhs, rhs) => { if let hir::ExprKind::Binary(binop, l, r) = &rhs.node { if op.node != binop.node { return; } // lhs op= l op r if SpanlessEq::new(cx).ignore_fn().eq_expr(lhs, l) { lint_misrefactored_assign_op(cx, expr, *op, rhs, lhs, r); } // lhs op= l commutative_op r if is_commutative(op.node) && SpanlessEq::new(cx).ignore_fn().eq_expr(lhs, r) { lint_misrefactored_assign_op(cx, expr, *op, rhs, lhs, l); } } }, hir::ExprKind::Assign(assignee, e) => { if let hir::ExprKind::Binary(op, l, r) = &e.node { #[allow(clippy::cognitive_complexity)] let lint = |assignee: &hir::Expr, rhs: &hir::Expr| { let ty = cx.tables.expr_ty(assignee); let rty = cx.tables.expr_ty(rhs); macro_rules! ops { ($op:expr, $cx:expr, $ty:expr, $rty:expr, $($trait_name:ident),+) => { match $op { $(hir::BinOpKind::$trait_name => { let [krate, module] = *crate::utils::paths::OPS_MODULE; let ident = { *crate::utils::sym::assign::$trait_name }; let path: [Symbol; 3] = [krate, module, ident]; let trait_id = if let Some(trait_id) = get_trait_def_id($cx, &path) { trait_id } else { return; // useless if the trait doesn't exist }; // check that we are not inside an `impl AssignOp` of this exact operation let parent_fn = cx.tcx.hir().get_parent_item(e.hir_id); if_chain! { if let Some(trait_ref) = trait_ref_of_method(cx, parent_fn); if trait_ref.path.res.def_id() == trait_id; then { return; } } implements_trait($cx, $ty, trait_id, &[$rty]) },)* _ => false, } } } if ops!( op.node, cx, ty, rty.into(), Add, Sub, Mul, Div, Rem, And, Or, BitAnd, BitOr, BitXor, Shr, Shl ) { span_lint_and_then( cx, ASSIGN_OP_PATTERN, expr.span, "manual implementation of an assign operation", |db| { if let (Some(snip_a), Some(snip_r)) = (snippet_opt(cx, assignee.span), snippet_opt(cx, rhs.span)) { db.span_suggestion( expr.span, "replace it with", format!("{} {}= {}", snip_a, op.node.as_str(), snip_r), Applicability::MachineApplicable, ); } }, ); } }; let mut visitor = ExprVisitor { assignee, counter: 0, cx, }; walk_expr(&mut visitor, e); if visitor.counter == 1 { // a = a op b if SpanlessEq::new(cx).ignore_fn().eq_expr(assignee, l) { lint(assignee, r); } // a = b commutative_op a // Limited to primitive type as these ops are know to be commutative if SpanlessEq::new(cx).ignore_fn().eq_expr(assignee, r) && cx.tables.expr_ty(assignee).is_primitive_ty() { match op.node { hir::BinOpKind::Add | hir::BinOpKind::Mul | hir::BinOpKind::And | hir::BinOpKind::Or | hir::BinOpKind::BitXor | hir::BinOpKind::BitAnd | hir::BinOpKind::BitOr => { lint(assignee, l); }, _ => {}, } } } } }, _ => {}, } } } fn lint_misrefactored_assign_op( cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, expr: &hir::Expr, op: hir::BinOp, rhs: &hir::Expr, assignee: &hir::Expr, rhs_other: &hir::Expr, ) { span_lint_and_then( cx, MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP, expr.span, "variable appears on both sides of an assignment operation", |db| { if let (Some(snip_a), Some(snip_r)) = (snippet_opt(cx, assignee.span), snippet_opt(cx, rhs_other.span)) { let a = &sugg::Sugg::hir(cx, assignee, ".."); let r = &sugg::Sugg::hir(cx, rhs, ".."); let long = format!("{} = {}", snip_a, sugg::make_binop(higher::binop(op.node), a, r)); db.span_suggestion( expr.span, &format!( "Did you mean {} = {} {} {} or {}? Consider replacing it with", snip_a, snip_a, op.node.as_str(), snip_r, long ), format!("{} {}= {}", snip_a, op.node.as_str(), snip_r), Applicability::MachineApplicable, ); db.span_suggestion( expr.span, "or", long, Applicability::MachineApplicable, // snippet ); } }, ); } fn is_commutative(op: hir::BinOpKind) -> bool { use rustc::hir::BinOpKind::*; match op { Add | Mul | And | Or | BitXor | BitAnd | BitOr | Eq | Ne => true, Sub | Div | Rem | Shl | Shr | Lt | Le | Ge | Gt => false, } } struct ExprVisitor<'a, 'tcx: 'a> { assignee: &'a hir::Expr, counter: u8, cx: &'a LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, } impl<'a, 'tcx: 'a> Visitor<'tcx> for ExprVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr) { if SpanlessEq::new(self.cx).ignore_fn().eq_expr(self.assignee, expr) { self.counter += 1; } walk_expr(self, expr); } fn nested_visit_map<'this>(&'this mut self) -> NestedVisitorMap<'this, 'tcx> { NestedVisitorMap::None } }