Sometimes type annotations are needed for type inferrence to work,
or because of coercions. We don't know this, and we also don't
want users to possibly repeat the entire pattern.
This PR updates the `from_raw_with_void_ptr` lint, which covered
`Box::from_raw`, to also cover the `from_raw` static method of the
`Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
It also improves the description and error messages of this lint.
---
changelog: [`from_raw_with_void_ptr`]: Now works with the `Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
Generate lint categories and explanations with `declare_clippy_lint`
This means contributors will no longer have to run `cargo dev update_lints` after changing a lints documentation or its category, which may also mean fewer merge conflicts in general
It works by swapping `declare_clippy_lint` out for a `proc_macro` of the same name. The proc macro emits a `LintInfo` alongside the generated `Lint` which are gathered into `declared_lint::LINTS`. The categories/explanations are then read from `declared_lint::LINTS` at runtime
The removal of `src/docs` is split into a separate commit to be more easily ignored
It is slightly slower though, adding a bit under a second to build time. Less noticeable in full builds or with a slower linker (benchmark uses mold)
```bash
hyperfine --warmup 2 \
--parameter-list commit "declare-proc-macro,master" \
--command-name "{commit}" \
--setup "git checkout {commit}" \
--prepare "touch clippy_lints/src/lib.rs" \
"cargo build"
```
```
Benchmark 1: declare-proc-macro
Time (mean ± σ): 10.731 s ± 0.154 s [User: 7.739 s, System: 1.791 s]
Range (min … max): 10.598 s … 11.125 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: master
Time (mean ± σ): 9.422 s ± 0.094 s [User: 7.183 s, System: 1.732 s]
Range (min … max): 9.287 s … 9.624 s 10 runs
Summary
'master' ran
1.14 ± 0.02 times faster than 'declare-proc-macro'
```
r? `@flip1995`
cc `@llogiq` for `--explain`
changelog: none
Improvement for `equatable_if_let`
fixes#9221
This PR makes sure that enums or structs not implementing `PartialEq` trait but still using the `if let` patterns can be linted to be rewritten with `matches!`.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: Improve [`equatable_if_let`] with additional `matches!` suggestions.
Fix allow_attributes_without_reason applying to external crate macros
Previously the `clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lint would apply to external crate macros. Many macros in the Rust ecosystem include these `allow` attributes without adding a reason, making this lint pretty much unusable in any sizable Rust project.
This commit fixes that by adding a check to the lint if the attribute is from an external crate macro and returning early.
```
changelog: [`allow_attributes_without_reason`]: allow_attributes_without_reason no longer applies to external crate macros
```
fix: support `map_or` for `or_fun_call` lint
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8993
The methods defined in `KNOW_TYPES`, except for `map_or`, accepts only one argument, so the matching `if let [arg] = args` works only for these methods.
This PR adds `rest_arg` argument to `check_general_case` method and handling of cases with two arguments to support `map_or`.
changelog: `or_fun_call` support `map_or`
* add `rest_arg` to pass second argument from `map_or(U, F)`
* extract some procedures into closure
* add `rest_arg` to pass second argument from `map_or(U, F)`
* extract some procedures into closure
refac: rename rest_arg/second_arg
refac: organize function argument order
* put `second_arg` next to `arg` argument
Mark `let_underscore_lock` and `let_underscore_drop` as uplifted
Here I've renamed both the uplifted lints, however rustc's `let_underscore_lock` is slightly less capable than the clippy lint as it doesn't catch `parking_lot` types or `Result<Guard, ..>`, should we still remove it? The `Result` change looks like it was unintentional to me so that could probably be fixed upstream
changelog: Uplift [`let_underscore_drop`] to rustc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97739
changelog: Remove overlap between rustc's `let_underscore_lock` and Clippy's [`let_underscore_lock`]
r? `@flip1995`
[`unwrap_used`], [`expect_used`] do not lint in `test` cfg
changelog: [`unwrap_used`], [`expect_used`] do not lint in `test` cfg
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9612
I've updated the doc and used `cfg` acronym, not sure if `conditional compiler flag` would have been better
fix `box-default` ignoring trait objects' types
This avoids removing the turbofish when the `Box` type is a `dyn` or `impl _`.
This fixes#9621.
---
changelog: none
Move MSRV tests into the lint specific test files
There are currently two ways MSRV tests are done in the ui test suite, adding a case to the `#![clippy::msrv = "1.0"]` `tests/ui/min_rust_version_attr.rs` or adding the two `msrv_1_xx` functions to the test file of the lint in question
This updates the clippy book to suggest the `msrv_1_xx` style, and replaces the tests in `tests/ui/min_rust_version_attr.rs` with ones of that style
Almost the entire diff is just moving stuff around as a result, I made sure to check the line numbers the lints are emitted at correspond with the right `msrv` case, so feel free to only skim that part
changelog: none
Add `lintcheck` to packages linted by `dogfood` test
Currently, `lintcheck` is not checked by the `dogfood` test. I assume that is not intentional. If it is intentional, then this PR can be ignored.
changelog: Add `lintcheck` to packages linted by `dogfood` test
[`collapsible_match`] specify field name when destructuring structs
changelog: [`collapsible_match`] specify field name when destructuring structs
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9647
I wasn't the sure about the best way to convey the message in the lint message since it does not use suggestion. Because I liked the former output highlighting both spans, I've left it as before, only modifying the span label.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102287 (Elaborate supertrait bounds when triggering `unused_must_use` on `impl Trait`)
- #102922 (Filtering spans when emitting json)
- #103051 (translation: doc comments with derives, subdiagnostic-less enum variants, more derive use)
- #103111 (Account for hygiene in typo suggestions, and use them to point to shadowed names)
- #103260 (Fixup a few tests needing asm support)
- #103321 (rustdoc: improve appearance of source page navigation bar)
Failed merges:
- #103209 (Diagnostic derives: allow specifying multiple alternative suggestions)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
