Mark format! with must_use hint
Uses unstable feature https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94745
Part of #126475
First contribution to rust, please let me know if the blessing of tests is correct
Thanks `@bjorn3` for the help
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126841 ([`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] Add support for literals)
- #126881 (Make `NEVER_TYPE_FALLBACK_FLOWING_INTO_UNSAFE` a deny-by-default lint in edition 2024)
- #126921 (Give VaList its own home)
- #127367 (Run alloc sync tests)
- #127431 (Use field ident spans directly instead of the full field span in diagnostics on local fields)
- #127437 (Uplift trait ref is knowable into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
- #127439 (Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`)
- #127451 (Improve `run-make/output-type-permutations` code and improve `filename_not_in_denylist` API)
- #127452 (Fix intrinsic const parameter counting with `effects`)
- #127459 (rustdoc-json: add type/trait alias tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Support tail calls in mir via `TerminatorKind::TailCall`
This is one of the interesting bits in tail call implementation — MIR support.
This adds a new `TerminatorKind` which represents a tail call:
```rust
TailCall {
func: Operand<'tcx>,
args: Vec<Operand<'tcx>>,
fn_span: Span,
},
```
*Structurally* this is very similar to a normal `Call` but is missing a few fields:
- `destination` — tail calls don't write to destination, instead they pass caller's destination to the callee (such that eventual `return` will write to the caller of the function that used tail call)
- `target` — similarly to `destination` tail calls pass the caller's return address to the callee, so there is nothing to do
- `unwind` — I _think_ this is applicable too, although it's a bit confusing
- `call_source` — `become` forbids operators and is not created as a lowering of something else; tail calls always come from HIR (at least for now)
It might be helpful to read the interpreter implementation to understand what `TailCall` means exactly, although I've tried documenting it too.
-----
There are a few `FIXME`-questions still left, ideally we'd be able to answer them during review ':)
-----
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@scottmcm` `@DrMeepster` `@JakobDegen`
Rework `init_numbered_fields`
Two behaviour changes:
* Not linting in macros
* Not linting when side effects might be reordered
changelog: `init_numbered_fields`: Don't suggest reordering side effects.
