Commit graph

11207 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
9ddea51a73 Auto merge of #12912 - lochetti:fix_12824, r=dswij
Don't lint indexing_slicing lints on proc macros

This pr fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12824

Even though the issue mentions the indexing case only, it was easy to apply the fix to the slicing case as well.

changelog: [`out_of_bounds_indexing`, `indexing_slicing`]: Don't lint on procedural macros.
2024-06-11 15:27:36 +00:00
bors
87c895ad83 Auto merge of #12915 - belyakov-am:lint/single_char_add_str, r=xFrednet
Handle single chars with `to_string()` for `single_char_add_str`

Add support for single chars / literals with `to_string()` call for `push_str()` and `insert_str()`.

changelog: [`single_char_add_str`]: handle single chars with `to_string()` call

Closes #12775
2024-06-11 11:08:45 +00:00
bors
acdf564692 Auto merge of #12904 - Jarcho:issue_10750, r=xFrednet
Normalize type aliases when checking significant drops.

fixes #10750

No test as I'm not sure exactly how the type alias caused a stack overflow here. Also removes an unnecessary `HashSet`.

changelog: none
2024-06-11 10:47:49 +00:00
Renato Lochetti
f7515ae905
Don't lint indexing_slicing lints on proc macros 2024-06-10 09:08:56 +01:00
Artem Belyakov
f7723cada7 Fix dogfood test 2024-06-09 21:23:59 +03:00
Artem Belyakov
55344c84a5 Handle single chars with to_string() for single_char_add_str 2024-06-09 21:01:00 +03:00
bors
48686adf48 Auto merge of #12805 - Alexendoo:blocks-in-conditions-closures, r=dswij
Don't lint blocks in closures for blocks_in_conditions

Seemed like an outlier for the lint which generally caught only the syntactically confusing cases, it lints blocks in closures but excludes closures passed to iterator methods, this changes it to ignore closures in general

changelog: none
2024-06-08 09:45:22 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
75e1d72093 Normalize type aliases when checking significant drops. 2024-06-08 01:19:05 -04:00
bors
0ea88b90d8 Auto merge of #12900 - Alexendoo:no-lazy-static, r=llogiq
Remove `lazy_static` mention

I planned to replace any mention with `LazyLock` but I think `thread_local` is more appropriate here - `const`s that aren't `Sync` wouldn't be able to go in a `lazy_static`/`static LazyLock` either

Also removed a test file that was mostly commented out so wasn't testing anything

changelog: none
2024-06-07 22:54:02 +00:00
bors
d553ebef57 Auto merge of #12851 - samueltardieu:issue12846, r=y21
Add required parentheses around method receiver

Fix #12846

changelog: [`needless_bool`]: Add missing parentheses around method receiver
2024-06-07 21:27:46 +00:00
Alex Macleod
65af5d7b22 Remove lazy_static mention 2024-06-07 12:51:37 +00:00
Alex Macleod
b21ee38fa9 Don't lint blocks in closures for blocks_in_conditions 2024-06-07 11:21:38 +00:00
bors
336046c5e2 Auto merge of #12889 - xFrednet:changelog-1-79, r=flip1995,dswij
Changelog for Clippy 1.79 🎓

Two cat ears from waffle,
A tail and a dress,
That's our Jyn,
The magnificent cat

~ =^.^=

---

### The cat of this release is: *Jyn* submitted by `@jyn514:`

<img height=600 src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/assets/17087237/2f902dea-9ad5-4ad2-b281-1f152b7ad7c7" alt="The cat(s) of this Clippy release" />

Cats for the next release can be nominated in the comments :D

---

changelog: none
2024-06-07 10:02:32 +00:00
bors
f990ea155e Auto merge of #12844 - Alexendoo:to-string-in-format-args, r=dswij
Fix `to_string_in_format_args` with macro call receiver

Fixes part of #12837

changelog: none
2024-06-07 09:52:17 +00:00
bors
0f87a81882 Auto merge of #12822 - Alexendoo:for-each-expr, r=dswij
Make `for_each_expr` visit closures by default, rename the old version `for_each_expr_without_closures`

A lot of the time `for_each_expr` is picked when closures should be visited so I think it makes sense for this to be the default with the alternative available for when you don't need to visit them.

