fix `undocumented-unsafe-blocks` false positive
This fixes#9142 by iterating over the parent nodes as long as within a block, expression, statement, local, const or static.
---
changelog: none
Ensure new_ret_no_self is not fired if impl Trait<Self> is returned.
Fix#7344: ensure new_ret_no_self is not fired if `impl Trait<Self>` is returned.
changelog: [`new_ret_no_self`]: No longer lints when `impl Trait<Self>` is returned
[`use_self`] fix suggestion when full path to struct was given
Previously the following wrong suggestion was given
```rust
impl Error for std::fmt::Error {
fn custom<T: std::fmt::Display>(_msg: T) -> Self {
- std::fmt::Error // Should lint
+ Self::Error // Should lint
}
}
```
Also remove known problem line related to #4140 since it's been closed, and refactor the lint
changelog: [`use_self`] fix suggestion when full path to struct was given
`question_mark` don't lint on `if let Err` with `else`
cc #9518
AFAICT the only time this would be a valid suggestion is the rather esoteric
```rust
let _ = if let Err(e) = x {
return Err(e);
} else {
// no side effects
x.unwrap()
}
```
which doesn't seem worth checking to me. Please correct me if I'm missing something.
changelog: [`question_mark`] don't lint on `if let Err` with `else`
Previously the following wrong suggestion was given
```rust
impl Error for std::fmt::Error {
fn custom<T: std::fmt::Display>(_msg: T) -> Self {
- std::fmt::Error // Should lint
+ Self::Error // Should lint
}
}
```
Also remove known problem line related to #4140 since it's been closed, and refactor the lint
Track `clippy.toml` and `Cargo.toml` in `file_depinfo`
Causes cargo to re-run clippy when those paths are modified
Also tracks the path to `clippy-driver` in debug mode to remove the workarounds in `cargo dev lint` and `lintcheck` (cc `@matthiaskrgr)`
changelog: Automatically re-run Clippy if `Cargo.toml` or `clippy.toml` are modified
Fixes#2130Fixes#8512
r? `@flip1995`
Causes cargo to re-run clippy when those paths are modified
Also tracks the path to `clippy-driver` in debug mode to remove the
workarounds in `cargo dev lint` and `lintcheck`
make ignored internally mutable types for `mutable-key` configurable
We had some false positives where people would create their own types that had interior mutability unrelated to hash/eq. This addition lets you configure this as e.g. `arc-like-types=["bytes::Bytes"]`
This fixes#5325 by allowing users to specify the types whose innards like `Arc` should be ignored (the generic types are still checked) for the sake of detecting inner mutability.
r? `@Alexendoo`
---
changelog: Allow configuring types to ignore internal mutability in `mutable-key`
Update `from_raw_with_void_ptr` to support types other than `Box`
This PR updates the `from_raw_with_void_ptr` lint, which covered
`Box::from_raw`, to also cover the `from_raw` static method of the
`Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
It also improves the description and error messages of this lint.
---
changelog: [`from_raw_with_void_ptr`]: Now works with the `Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
add new lint `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind `
changelog: `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind`: new lint to suggest using `rewind` instead of `seek` to start
Resolve#8600
We had some false positives where people would create their own types
that had interior mutability unrelated to hash/eq. This addition lets
you configure this as e.g. `arc-like-types=["bytes::Bytes"]`
Sometimes type annotations are needed for type inferrence to work,
or because of coercions. We don't know this, and we also don't
want users to possibly repeat the entire pattern.
This PR updates the `from_raw_with_void_ptr` lint, which covered
`Box::from_raw`, to also cover the `from_raw` static method of the
`Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
It also improves the description and error messages of this lint.
---
changelog: [`from_raw_with_void_ptr`]: Now works with the `Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
Improvement for `equatable_if_let`
fixes#9221
This PR makes sure that enums or structs not implementing `PartialEq` trait but still using the `if let` patterns can be linted to be rewritten with `matches!`.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: Improve [`equatable_if_let`] with additional `matches!` suggestions.
Fix allow_attributes_without_reason applying to external crate macros
Previously the `clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lint would apply to external crate macros. Many macros in the Rust ecosystem include these `allow` attributes without adding a reason, making this lint pretty much unusable in any sizable Rust project.
This commit fixes that by adding a check to the lint if the attribute is from an external crate macro and returning early.
```
changelog: [`allow_attributes_without_reason`]: allow_attributes_without_reason no longer applies to external crate macros
```
fix: support `map_or` for `or_fun_call` lint
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8993
The methods defined in `KNOW_TYPES`, except for `map_or`, accepts only one argument, so the matching `if let [arg] = args` works only for these methods.
This PR adds `rest_arg` argument to `check_general_case` method and handling of cases with two arguments to support `map_or`.
changelog: `or_fun_call` support `map_or`
* add `rest_arg` to pass second argument from `map_or(U, F)`
* extract some procedures into closure
* add `rest_arg` to pass second argument from `map_or(U, F)`
* extract some procedures into closure
refac: rename rest_arg/second_arg
refac: organize function argument order
* put `second_arg` next to `arg` argument
Mark `let_underscore_lock` and `let_underscore_drop` as uplifted
Here I've renamed both the uplifted lints, however rustc's `let_underscore_lock` is slightly less capable than the clippy lint as it doesn't catch `parking_lot` types or `Result<Guard, ..>`, should we still remove it? The `Result` change looks like it was unintentional to me so that could probably be fixed upstream
changelog: Uplift [`let_underscore_drop`] to rustc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97739
changelog: Remove overlap between rustc's `let_underscore_lock` and Clippy's [`let_underscore_lock`]
r? `@flip1995`
