Replace `#[allow]` with `#[expect]` in Clippy
Hey `@rust-lang/clippy,` `@Alexendoo,` `@dswij,` I'm currently working on the expect attribute as defined in [Rust RFC 2383](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2383-lint-reasons.html). With that, an `#[allow]` attribute can be replaced with a `#[expect]` attribute that suppresses the lint, but also emits a warning, if the lint isn't emitted in the expected scope.
With this PR I would like to test the attribute on a project scale and Clippy obviously came to mind. This PR replaces (almost) all `#[allow]` attributes in `clippy_utils` and `clippy_lints` with the `#[expect]` attribute. I was also able to remove some allows since, the related FPs have been fixed 🎉.
My question is now, are there any concerns regarding this? It's still okay to add normal `#[allow]` attributes, I see the need to nit-pick about that in new PRs, unless it's actually a FP. Also, I would not recommend using `#[expect]` in tests, as changes to a lint could the trigger the expect attribute in other files.
Additionally, I've noticed that Clippy has a bunch of `#[allow(clippy::too_many_lines)]` attributes. Should we maybe allow the lint all together or increase the threshold setting? To me, it seems like we mostly just ignore it in our code. 😅🙃
---
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995` (I've requested you for now, since you're also helping with reviewing the expect implementation. You are welcome to delegate this PR, even if it should be a simple review 🙃 )
Track if a where bound comes from a impl Trait desugar
With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93803 `impl Trait` function arguments get desugared to hidden where bounds. However, Clippy needs to know if a bound was originally a `impl Trait` or an actual bound. This adds a field to the `WhereBoundPredicate` struct to keep track of this information during AST->HIR lowering.
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@estebank` (as the reviewer of #93803)
Create clippy lint against unexpectedly late drop for temporaries in match scrutinee expressions
A new clippy lint for issue 93883 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93883). Relies on a new trait in `marker` (called `SignificantDrop` to enable linting), which is why this PR is for the rust-lang repo and not the clippy repo.
changelog: new lint [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]
With #93803 `impl Trait` function arguments get desugared to hidden
where bounds. However, Clippy needs to know if a bound was originally a
impl Trait or an actual bound. This adds a field to the
`WhereBoundPredicate` struct to keep track of this information during
HIR lowering.
Address `unnecessary_to_owned` false positive
My proposed fix for #8759 is to revise the conditions that delineate `redundant_clone` and `unnecessary_to_owned`:
```rust
// Only flag cases satisfying at least one of the following three conditions:
// * the referent and receiver types are distinct
// * the referent/receiver type is a copyable array
// * the method is `Cow::into_owned`
// This restriction is to ensure there is no overlap between `redundant_clone` and this
// lint. It also avoids the following false positive:
// https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8759
// Arrays are a bit of a corner case. Non-copyable arrays are handled by
// `redundant_clone`, but copyable arrays are not.
```
This change causes a few cases that were previously flagged by `unnecessary_to_owned` to no longer be flagged. But one could argue those cases would be better handled by `redundant_clone`.
Closes#8759
changelog: none
Support negative ints in manual_range_contains
fixes: #8721
changelog: Fixes issue where ranges containing ints with different signs would be
incorrect due to comparing as unsigned.
Fix `cast_lossless` to avoid warning on `usize` to `f64` conversion.
Previously, the `cast_lossless` lint would issue a warning on code that
converted a `usize` value to `f64`, on 32-bit targets.
`usize` to `f64` is a lossless cast on 32-bit targets, however there is
no corresponding `f64::from` that takes a `usize`, so `cast_lossless`'s
suggested replacement does not compile.
This PR disables the lint in the case of casting from `usize` or `isize`.
Fixes#3689.
changelog: [`cast_lossless`] no longer gives wrong suggestion on usize,isize->f64
Lint `empty_lint_after_outer_attr` on argumentless macros
Reverts the change from 034c81b761 as it's no longer needed. The test is left just in case. Original issue is #2475.
changelog: Lint `empty_lint_after_outer_attr` on argumentless macros again
Those lints are trait_duplication_in_bounds and
type_repetition_in_bounds. I don't think those can be fixed on the
Clippy side alone, but need changes in the compiler. So let's move them
to nursery to get the sync through and then fix them on the rustc side.