The first commit renames `for_each_expr` to `for_each_expr_without_closures` and `for_each_expr_with_closures` to `for_each_expr`

The second commit switches a few uses that I caught over to include closures to fix a few bugs

changelog: none
2024-06-07 09:42:37 +00:00
Renato Lochetti
5b63ab1131
Lint manual_unwrap_or_default for Result as well 2024-06-06 21:33:37 +01:00
Samuel Tardieu
35b2aa99f3 Add required parentheses around method receiver 2024-06-06 20:53:08 +02:00
Samuel Tardieu
1e23449678 Move is_receiver_of_method_call to clippy_utils for reuse 2024-06-06 20:09:21 +02:00
bors
4e7f97467a Auto merge of #12827 - Alexendoo:lint-groups-priority, r=Jarcho
`lint_groups_priority`: ignore lints & groups at the same level

Fixes #12270

changelog: none
2024-06-06 12:09:58 +00:00
bors
6cfd4ac955 Auto merge of #10632 - Alexendoo:needless-maybe-sized, r=Jarcho
Add `needless_maybe_sized` lint

changelog: new lint: [`needless_maybe_sized`]

Closes #10600
2024-06-05 20:11:03 +00:00
bors
d955d0a41f Auto merge of #12891 - paultag:paultag/fix-lint-description, r=Manishearth
Fix grammer for the Safety documentation check

The original message ("unsafe function's docs miss `# Safety` section") reads quite awkwardly. I've changed it to "unsafe function's docs are missing a `# Safety` section" to have it read better.

```
changelog: [`missing_headers`]: Tweak the grammar in the lint message
```
2024-06-05 20:00:59 +00:00
bors
1105e9debe Auto merge of #12700 - Luv-Ray:overly_complex_bool_expr, r=Jarcho
[`overly_complex_bool_expr`]: Fix trigger wrongly on never type

fixes #12689

---

changelog: fix [`overly_complex_bool_expr`] triggers wrongly on never type
2024-06-05 19:47:43 +00:00
bors
bc00d7b94d Auto merge of #12845 - cookie-s:dedup-boolmethods-diags, r=Jarcho
Dedup nonminimal_bool_methods diags

Relates to #12379

Fix `nonminimal_bool` lint so that it doesn't check the same span multiple times.

`NotSimplificationVisitor` was called for each expression from `NonminimalBoolVisitor` whereas `NotSimplificationVisitor` also recursively checked all expressions.

---

changelog: [`nonminimal_bool`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics
2024-06-05 19:09:55 +00:00
Paul R. Tagliamonte
35e2027a35 Fix grammer for the Safety documentation check
The original message ("unsafe function's docs miss `# Safety` section")
reads quite awkwardly. I've changed it to "unsafe function's docs are missing
a `# Safety` section" to have it read better.

Signed-off-by: Paul R. Tagliamonte <paultag@gmail.com>
2024-06-05 14:11:56 -04:00
bors
10d1f32685 Auto merge of #12886 - GuillaumeGomez:fix-needless_character_iteration, r=blyxyas
Fix false positive for `needless_character_iteration` lint

Fixes #12879.

changelog: Fix false positive for `needless_character_iteration` lint
2024-06-05 13:12:39 +00:00
xFrednet
d47ab9f9c9
Update version attribute for 1.79 lints 2024-06-05 13:51:42 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
158b65889c Fix false positive for needless_character_iteration lint 2024-06-04 21:12:08 +02:00
y21
708ef7955d only run flop lints on inherent method calls 2024-06-03 21:42:00 +02:00
bors
4f3180adac Auto merge of #12875 - y21:deprecate_cfg_lints, r=flip1995
Deprecate `maybe_misused_cfg` and `mismatched_target_os`

All cases that these two lints would catch are now caught by cargo/rustc's own check-cfg feature.

This was previously discussed on zulip: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Deprecate.20maybe_misused_cfg.20and.20mismatched_target_os

For the most part, this PR was automated with `cargo dev deprecate`

r? `@flip1995` cc `@Urgau`

changelog: deprecate [`maybe_misused_cfg`] and [`mismatched_target_os`]
2024-06-03 08:57:34 +00:00
bors
61d3e14718 Auto merge of #12815 - GuillaumeGomez:add-needless_character_iteration, r=xFrednet
Add `needless_character_iteration` lint

Fixes #4817.

r? `@xFrednet`

changelog: Add `needless_character_iteration` lint
2024-06-03 08:09:18 +00:00
bors
568f4fc732 Auto merge of #12871 - Jacherr:issue-12768, r=blyxyas
Modify str_to_string to be machine-applicable

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12768

I'm not sure if there is any potential for edge cases with this - since it only ever acts on `&str` types I can't think of any, and especially since the methods do the same thing anyway.

changelog: allow `str_to_string` lint to be automatically applied
2024-06-02 21:11:06 +00:00
y21
f950961c42 deprecate mismatched_target_os 2024-06-01 14:11:07 +02:00
y21
4aa20d2e95 deprecate maybe_misused_cfg 2024-06-01 13:44:13 +02:00
Jacher
5d0fcfbf56 modify str_to_string to be machine-applicable 2024-06-01 09:05:27 +00:00
bors
28e887fe71 Auto merge of #12488 - Jacherr:issue-11525, r=llogiq
Disable `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11525

Disables `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls, specifically any implementations that also do not have a `get` method anywhere along the deref chain (so, for example, it still lints on Vec, which has its `get` method as part of the deref chain).

