So, some context for this, well, more a story. I'm not used to scripting, I've never really scripted anything, even if it's a valuable skill. I just never really needed it. Now, `@flip1995` correctly suggested using a script for this in `rust-clippy#7813`...
And I decided to write a script using nushell because why not? This was a mistake... I spend way more time on this than I would like to admit. It has definitely been more than 4 hours. It shouldn't take that long, but me being new to scripting and nushell just wasn't a good mixture... Anyway, here is the script that creates another script which adds the versions. Fun...
Just execute this on the `gh-pages` branch and the resulting `replacer.sh` in `clippy_lints` and it should all work.
```nu
mv v0.0.212 rust-1.00.0;
mv beta rust-1.57.0;
mv master rust-1.58.0;
let paths = (open ./rust-1.58.0/lints.json | select id id_span | flatten | select id path);
let versions = (
ls | where name =~ "rust-" | select name | format {name}/lints.json |
each { open $it | select id | insert version $it | str substring "5,11" version} |
group-by id | rotate counter-clockwise id version |
update version {get version | first 1} | flatten | select id version);
$paths | each { |row|
let version = ($versions | where id == ($row.id) | format {version})
let idu = ($row.id | str upcase)
$"sed -i '0,/($idu),/{s/pub ($idu),/#[clippy::version = "($version)"]\n pub ($idu),/}' ($row.path)"
} | str collect ";" | str find-replace --all '1.00.0' 'pre 1.29.0' | save "replacer.sh";
```
And this still has some problems, but at this point I just want to be done -.-
`must_use_unit` lints unit-returning functions with a `#[must_use]`
attribute, suggesting to remove it.
`double_must_use` lints functions with a plain `#[must_use]`
attribute, but which return a type which is already `#[must_use]`,
so the attribute has no benefit.
`must_use_candidate` is a pedantic lint that lints functions and
methods that return some non-unit type that is not already
`#[must_use]` and suggests to add the annotation.
Lints when, on the RHS of a BinOp, there is a UnOp without a space
before the operator but with a space after (e.g. foo >- 1).
Signed-off-by: Nikos Filippakis <nikolaos.filippakis@cern.ch>
This was causing two different ICEs in #3741.
The first was fixed in #3925.
The second one is fixed with this commit: We just don't `expect`
anymore. If the snippet doesn't contain an `else`, we stop emitting the
lint because it's not a suspiciously formatted else anyway.
`possible_missing_comma` should only trigger when the binary operator has
unary equivalent. Otherwise, it's not possible to insert a comma without
breaking compilation. The operators identified were `+`, `&`, `*` and `-`.
This fixes the specific examples given in issues #3244 and #3396
but doesn't address the conflict this lint has with the style of starting
a line with a binary operator.
