manual_unwrap_or: fix invalid code suggestion, due to macro expansion
fixes#6965
changelog: fix invalid code suggestion in `manual_unwrap_or` lint, due to macro expansion
Refactor MSRV aliases
changelog: Remove MSRV from `needless_question_mark` and change MSRV for `missing_const_for_fn` from 1.37.0 to 1.46.0.
First [mentioned on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Better.20MSRV.20testing.20idea/near/236215074).
* Moves MSRV constants into `clippy_utils::msrvs`. Now they are named to represent a stabilized feature flag or library item that is required for a lint's suggestion.
* `needless_question_mark` no longer has MSRV. Not needed since it does not suggest adding `?`.
* `missing_const_for_fn` MSRV was changed from 1.37.0 to 1.46.0. This seems to be a past mistake.
extend `single_element_loop` to match `.iter()`
This extends `single_element_loop` to also match `[..].iter()` in the loop argument. Related to #7125, but not completely fixing it due to the lint only firing if the array expression contains a local variable.
---
changelog: none
`single_component_path_imports`: ignore `pub(crate) use some_macro;`
Fixes#7106
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Ignore exporting a macro within a crate using `pub(crate) use some_macro;` for [`single_component_path_imports`]
Unused io amount detects `.read().ok()?`
fixes#7096
changelog: unused_io_amount now detect expertion like `.read().ok()?`, `.read().or_else(|err| ...)?` and similar expressions.
Better suggestions when returning macro calls.
Suggest changeing all the break expressions in a loop, not just the final statement.
Don't lint divergent functions.
Don't suggest returning the result of any divergent fuction.
Switch transmute_ptr_to_ptr to "pedantic" class.
Per discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6372, this lint has significant false positives.
changelog: transmute_ptr_to_ptr defaults to "allow".
Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
useless use of format! should return function directly
fixes#7066
changelog: [`useless_format`] wraps the content in the braces when it's needed.
r? `@giraffate`
un-double `return` on try_err
This fixes#7103 by looking at the parent expression and omitting the "return " in the suggestion when its already a `return` expression.
---
changelog: none
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`
I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations.
The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`.
**Implementation**:
The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`:
```rust
/// This operation is unsupported on this platform.
Unsupported
```
`std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations.
`decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`:
- Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS`
- Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`
- WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS`
**Stability**:
This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention:
> Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value.
The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change.
The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
