fix: incorrect suggestions when `.then` and `.then_some` is used
fixes#11910
In the current implementation of `search_is_some`, if a `.is_none` call is followed by a `.then` or `.then_some` call, the generated `!` will incorrectly negate the values returned by the `then` and `.then_some` calls. To fix this, we need to add parentheses to the generated suggestions when appropriate.
changelog: [`search_is_some`]: add parenthesis to suggestions when appropriate
[`module_name_repetition`] Recognize common prepositions
Fixes#12544
changelog: [`module_name_repetition`]: don't report an item name if it consists only of a prefix from `allowed-prefixes` list and a module name (e.g. `AsFoo` in module `foo`). Prefixes allowed by default: [`to`, `from`, `into`, `as`, `try_into`, `try_from`]
Use `check_attributes` in doc lints
Ensures we catch all the places that doc comments could occur, found one that we were currently missing - docs on `extern` items
changelog: none
Pin `remark-lint-maximum-line-length` version
Pins the remark versions to the ones from before the most recent set of updates which errors on [some line lengths](https://github.com/remarkjs/remark-lint/issues/318) that aren't clear how to resolve
Currently blocking CI
changelog: none
Consistent lint group table in book and README
The lint table and the restriction group description was improved in #10385, but only in the README. Apply the same changes to the book.
r? `@xFrednet`
I noticed that I left review comments about this in #10385, but never submitted them. So to this day they are listed as "pending" in the GitHub UI.
This is just copy and paste of the current README file on `master`.
changelog: none
Fixes#12544.
- don't report an item name if it consists only of a prefix from `allowed-prefixes` list and a module name (e.g. `AsFoo` in module `foo`).
- configured by `allowed-prefixes` config entry
- prefixes allowed by default: [`to`, `from`, `into`, `as`, `try_into`, `try_from`]
- update docs
Correct parentheses for [`needless_borrow`] suggestion
This fixes#12268
Clippy no longer adds unnecessary parentheses in suggestions when the expression is part of a tuple.
---
changelog: Fix [`needless_borrow`] unnecessary parentheses in suggestion.
Implement minimal, internal-only pattern types in the type system
rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107606
You can create pattern types with `std::pat::pattern_type!(ty is pat)`. The feature is incomplete and will panic on you if you use any pattern other than integral range patterns. The only way to create or deconstruct a pattern type is via `transmute`.
This PR's implementation differs from the MCP's text. Specifically
> This means you could implement different traits for different pattern types with the same base type. Thus, we just forbid implementing any traits for pattern types.
is violated in this PR. The reason is that we do need impls after all in order to make them usable as fields. constants of type `std::time::Nanoseconds` struct are used in patterns, so the type must be structural-eq, which it only can be if you derive several traits on it. It doesn't need to be structural-eq recursively, so we can just manually implement the relevant traits on the pattern type and use the pattern type as a private field.
Waiting on:
* [x] move all unrelated commits into their own PRs.
* [x] fix niche computation (see 2db07f94f44f078daffe5823680d07d4fded883f)
* [x] add lots more tests
* [x] T-types MCP https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/126 to finish
* [x] some commit cleanup
* [x] full self-review
* [x] remove 61bd325da19a918cc3e02bbbdce97281a389c648, it's not necessary anymore I think.
* [ ] ~~make sure we never accidentally leak pattern types to user code (add stability checks or feature gate checks and appopriate tests)~~ we don't even do this for the new float primitives
* [x] get approval that [the scope expansion to trait impls](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326866-t-types.2Fnominated/topic/Pattern.20types.20types-team.23126/near/427670099) is ok
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Stop exporting `TypeckRootCtxt` and `FnCtxt`.
While they have many convenient APIs, it is better to expose dedicated functions for them
noticed in #122213
Add consistency with phrases "meantime" and "mean time"
"mean time" is used in a few places while "meantime" is used everywhere else; this would make usage consistent throughout the codebase.
fix incorrect suggestion for `!(a as type >= b)`
fixes#12625
The expression `!(a as type >= b)` got simplified to `a as type < b`, but because of rust's parsing rules that `<` is interpreted as a start of generic arguments for `type`. This is fixed by recognizing this case and adding extra parens around the left-hand side of the comparison.
changelog: [`nonminimal_bool`]: fix incorrect suggestion for `!(a as type >= b)`
[`manual_unwrap_or_default`]: Check for Default trait implementation in initial condition when linting and use `IfLetOrMatch`
Fixes#12564
changelog: Fix [`manual_unwrap_or_default`] false positive when initial `match`/`if let` condition doesn't implement `Default` but the return type does.
Prevent PR assignments to `@matthiaskrgr`, `@giraffate`, and `@Centri3`
When commenting r? clippy, rustbot takes a random member from the team. I'm setting you kings and queen to be on vacation, so that rustbot doesn't target you.
---
changelog: none
cc: `@matthiaskrgr` `@giraffate` and `@Centri3`
fix ice reporting in lintcheck
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12185
This PR fixes the lack of reported ICEs within lintcheck by modifying the way in which data is collected from each crate being linted.
Instead of lintcheck only reading `stdout` for warnings, it now also reads `stderr` for any potential ICE (although admittedly, it is not the cleanest method of doing so). If it is detected, it parses the ICE into its message and backtrace separately, and then adds them to the list of outputs via clippy.
Once all outputs are collected, the formatter then proceeds to generate the file as normal.
Note that this PR also has a couple of side effects:
- When clippy fails to process a package, but said failure is not an ICE, the `stderr` will be sent to the console;
- Instead of `ClippyWarning` being the primary struct for everything reported, there is now `ClippyCheckOutput`, an enum which splits the outputs into warnings and ICEs.
changelog: none
Allow `cast` lints in macros
closes: #11738
Removed the `from_expansion` guard clause for cast lints, so that these warnings can be generated for internal macros.
changelog: allow `cast` lints in macros
type certainty: clear `DefId` when an expression's type changes to non-adt
Fixes#12585
The root cause of the ICE in the linked issue was in the expression `one.x`, in the array literal.
The type of `one` is the `One` struct: an adt with a DefId, so its certainty is `Certain(def_id_of_one)`. However, the field access `.x` can then change the type (to `i32` here) and that should update that `DefId` accordingly. It does do that correctly when `one.x` would be another adt with a DefId:
97ba291d5a/clippy_utils/src/ty/type_certainty/mod.rs (L90-L91)
but when it *isn't* an adt and there is no def id (which is the case in the linked issue: `one.x` is an i32), it keeps the `DefId` of `One`, even though that's the wrong type (which would then lead to a contradiction later when joining `Certainty`s):
97ba291d5a/clippy_utils/src/ty/type_certainty/mod.rs (L92-L93)
In particular, in the linked issue, `from_array([one.x, two.x])` would try to join the `Certainty` of the two array elements, which *should* have been `[Certain(None), Certain(None)]`, because `i32`s have no `DefId`, but instead it was `[Certain(One), Certain(Two)]`, because the DefId wasn't cleared from when it was visiting `one` and `two`. This is the "contradiction" that could be seen in the ICE message
... so this changes it to clear the `DefId` when it isn't an adt.
cc `@smoelius` you implemented this initially in #11135, does this change make sense to you?
changelog: none
Reword `arc_with_non_send_sync` note and help messages
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12608#issuecomment-2029688054
Makes the note more concise and reframes the `Rc` suggestion around whether it crosses threads currently due to a manual `Send`/`Sync` impl or may do in the future
changelog: none