Also adds a regression test that has to be fixed before they can be
moved back to pedantic.
Easier readability for `needless_late_init` message
Closes#8530
Updated the lint to use a `MultiSpan`, showing where the `let` statement was first used and where the initialisation statement was done, as in the format described, for easier readability.
Was wondering why, when pushing the span label for the initialisation statement, that sometimes the prior statement above the initialisation statement gets pulled into the output as well - any insight is appreciated!
---
changelog: [`needless_late_init`]: Now shows the `let` statement where it was first initialized
[FP] identity_op in front of if
fix#8724
changelog: FP: [`identity_op`]: is now allowed in front of if statements, blocks and other expressions where the suggestion would be invalid.
Resolved simular problems with blocks, mathces, and loops.
identity_op always does NOT suggest reducing `0 + if b { 1 } else { 2 } + 3` into `if b { 1 } else { 2 } + 3` even in the case that the expression is in `f(expr)` or `let x = expr;` for now.
Previously, the `cast_lossless` lint would issue a warning on code that
converted a `usize` value to `f64`, on 32-bit targets.
`usize` to `f64` is a lossless cast on 32-bit targets, however there is
no corresponding `f64::from` that takes a `usize`, so `cast_lossless`'s
suggested replacement does not compile.
This PR disables the lint in the case of casting from `usize` or `isize`.
Fixes#3689.
changelog: [`cast_lossless`] no longer gives wrong suggestion on usize->f64
Only crate root def-ids don't have a parent, and in majority of cases the argument of `DefIdTree::parent` cannot be a crate root.
So we now panic by default in `parent` and introduce a new non-panicing function `opt_parent` for cases where the argument can be a crate root.
Same applies to `local_parent`/`opt_local_parent`.
Change `span_suggestion` (and variants) to take `impl ToString` rather
than `String` for the suggested code, as this simplifies the
requirements on the diagnostic derive.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
ignore `redundant_pub_crate` in `useless_attribute`
changelog: [`useless_attribute`] no longer lints [`redundant_pub_crate`]
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8732#issuecomment-1106489634
> And it turns out I can't even explicitly allow it at the usage site, because then `clippy::useless_attribute` fires (which would also be a FP?), which is deny-by-default.
>
> Though it does work if I then allow `clippy::useless_attribute`. 😂
>
> ```rust
> #[allow(clippy::useless_attribute)]
> #[allow(clippy::redundant_pub_crate)]
> pub(crate) use bit;
> ```
>
> The originally-reported warning now no longer occurs.
`needless_late_init`: ignore `if let`, `let mut` and significant drops
No longer lints `if let`, personal taste on this one is pretty split, so it probably shouldn't be warning by default. Fixes#8613
```rust
let x = if let Some(n) = y {
n
} else {
1
}
```
No longer lints `let mut`, things like the following are not uncommon and look fine as they are
b169c16d86/src/sixty_four.rs (L88-L93)
Avoids changing the drop order in an observable way, where the type of `x` has a drop with side effects and something between `x` and the first use also does, e.g.
48cc6cb791/tests/test_api.rs (L159-L167)
The implementation of `type_needs_ordered_drop_inner` was changed a bit, it now uses `Ty::has_significant_drop` and reordered the ifs to check diagnostic name before checking the implicit drop impl
changelog: [`needless_late_init`]: No longer lints `if let` statements, `let mut` bindings and no longer significantly changes drop order
mistyped_literal_suffix: improve integer suggestions, avoid wrong float suggestions
This PR fixes 2 things:
- The known problem that integer types are always suggested as signed, by suggesting an unsigned suffix for literals that wouldnt fit in the signed type, and ignores any literals too big for the corresponding unsigned type too.
- The lint would only look at the integer part of any floating point literals without an exponent, this causing #6129. This just ignores those literals.