Thanks `@y21` for pointing me in the right direction with a couple of handy util functions for deref chain and inherent methods, saved a headache there!

changelog: FP: Disable `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls
2024-05-31 16:42:50 +00:00
bors
0b598b636b Auto merge of #12865 - J-ZhengLi:issue12853, r=y21
fix [`redundant_closure`] suggesting incorrect code with `F: Fn()`

fixes: #12853

---

changelog: fix [`redundant_closure`] suggesting incorrect code with `F: Fn()`
2024-05-31 15:23:39 +00:00
bors
e7efe4381a Auto merge of #12857 - WeiTheShinobi:non_canonical_impls, r=y21
fix: let non_canonical_impls skip proc marco

Fixed #12788

Although the issue only mentions `NON_CANONICAL_CLONE_IMPL`, this fix will also affect `NON_CANONICAL_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL` because I saw
> Because of these unforeseeable or unstable behaviors, macro expansion should often not be regarded as a part of the stable API.

on Clippy Documentation and these two lints are similar, so I think it might be good, not sure if it's right or not.

---

changelog: `NON_CANONICAL_CLONE_IMPL`, `NON_CANONICAL_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL` will skip proc marco now
2024-05-30 15:58:48 +00:00
WeiTheShinobi
1038927b47 fix: add test case, use a better conditional expression. 2024-05-30 23:40:17 +08:00
Jacher
1c117f12ea ignore generics in handling 2024-05-30 13:15:25 +00:00
Jacherr
ae59f5002d add additional testcases 2024-05-30 11:45:57 +00:00
Jacherr
e186ed2ad1 check return type of get and indexing 2024-05-30 11:45:57 +00:00
Jacherr
93b39d8910 disable indexing_slicing for custom Index impls 2024-05-30 11:45:43 +00:00
bors
03654badfd Auto merge of #12864 - tesuji:non-no-effect, r=y21
ignore array from `deref_addrof` lint

Split from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12854

changelog: ignore array from `deref_addrof` lint

r? y21
2024-05-30 10:16:50 +00:00
Philipp Krones
89037ea18f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into rustup 2024-05-30 09:44:14 +02:00
Lzu Tao
8bd2a17dfe ignore array from deref_addrof lint
Note that semantics of repeat expr in array are the same
2024-05-30 08:34:44 +07:00
bors
bda7427621 Auto merge of #125360 - RalfJung:packed-field-reorder, r=fmease
don't inhibit random field reordering on repr(packed(1))

`inhibit_struct_field_reordering_opt` being false means we exclude this type from random field shuffling. However, `packed(1)` types can still be shuffled! The logic was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48528 since it's pointless to reorder fields in packed(1) types (there's no padding that could be saved) -- but that shouldn't inhibit `-Zrandomize-layout` (which did not exist at the time).

We could add an optimization elsewhere to not bother sorting the fields for `repr(packed)` types, but I don't think that's worth the effort.

This *does* change the behavior in that we may now reorder fields of `packed(1)` structs (e.g. if there are niches, we'll try to move them to the start/end, according to `NicheBias`).  We were always allowed to do that but so far we didn't. Quoting the [reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/type-layout.html):

> On their own, align and packed do not provide guarantees about the order of fields in the layout of a struct or the layout of an enum variant, although they may be combined with representations (such as C) which do provide such guarantees.
2024-05-29 11:57:13 +00:00
J-ZhengLi
db30f6ce9f fix [redundant_closure] suggesting incorrect code with F: Fn() 2024-05-29 16:21:59 +08:00
bors
da4b2127c0 Auto merge of #12859 - cookie-s:dedup-single-char-name-diag, r=Alexendoo
[`many_single_char_names`]: Deduplicate diagnostics

Relates to #12379

Fix `many_single_char_names` lint so that it doesn't emit diagnostics when the current level of the scope doesn't contain any single character name.

```rust
let (a, b, c, d): (i32, i32, i32, i32);
match 1 {
  1 => (),
  e => {},
}
```
produced the exact same MANY_SINGLE_CHAR_NAMES diagnostic at each of the Arm `e => {}` and the Block `{}`.

---

changelog: [`many_single_char_names`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics
2024-05-28 12:41:14 +00:00
bors
76eee82e79 Auto merge of #12823 - schvv31n:fix-iter-on-empty-collections, r=y21
Suppress `iter_on_empty_collections` if the iterator's concrete type is relied upon

changelog: fixed #12807
2024-05-27 16:18:41 +00:00
bors
7e4c1ae0b6 Auto merge of #12843 - mdm:fix-unnecessary-to-owned-println-interaction, r=y21
Fix `unnecessary_to_owned` interaction with macro expansion

fixes #12821

In the case of an unnecessary `.iter().cloned()`, the lint `unnecessary_to_owned` might suggest to remove the `&` from references without checking if such references are inside a macro expansion. This can lead to unexpected behavior or even broken code if the lint suggestion is applied blindly. See issue #12821 for an example.

This PR checks if such references are inside macro expansions and skips this part of the lint suggestion in these cases.

changelog: [`unnecessary_to_owned`]: Don't suggest to remove `&` inside macro expansion
2024-05-27 14:26:50 +00:00