Commit graph

10552 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuki Okushi
df85532112 Rollup merge of #78326 - Aaron1011:fix/min-stmt-lints, r=petrochenkov
Split out statement attributes changes from #78306

This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).

This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.

---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.

```rust
trait Foo {
    #[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
    #[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```

However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).

Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.

This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:

* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
  `StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
  variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
  which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
  statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
  item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
  invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
  attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
  sibiling attributes on an item statement.

For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
2020-10-25 18:43:49 +09:00
Francis Murillo
e7e03b7912 Change from correctness to style and MaybeIncorrect instead of MachineApplicable 2020-10-25 17:41:30 +08:00
Francis Murillo
292cb9bfb6 Use sugg_lint_and_help 2020-10-25 17:41:30 +08:00
Francis Murillo
77e34a69bb Inline is_mut_mutex_lock_call 2020-10-25 17:41:30 +08:00
Francis Murillo
ec0c3afa73 Run update_lints 2020-10-25 17:41:30 +08:00
Francis Murillo
fb8a9cb38d Change lint doc test 2020-10-25 17:41:24 +08:00
bors
6b01c39e64 Auto merge of #6181 - cgm616:undropped-manually-drops, r=flip1995
Add new lint for undropped ManuallyDrop values

Adds a new lint for the following code:

```rust
struct S;

impl Drop for S {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        println!("drip drop");
    }
}

fn main() {
    // This will not drop the `S`!!!
    drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
    unsafe {
        // This will.
        std::mem::ManuallyDrop::drop(&mut std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
    }
}
```

The inner value of a `ManuallyDrop` will not be dropped unless the proper, unsafe drop function is called on it. This lint makes sure that a user does not accidently use the wrong function and forget to drop a `ManuallyDrop` value.

Fixes #5581.

---

*Please keep the line below*
changelog: none
2020-10-25 09:37:09 +00:00
Francis Murillo
f82f9c2c55 Add lint for &mut Mutex::lock 2020-10-25 17:18:52 +08:00
bors
e0e617adaa Auto merge of #6109 - patrickelectric:single_element_for_check, r=flip1995
Add linter for a single element for loop

changelog: Fixes #1540, check for vectors that contain a single element in a for loop
2020-10-25 09:15:55 +00:00
bors
a675778cfb Auto merge of #6029 - Daniel-B-Smith:refcell_ref_await, r=flip1995
Add lint for holding RefCell Ref across an await

Fixes #6008

This introduces the lint await_holding_refcell_ref. For async functions, we iterate
over all types in generator_interior_types and look for `core::cell::Ref` or `core::cell::RefMut`. If we find one then we emit a lint.

Heavily cribs from: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/5439

changelog: introduce the await_holding_refcell_ref lint
2020-10-25 08:54:27 +00:00
bors
b06856eae0 Auto merge of #6187 - geoffreycopin:master, r=ebroto
Lint unnecessary int-to-int and float-to-float casts

This is an implementation of a lint that detects unnecessary casts of number literals, as discussed here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6116

---

changelog: lint unnecessary as-casts of literals when they could be written using literal syntax.
2020-10-24 23:29:49 +00:00
bors
29979ad043 Auto merge of #6190 - montrivo:manual_result_unwrap_or, r=ebroto
manual_unwrap_or / support Result::unwrap_or

Implements partially #5923.

changelog: support Result::unwrap_or in manual_unwrap_or
2020-10-24 23:09:14 +00:00
bors
5c78d26e5e Auto merge of #6135 - cauebs:master, r=ebroto
Add large_types_passed_by_value lint

Creates a new lint that checks for large function parameters passed by value. ~Types that are Copy were ignored, because I understand they are explicitly marked as being cheap (or just acceptable) to copy. Arrays were excluded from that restriction because they are always Copy, independently of the size, if the elements are Copy.~ Only Copy types are considered, because if a type is not Copy it cannot be dereferenced, as pointed out by `@ebroto,` and that would require analyzing the whole function body to check if the argument is moved somewhere else. `self` and `mut` parameters are also skipped.

I refactored `trivially_copy_pass_by_ref` and the new lint into a new `pass_by_ref_or_value` module, since both share most of their implementations, as was pointed out to me in #4499.

~Some questions that remain:~
~1. Should `self` be disregarded for this lint?~
~2. Should we special case types like Vec and String when suggesting changes? (to slices and &str)~
~3. What should be the default size limit?~
~4. Are there any special cases I'm missing?~

I ask the maintainers to add the `hacktoberfest-accepted` label if this PR is decent, even if there are some minor details to work out, but I do intend to stick around and finish the job.

Fixes #4499

changelog: Add new lint [`large_types_passed_by_value`]
2020-10-24 22:31:53 +00:00
Cauê Baasch de Souza
e8731a926c Add large_types_passed_by_value lint
Refactor trivially_copy_pass_by_ref and the new lint into pass_by_ref_or_value module

Update stderr of conf_unknown_key test

Rename lint to large_types_passed_by_value

Increase `pass_by_value_size_limit` default value to 256

Improve rules for `large_types_passed_by_value`

Improve tests for `large_types_passed_by_value`

Improve documentation for `large_types_passed_by_value`

Make minor corrections to pass_by_ref_or_value.rs suggested by clippy itself

Fix `large_types_passed_by_value` example and improve docs

pass_by_ref_or_value: Tweak check for mut annotation in params

large_types_passed_by_value: add tests for pub trait, trait impl and inline attributes
2020-10-24 14:46:56 -03:00
Aaron Hill
33f3cfcadc Fix inconsistencies in handling of inert attributes on statements
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.

