lintcheck: support git sources
This adds support for git sources in `cargo dev-lintcheck`
You can add a git source to `clippy_dev/lintcheck_crates.toml` by having a `git_url` and a `git_hash` key instead of the `versions` array.
The repo will the be cloned and checked out to the requested commit before checking it with clippy.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6642
changelog: lintcheck: support git sources
disallowed_methods: Support functions in addition to methods
## Context:
Hey all! I have a particular use case where I'd like to ban certain functions in a code base I work on. For example, I want to ban `Instant::now()` (among others) as we have a time service for mocking time in deterministic simulation tests. Obviously, it doesn't make sense to include a lint like this for all clippy users. Imagine my excitement when I spotted the new `disallowed_methods` lint in clippy--perfect! Unfortunately, after playing around with it for a bit, I was frustrated to realize that it didn't support functions like `Instant::now()`, so I've added support for them in this PR.
It might also make sense to rename the lint from `disallowed_methods` -> `disallowed_functions`, though I've held off from including that rename in this change, since I'm unsure of clippy's breaking change policy.
## Change
Support functions in addition to methods. In other words, support:
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::new"]` (a function) in addition to
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::leak"]` (a method).
Improve the documentation to clarify that users must specify the full qualified path for each disallowed function, which can be confusing for reexports. Include an example `clippy.toml`.
Simplify the actual lint pass so we can reuse `utils::fn_def_id`.
changelog: disallowed_method: Now supports functions in addition to methods
Add new lint `filter_map_identity`
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
-->
This commit adds a new lint named filter_map_identity.
This lint is the same as `flat_map_identity` except that it checks for the usage of `filter_map`.
---
Closes#6643
changelog: Added a new lint: `filter_map_identity`
Adds a new lint that checks if there is a semicolon on the last block statement if it returns nothing
changelog: Added a new lint: `SEMICOLON_IF_NOTHING_RETURNED`
fixes#6467
Adds the `SEMICOLON_IF_NOTHING_RETURNED` lint and therefore closes#6467.
Cleanup path-to-local checks
changelog: none
It seemed like too much ceremony going on to check if an expression matches a variable. So I created two util functions `path_to_local(Expr) -> Option<HirId>` and `path_to_local_id(Expr, HirId) -> bool` to make this easier, and used them wherever applicable.
I changed logic in a few places to use `HirId` instead of `Symbol` where it was easy to do so. I believe this is more correct and may even fix some bugs.
I also removed some calls to `qpath_res`. This is not needed if you are only looking for a `Res::Local`.
As a note, I wanted to name the util functions in a way that encourages understanding of the HIR.
tests: ignore check_that_clippy_has_the_same_major_version_as_rustc()inside the rustc repo
Do not check if clippy version matches rustc version when runnning tests inside the rustc repo.
This makes sure that upstream rustc maintainers do not have to deal with our test failing/mismatching versions
when the rustc version bump is happening.
cc #6683
We already do the "don't run inside the rustc-repo" workaround for the dogfood test:
a507c27660/tests/dogfood.rs (L16)
changelog: None
This commit adds a new lint named `filter_map_identity`. This lint is
the same as `flat_map_identity` except that it checks for `filter_map`.
Closes#6643
Do not check if clippy version matches rustc version when runnning tests inside the rustc repo.
This makes sure that upstream rustc maintainers do not have to deal with our test failing/mismatching versions
when the rustc version bump is happening.
cc #6683
Use absolute path to Rust repo in ra_setup
This will convert the path to the Rust repo to an absolute path. This is
important for the clippy_lints/Cargo.toml file. Otherwise if a relative
path is passed, rst-analyzer won't find the Rust repo, because it starts
the relative path search from the clippy_lints dir, not the
rust-clippy dir where the ra_setup command was run from.
changelog: none
This will convert the path to the Rust repo to an absolute path. This is
important for the clippy_lints/Cargo.toml file. Otherwise if a relative
path is passed, rst-analyzer won't find the Rust repo, because it starts
the relative path search from the clippy_lints dir, not the
rust-clippy dir where the ra_setup command was run from.
In other words, support:
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::new"]` (a free function) in
addition to
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::leak"]` (a method).
Improve the documentation to clarify that users must specify the full
qualified path for each disallowed function, which can be confusing for
reexports. Include an example `clippy.toml`.
Simplify the actual lint pass so we can reuse `utils::fn_def_id`.
New Lint: Manual Flatten
This is a draft PR for [Issue 6564](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6564).
r? `@camsteffen`
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Add new lint [`manual_flatten`] to check for loops over a single `if let` expression with `Result` or `Option`.
Fix file names of flat_map_identity test
This patch fixes the file names of the `flat_map_identity` test.
Previously, their names were started with `unnecessary_flat_map` even though the lint rule name is `flat_map_identity`. This inconsistency happened probably because the rule name was changed during the discussion in the PR where this rule was introduced.
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4231
changelog: none
This commit fixes the file names of the `flat_map_identity` test.
Previously, their names were started with `unnecessary_flat_map` even
though the lint rule name is `flat_map_identity`. This inconsistency
happened probably because the rule name was changed during the
discussion in the PR where this rule was introduced.
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4231
Add .editorconfig
This adds a .editorconfig file to rust-lang/rust, matching Clippy's. It's not clear that this will benefit many people, but the cost is low and the rewards are potentially meaningful.
Updated some NITs in the documentation from #6630
I've implemented the two suggestions from #6630 that were added after the merge. This PR also changes the example code to use `register_*_pass` instead of `register_late_pass`. I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but it makes it clearer in my opinion. Let me know if I should change it back.
---
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995`
