Commit graph

4856 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lukas Lueg
584000a792 Use approx_ty_size for large_enum_variant 2022-09-03 00:16:28 +02:00
bors
c36696ac02 Auto merge of #9418 - lukaslueg:issue9415, r=llogiq
Fix `mut_mutex_lock` when Mutex is behind immutable deref

I *think* the problem here is the `if let ty::Ref(_, _, Mutability::Mut) = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(recv).kind()` line tries to check if the `Mutex` can be mutably borrowed (there already is a test for `Arc<Mutex<_>>`), but gets bamboozled by the `&mut Arc` indirection. And I *think* checking the deref-adjustment to filter immutable-adjust (the deref through the `Arc`, starting from `&mut Arc`) is the correct fix.

Fixes #9415

changelog: Fix `mut_mutex_lock` when Mutex is behind immutable deref
2022-09-02 18:54:06 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
ffc75af4cd Fix mut_mutex_lock for Mutex behind imm deref
Fixes #9415
2022-09-02 20:39:47 +02:00
bors
958a9cf297 Auto merge of #9417 - Jarcho:ice_9414, r=Alexendoo
Don't use `hir_ty_to_ty` in `result_large_err`

fixes #9414

This occurs starting with 2022-09-01. I checked that this does fix the ICE on rust-lang/rust@9353538. Not sure which pr caused the late-bound region to leak through `hir_ty_to_ty`.

changelog: None
2022-09-02 18:07:38 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
bd70ccf915 Don't use hir_ty_to_ty in result_large_err as it sometimes leaves late-bound lifetimes. 2022-09-02 13:40:35 -04:00
Dmitrii Lavrov
b1f86a49ea
New lint bool_to_int_with_if 2022-09-01 23:23:56 +02:00
bors
a80e278036 Auto merge of #9404 - lukaslueg:issue9402, r=giraffate
Fix `suboptimal_float` not linting on `{const}.powf({const})`

There used to be an early return if the receiver was an effective const but the method was not linted, not taking into account later cases where the receiver and the arguments are both effective consts for different methods. Removed the early return.

Fixes #9402
Fixes #9201

changelog: Fix `suboptimal_flops`, `imprecise_flops` not linting on `{const}.powf({const})` et al
2022-09-01 13:18:17 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
6e14e60af4 Fix {subopt,imprec}_float not lint const.*(const)
Fixes #9402
Fixes #9201
2022-09-01 12:51:13 +02:00
Jason Newcomb
d4a0785464 Correctly handle unescape warnings 2022-09-01 00:00:37 -04:00
Tim Siegel
28a055dcea
match_wild_err_arm: Fix typo in note text 2022-08-31 09:09:11 -04:00
bors
f51aade56f Auto merge of #9397 - Jarcho:trait_dup_order, r=dswij
Fix the emission order of `trait_duplication_in_bounds`

Makes the lint emit in source order rather than whatever order the hash map happens to be in. This is currently blocking the sync into rustc.

changelog: None
2022-08-31 08:07:33 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
66a97055b2 Initial implementation of result_large_err 2022-08-30 17:39:40 +02:00
Jason Newcomb
19ef04ff5d Fix the order of trait_duplication_in_bounds
* Emit the lint in source order
* Make suggestions with multiple traits be in source order rather than alphabetical
2022-08-30 00:33:56 -04:00
bors
4df6032100 Auto merge of #9394 - lukaslueg:issue9391, r=Jarcho
Fix missing parens in `suboptimal_flops` suggestion

Fixes #9391. The problem is simple enough, I didn't check if the same problem occurs elsewhere, though.

changelog: fix missing parenthesis in `suboptimal_flops` suggestion
2022-08-30 00:37:45 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
9ffc5a5c8d Fix more parens for suboptimal_flops suggs 2022-08-29 22:36:11 +02:00
bors
e1ecdb621c Auto merge of #9395 - Alexendoo:suspicious-to-owned-test, r=Manishearth
Fix `suspicious_to_owned` test when `c_char` is `u8`

e.g. on aarch64 linux

changelog: none
2022-08-29 19:26:22 +00:00
clubby789
30979bfe83 Add lint cast_slice_from_raw_parts 2022-08-29 14:10:17 +01:00
Alex Macleod
c5a82304cf Fix suspicious_to_owned test when c_char is u8 2022-08-29 12:17:08 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
26a6891925 Fix missing parens in suboptimal_flops sugg
Fixes #9391
2022-08-29 13:56:03 +02:00
bors
58bbb1a95d Auto merge of #9385 - rust-lang:unnecessary-cast-remove-parens, r=Alexendoo
remove parenthesis from `unnecessary_cast` suggestion

This fixes #9380.

