When license property is missing in Cargo.toml check for license-file
as it may be used instead of the former. The check implemented here is
very naive as it only verifies that the field is present and is not
empty. More scrutiny can be applied by verifying the file is actually
present.
Fixes#4517
#4542 remove machine applicable suggestion
This helps #4542 (but does not completely resolve) by removing the machine applicable suggestion (which was incorrect) for that case.
I would have preferred to fix the machine applicable suggestion to handle format strings, but that's a bit beyond my current understanding of the clippy codebase. I'd be happy to give it a try given some guidance.
changelog: only produce machine applicable suggestions on `explicit_write` lint
Changes cast-lossless to a pedantic lint
As discussed in #4528, this moves the cast-lossless lint from `all` to `pedantic`.
I couldn't tell from description alone if it should also be removed from the complexity category, so I left it as part of complexity for now. I didn't see any impact to the tests from this change, but I could be wrong (as this is my first PR).
fixes#4528
changelog: Moves cast-lossless from default to checking only as a `pedantic` lint.
Fix incorrect swap suggestion
Clippy suggests using swap on fields belonging to the same owner causing two mutable borrows of the owner.
Disclosure: This is my first time working with clippy and rusts HIR. I'm very grateful for assistance and suggestions to improve the PR.
fixes#981
changelog: Fix false positive in `manual_swap` lint
New `is_integer_const` to check more const ints
This mostly affects loop checks and the modulo_one lint. Tests were also updated where applicable.
changelog: none
Changed more `Vec` paths to diagnostic_items
In #4519, I missed a few instances of path matching for `Vec`, so here they are.
r? @oli-obk
changelog: none
Allow block_in_if_{stmt,expr} in external macro
I found this by running `cargo fix --clippy` on quite a big codebase.
You could refactor this assert to
```rust
let block_expr = _;
assert!(block_expr);
```
but,
1. it doesn't increase the readability IMO
2. That isn't possible in a `debug_assert!`
I'm not sure though, if we should allow this for macros in general or just for external macros.
changelog: Allow `block_in_if_{stmt,expr}` in external macros
Simplify `utils::match_def_path`, removing a FIXME
changelog: none
This removes the `Vec<Symbol>` allocation. We still need to call `cx.get_def_path`, but this should already have been interned, and I don't see how we can keep ergonomics of that function without allocating a `Vec`.
r? @phansch
