This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans
pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable
`proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this:
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope
--> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20
|
LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]`
...
LL | field: MissingType
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope
|
::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1
|
LL | #[error_from_attribute]
| ----------------------- in this macro invocation
```
Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro
`#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a
span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]`
This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful -
when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an
error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro
definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro
invocation site.
This is implemented as follows:
* When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!`
macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!`
into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently
compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to
`proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an
opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata.
* When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk
and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to
`proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span
from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a
`TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate
itself.
The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at
first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows
the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to
understand.
This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g.
the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the
`proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote
macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in
`src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs`
Custom quoting currently has a few limitations:
In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to
`proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros
support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode
this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path
`crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the
builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from
arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate
to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span`
to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind
of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything
quote-related.
Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the
`proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro
has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for
custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional
tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of
`proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
Move `inconsistent_struct_constructor` to pedantic
The whole point of named fields is that we don't have to worry about
order. The names, not the position, communicate the information, so
worrying about consistency for consistency's sake is pedantic to a *T*.
Cf. #7192.
changelog: [`inconsistent_struct_constructor`] is moved to pedantic.
wchargin-branch: inconsistent-struct-constructor-pedantic
Backport of #7170 to beta
r? `@ghost`
changelog: none (fixes stack overflow, but this was introduced in this release cycle)
Now actually opened towards the `beta` branch.
Fix stack overflow issue in `redundant_pattern_matching`
Fixes#7169
~~cc `@Jarcho` Since tomorrow is release day and we need to get this also fixed in beta, I'll just revert the PR instead of looking into the root issue. Your changes are good, so if you have an idea what could cause this stack overflow and know how to fix it, please open a PR that reverts this revert with a fix.~~
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: none (fixes stack overflow, but this was introduced in this release cycle)
The whole point of named fields is that we don't have to worry about
order. The names, not the position, communicate the information, so
worrying about consistency for consistency's sake is pedantic to a *T*.
Fixes#7192.
wchargin-branch: inconsistent-struct-constructor-pedantic
wchargin-source: 4fe078a21c77ceb625e58fa3b90b613fc4fa6a76
Fix needless_quesiton_mark false positive
changelog: Fix [`needless_question_mark`] false positive where the inner value is implicity dereferenced by the question mark.
Fixes#7107
Handle write!(buf, "\n") case better
Make `write!(buf, "\n")` suggest `writeln!(buf)` by removing
the trailing comma from `writeln!(buf, )`.
changelog: [`write_with_newline`] suggestion on only "\n" improved
For `to_*` variant don't lint in trait impl taking `self` when non-`Copy` type
Lint name: `wrong_self_convention`.
It relaxes rules for `to_*` variant, so it doesn't lint in trait definitions and implementations anymore.
Although, non-`Copy` type implementing trait's `to_*` method taking
`self` feels not good (consumes ownership, so should be rather named `into_`), it would be better if this case was a pedantic lint (allow-by-default) instead.
More information in the discussion with `@flip1995` [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7002#discussion_r627363450)
changelog: `wrong_self_convention`: For `to_*` variant don't lint in trait impl taking `self` when non-`Copy` type
r? `@flip1995`
Fix duplicated "Rust 1.52" version section header
The most recent changelog update 037ddf282b accompanying the 1.52 release added a second "Rust 1.52" section header, with the result that the Rust release announcement https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/05/06/Rust-1.52.0.html is linking to the "current beta" changelog section for Clippy rather than the stable changelog. I don't know the release process but based on previous changes to this file, I assume the correct thing to do is to mark the topmost section as being for Rust 1.53, not 1.52.
changelog: none
The most recent changelog update 037ddf282b accompanying the 1.52 release added a second "Rust 1.52" section header, with the result that the Rust release announcement https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/05/06/Rust-1.52.0.html is linking to the "current beta" changelog section for Clippy rather than the stable changelog. I don't know the release process but based on previous changes to this file, I assume the correct thing to do is to mark the topmost section as being for Rust 1.53, not 1.52.
Make `write!(buf, "\n")` suggest `writeln!(buf)` by removing
the trailing comma from `writeln!(buf, )`.
changelog: [`write_with_newline`] suggestion on only "\n" improved
It relaxes rules for `to_*` variant, so it doesn't lint in trait definitions
and implementations anymore.
Although, non-`Copy` type implementing trait's `to_*` method taking
`self` feels not good (consumes ownership, so should be rather named `into_`), it would be better if this case was a pedantic lint (allow-by-default) instead.
Refactor: arrange lints in misc_early module
This PR arranges misc_early lints so that they can be accessed more easily.
Basically, I refactored them following the instruction described in #6680.
cc: `@Y-Nak,` `@flip1995,` `@magurotuna`
changelog: Move lints in misc_early module into their own modules.
Fix stack overflow issue in `redundant_pattern_matching`
Fixes#7169
~~cc `@Jarcho` Since tomorrow is release day and we need to get this also fixed in beta, I'll just revert the PR instead of looking into the root issue. Your changes are good, so if you have an idea what could cause this stack overflow and know how to fix it, please open a PR that reverts this revert with a fix.~~
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: none (fixes stack overflow, but this was introduced in this release cycle)
A metadata collection monster
This PR introduces a metadata collection lint as discussed in #4310. It currently collects:
* The lint ID
* The lint declaration file and location (for #1303)
* The lint group
* The documentation
* The applicability (if resolvable)
* If the suggestion is a multi-part-suggestion
This data has a slightly different structure than the current [lints.json](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/gh-pages/master/lints.json) and doesn't include depreciated lints yet. I plan to adapt the website to the new format and include depreciated lints in a follow-up PR :). The current collected json looks like this: [metadata_collection.json](https://gist.github.com/xFrednet/6b9e2c3f725f476ba88db9563f67e119)
The entire implementation is guarded behind the `metadata-collector-lint` feature and the `ENABLE_METADATA_COLLECTION` environment value to prevent default collection. You can test the implementation via:
```sh
$ ENABLE_METADATA_COLLECTION=1 cargo test --test dogfood --all-features
```
changelog: none
---
The size of this PR sadly also grew into a small monster, sorry! I definitely plan to improve on this! And it's totally okay if you take your time with this :)
r? `@phansch`
cc: `@flip1995`