---

changelog: none
2022-08-29 11:49:08 +00:00
bors
28ec27b33a Auto merge of #9388 - Jarcho:rustup, r=Jarcho
Rustup

Hopefully this is done right.

changelog: None
2022-08-29 01:51:23 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
3ad398d9b0 Merge branch 'master' into rustup 2022-08-28 06:44:13 -04:00
Lukas Lueg
c542f1fe3f Don't lint literal None from expansion 2022-08-28 12:18:50 +02:00
bors
8d9da4d7c7 Auto merge of #9276 - dswij:9164, r=flip1995
Ignore `match_like_matches_macro` when there is comment

Closes #9164

changelog: [`match_like_matches_macro`] is ignored when there is some comment inside the match block.

Also add `span_contains_comment` util to check if given span contains comments.
2022-08-28 07:08:18 +00:00
bors
2d4d8e16cd Auto merge of #8984 - xanathar:pr/suspicious_to_owned, r=llogiq
Implemented `suspicious_to_owned` lint to check if `to_owned` is called on a `Cow`

changelog: Add lint ``[`suspicious_to_owned`]``

-----------------
Hi,
posting this unsolicited PR as I've been burned by this issue :)
Being unsolicited, feel free to reject it or reassign a different lint level etc.

This lint checks whether `to_owned` is called on `Cow<'_, _>`. This is done because `to_owned` is very similarly named to `into_owned`, but the effect of calling those two methods is completely different (one makes the `Cow::Borrowed` into a `Cow::Owned`, the other just clones the `Cow`). If the cow is then passed to code for which the type is not checked (e.g. generics, closures, etc.) it might slip through and if the cow data is coming from an unsafe context there is the potential for accidentally cause undefined behavior.
Even if not falling into this painful case, there's really no reason to call `to_owned` on a `Cow` other than confusing people reading the code: either `into_owned` or `clone` should be called.

Note that this overlaps perfectly with `implicit_clone` as a warning, but `implicit_clone` is classified pedantic (while the consequences for `Cow` might be of a wider blast radius than just pedantry); given the overlap, I set-up the lint so that if `suspicious_to_owned` triggers `implicit_clone` will not trigger. I'm not 100% sure this is done in the correct way (I tried to copy what other lints were doing) so please provide feedback on it if it isn't.

### Checklist

- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
2022-08-27 17:38:40 +00:00
dswij
b07d72b69e Ignore when there is comment 2022-08-28 00:07:00 +08:00
Andre Bogus
90fe3bea52 remove parenthesis from unnecessary_cast suggestion 2022-08-27 12:04:19 +02:00
Marco Mastropaolo
de028e2fb9 Implemented suspicious_to_owned lint to check if to_owned is called on a Cow.
This is done because `to_owned` is very similarly named to `into_owned`, but the
effect of calling those two methods is completely different. This creates
confusion (stemming from the ambiguity of the 'owned' term in the context of
`Cow`s) and might not be what the writer intended.
2022-08-26 17:41:17 -07:00
Lukas Lueg
fe93b8d001 Don't lint needless_return if return has attrs
Fixes #9361
2022-08-26 19:06:07 +02:00
bors
21f103abcc Auto merge of #9379 - royrustdev:multi_assignments, r=llogiq
new lint

This fixes #6576

If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.

- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`

---

changelog: add [`multi_assignments`] lint
2022-08-26 12:05:57 +00:00
royrustdev
fb7dffeac9 add multi_assignments lint 2022-08-26 17:05:52 +05:30
Joshua Nelson
345c42a2d6 Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
Alex Macleod
2cb5318e97 Rename manual_empty_string_creation and move to pedantic 2022-08-23 14:19:46 +00:00
Samuel E. Moelius III
687fcf14c4 Fix to_string_in_format_args false positive 2022-08-21 19:38:09 +00:00
bors
cc637bacfa Auto merge of #9092 - tamaroning:fix-needless-match, r=llogiq
Fix false positives of needless_match

closes: #9084
made needless_match take into account arm in the form of `_ if => ...`

changelog: none
2022-08-21 13:22:21 +00:00
bors
e19a05cbb3 Auto merge of #8992 - kyoto7250:fix_8753, r=flip1995
feat(fix): Do not lint if the target code is inside a loop

close #8753

we consider the following code.

```rust
fn main() {
    let vec = vec![1];
    let w: Vec<usize> = vec.iter().map(|i| i * i).collect();  // <- once.

    for i in 0..2 {
        let _ = w.contains(&i);
    }
}
```

and the clippy will issue the following warning.

```rust
warning: avoid using `collect()` when not needed
 --> src/main.rs:3:51
  |
3 |     let w: Vec<usize> = vec.iter().map(|i| i * i).collect();
  |                                                   ^^^^^^^
...
6 |         let _ = w.contains(&i);
  |                 -------------- the iterator could be used here instead
  |
  = note: `#[warn(clippy::needless_collect)]` on by default
  = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#needless_collect
help: check if the original Iterator contains an element instead of collecting then checking
  |
3 ~
4 |
5 |     for i in 0..2 {
6 ~         let _ = vec.iter().map(|i| i * i).any(|x| x == i);
```

Rewrite the code as indicated.

```rust
fn main() {
    let vec = vec![1];

    for i in 0..2 {
        let _ = vec.iter().map(|i| i * i).any(|x| x == i);  // <- execute `map` every loop.
    }
}
```

this code is valid in the compiler, but, it is different from the code before the rewrite.
So, we should not lint, If `collect` is outside of a loop.

Thank you in advance.

---

changelog: Do not lint if the target code is inside a loop in `needless_collect`
2022-08-21 09:58:24 +00:00
kyoto7250
5048af7a3a
feat(fix): Do not lint if the target code is inside a loop 2022-08-21 10:47:03 +02:00
Philipp Krones
1f75845a8f
Reduce indentation and add comment about lint name 2022-08-21 10:29:26 +02:00
tamaron
f7a376e4fc Update needless_match.stderr 2022-08-21 17:26:39 +09:00
J-ZhengLi
ffe7125163
and check for Result 2022-08-21 10:24:30 +02:00
J-ZhengLi
5d403c0b85
allow check for match in lint [option_if_let_else]
and add test case for `Result`
2022-08-21 10:24:27 +02:00
Samuel E. Moelius III
6f3d398e13 Add test for #8855 2022-08-20 15:21:32 +00:00
bors
5820addb24 Auto merge of #9269 - nahuakang:collapsible_str_replace, r=flip1995
Lint `collapsible_str_replace`

fixes #6651

```
changelog: [`collapsible_str_replace`]: create new lint `collapsible_str_replace`
```

If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.

- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
2022-08-20 13:44:35 +00:00
Nahua Kang
b070b4045f Simplify lint logic and address code review comments 2022-08-20 12:09:09 +02:00
bors
2091142f5d Auto merge of #9258 - Serial-ATA:unused-peekable, r=Alexendoo
Add [`unused_peekable`] lint

changelog: Add [`unused_peekable`] lint
closes: #854
2022-08-19 18:30:13 +00:00
Nahua Kang
fb30b64f63 Adjust test cases; run cargo dev bless 2022-08-19 20:00:20 +02:00
Nahua Kang
c989746ccf Remove checks on char slice; improve lint suggestion 2022-08-19 20:00:20 +02:00
Nahua Kang
a9bd0bd321 Handle repeated str::replace calls with single char kind to str 2022-08-19 20:00:19 +02:00
Nahua Kang
6e86687529 Handle replace calls with char slices 2022-08-19 19:55:28 +02:00
Nahua Kang
89698b9613 Extend and improve initial test cases for collapsible_str_replace 2022-08-19 19:49:16 +02:00