Examples:
```rust
let _ = 2_32; // still 2_i32
let _ = 234_8; // would now suggest 234_u8
// these are now ignored
let _ = 500_8;
let _ = 123_32.123;
```
changelog: suggest correct integer types in [`mistyped_literal_suffix`], ignore float literals without an exponent
fixes#6129
Previously this lint would only look at the integer part of floating
point literals without an exponent, giving wrong suggestions like:
```
|
8 | let _ = 123_32.123;
| ^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean to write: `123.123_f32`
|
```
Instead, it now ignores these literals.
Fixes#6129
Instead of just always suggesting signed suffixes regardless of size
of the value, it now suggests an unsigned suffix when the value wouldn't
fit into the corresponding signed type, and ignores the literal entirely
if it is too big for the unsigned type as well.
wrong_self_convention allows `is_*` to take `&mut self`
fix#8480 and #8513
Allowing `is_*` to take `&self` or none is too restrictive.
changelog: FPs: [`wrong_self_convention`] now allows `&mut self` and no self as arguments for `is_*` methods
`manual_split_once`: lint manual iteration of `SplitN`
changelog: `manual_split_once`: lint manual iteration of `SplitN`
Now lints:
```rust
let mut iter = "a.b.c".splitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next().unwrap();
let second = iter.next().unwrap();
let mut iter = "a.b.c".splitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next()?;
let second = iter.next()?;
let mut iter = "a.b.c".rsplitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next().unwrap();
let second = iter.next().unwrap();
let mut iter = "a.b.c".rsplitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next()?;
let second = iter.next()?;
```
It suggests (minus leftover whitespace):
```rust
let (first, second) = "a.b.c".split_once('.').unwrap();
let (first, second) = "a.b.c".split_once('.')?;
let (second, first) = "a.b.c".rsplit_once('.').unwrap();
let (second, first) = "a.b.c".rsplit_once('.')?;
```
Currently only lints if the statements are next to each other, as detecting the various kinds of shadowing was tricky, so the following won't lint
```rust
let mut iter = "a.b.c".splitn(2, '.');
let something_else = 1;
let first = iter.next()?;
let second = iter.next()?;
```
Less authoritative stable_sort_primitive message
fixes#8241
Hey all - first contribution here so I'm deciding to start with something small.
Updated the linked message to be less authoritative as well as moved the lint grouping from `perf` to `pedantic` as suggested by `@camsteffen` under the issue.
changelog: [`stable_sort_primitive`]: emit less authoritative message and move to `pedantic`
Fix needless_match false positive for if-let when the else block doesn't match to given expr
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change. Also, it's helpful for us that
the lint name is put into brackets `[]` and backticks `` ` ` ``,
e.g. ``[`lint_name`]``.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
--->
fix#8695
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Fixed ``[`needless_match`]`` false positive when else block expression differs.
Take over: New lint bytes count to len
take over #8375close#8083
This PR adds new lint about considering replacing `.bytes().count()` with `.len()`.
Thank you in advance.
---
r! `@Manishearth`
changelog: adds new lint [`bytes_count_to_len`] to consider replacing `.bytes().count()` with `.len()`
Stop using CRATE_DEF_INDEX outside of metadata encoding.
`CRATE_DEF_ID` and `CrateNum::as_def_id` are almost always what we want. We should not manipulate raw `DefIndex` outside of metadata encoding.
adding test patterns
cargo dev bless
fix comment
add ;
delete :
fix suggestion code
and update stderr in tests.
use match_def_path when checking method name
Add `await_holding_invalid_type` lint
changelog: [`await_holding_invalid_type`]
This lint allows users to create a denylist of types which are not allowed to be
held across await points. This is essentially a re-implementation of the
language-level [`must_not_suspend`
lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83310). That lint has a lot of
work still to be done before it will reach Rust stable, and in the meantime
there are a lot of types which can trip up developers if they are used
improperly.
I originally implemented this specifically for `tracing::span::Entered`, until I discovered #8434 and read the commentary on that PR. Given this implementation is fully user configurable, doesn't tie clippy to any one particular crate, and introduces no additional dependencies, it seems more appropriate.