```rust
trait Foo {
    #[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
    #[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```

However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).

Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.

This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:

* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
  `StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
  variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
  which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
  statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
  item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
  invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
  attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
  sibiling attributes on an item statement.

For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
2020-10-24 11:55:48 -04:00
Geoffrey Copin
71ac0c0be8 Keep separators in cast_size_32bits stderr 2020-10-24 14:08:53 +02:00
Tim Nielens
0d21ae0e19 manual-unwrap-or / pr remarks, round 3 2020-10-24 11:35:05 +02:00
ThibsG
62f60e1ae5 No lint with cfg! and fix sugg for macro in needless_bool lint 2020-10-24 09:37:23 +02:00
Geoffrey Copin
d46edd9966 Keep sign in int-to-float casts 2020-10-24 00:04:37 +02:00
Eduardo Broto
6caeed1bfa Remove duplicate import of Target 2020-10-23 23:45:37 +02:00
Eduardo Broto
cdb555f4fc Merge commit 'bf1c6f9871f430e284b17aa44059e0d0395e28a6' into clippyup 2020-10-23 22:16:59 +02:00
bors
bf1c6f9871 Auto merge of #6206 - ebroto:rustup, r=ebroto
Rustup

changelog: none

r? `@ghost`
2020-10-23 16:58:39 +00:00
Eduardo Broto
d17edaa152 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into rustup 2020-10-23 14:37:17 +02:00
Joe Richey
3807634a47
clippy_lints: Update empty_loop lint
We also update the documentation to note that the remediations are
different for `std` and `no_std` crates.

Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
2020-10-22 22:03:13 -07:00
Geoffrey Copin
30f80c3b8c Fix test file 2020-10-23 00:33:15 +02:00
Geoffrey Copin
02f01104bf Add test case for negative literals 2020-10-23 00:04:27 +02:00
Geoffrey Copin
e8f12d2f02 Address review comments 2020-10-22 23:56:49 +02:00
Tim Nielens
6533d8becf manual-unwrap-or / pr remarks, round 2 2020-10-22 23:39:59 +02:00
Tim Nielens
f2da0c701e manual-unwrap-or / pr remarks 2020-10-22 22:46:10 +02:00
varkor
fcde7683fe Fix clippy tests 2020-10-22 13:23:14 +01:00
bors
fbe75a8497 Auto merge of #6203 - giraffate:fix_link_to_labeled_issues, r=Manishearth
Fix links to labeled issues

These labels seems wrong.
- <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/labels/L-crash%20%3Aboom%3A>
- <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/labels/L-bug%20%3Abeetle%3A>

changelog: none
2020-10-22 07:37:02 +00:00
Andre Bogus
c693de350a New lint: manual-range-contains 2020-10-22 08:45:21 +02:00
cgm616
e70817e712 Update tests and add known problems to docs 2020-10-21 21:21:11 -04:00
cgm616
4a4f998c39 Add new lint for undropped ManuallyDrop values 2020-10-21 21:21:11 -04:00
Takayuki Nakata
496dbb6fe8 Fix links to labeled issues 2020-10-22 08:51:03 +09:00
Daniel Smith
4d3322525d Separate tests for each lint 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
86f2b29d2f Merge lints into one pass 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
d8c6bce440 Convert the await holding lints to correctness 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
ee20ebadaf Move refcell lint into shared module 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
3ed69cdb13 Move existing lint into shared file 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
b3a427d873 Add another test case 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
0f4abbf99a Better naming post copy/paste 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
070a751d4c update_lints 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
8727169f72 fmt 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
Daniel Smith
57bf80f776 Add lint for holding RefCell Ref across an await 2020-10-21 11:04:26 -04:00
bors
85959be606 Auto merge of #6193 - Ryan1729:add-more-LintStore-documentation, r=phansch
Add more infomation about LintStore registration

Backstory: I somehow missed the fact that I needed to register a lint pass in order for it to run, and I spent some time confused until I figured it out. So I wanted to make it clear that a missing `register_(early|late)_pass` call is a likely cause of a lint not running.

changelog: none
2020-10-20 09:38:38 +00:00
Tim Nielens
65b52d84f8 needless-lifetime / multiple where clause predicates regression 2020-10-20 00:42:00 +02:00
bors
eaffd0e418 Auto merge of #6167 - ThibsG:IdenticalArgumentsAssertEq3574, r=ebroto
Identical arguments on assert macro family

Lint when identical args are used on `assert_eq!`, `debug_assert_eq!`, `assert_ne!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros.

Added to the lint `eq_op`.

Common functions added to `utils/higher.rs`

Fixes: #3574
Fixes: #4694

changelog: Lint on identical args when calling `assert_eq!`, `debug_assert_eq!`, `assert_ne!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros
2020-10-19 19:50:12 +00:00
ThibsG
16b5f37b5a Split eq_op ui tests to avoid file limit error in CI 2020-10-19 17:36:48 +02:00
bors
74530adcba Auto merge of #6166 - achris:master, r=flip1995
Suggest a compatible shell for setup-toolchain.sh

setup-toolchain.sh uses "[[" which is a bash builtin, but the guide
suggests running it with sh.  On Ubuntu, /bin/sh points to dash and
running the script fails.

---

*Please keep the line below*
changelog: none
2020-10-19 13:17:07 +00:00