Commit graph

15172 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
291f75e1fb Auto merge of #9406 - Jarcho:unescape_ice, r=Manishearth
Correctly handle unescape warnings

fixes #9405

changelog: Fix ICE when format literals raise compiler warnings
2022-09-01 04:12:00 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
d4a0785464 Correctly handle unescape warnings 2022-09-01 00:00:37 -04:00
bors
5b784f8ed2 Auto merge of #101249 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-wahnoz8, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100787 (Pretty printing give proper error message without panic)
 - #100838 (Suggest moving redundant generic args of an assoc fn to its trait)
 - #100844 (migrate rustc_query_system to use SessionDiagnostic)
 - #101140 (Update Clippy)
 - #101161 (Fix uintended diagnostic caused by `drain(..)`)
 - #101165 (Use more `into_iter` rather than `drain(..)`)
 - #101229 (Link “? operator” to relevant chapter in The Book)
 - #101230 (lint: avoid linting diag functions with diag lints)
 - #101236 (Avoid needless buffer zeroing in `std::sys::windows::fs`)
 - #101240 (Fix a typo on `wasm64-unknown-unknown` doc)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-31 21:45:18 +00:00
bors
c782767d47 Auto merge of #9403 - softmoth:wild_err_expect, r=Alexendoo
match_wild_err_arm: Fix typo in note text

changelog: [`match_wild_err_arm`]: fix typo in note text
2022-08-31 13:53:39 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
7bd5b012c7 Use CountIsStart in clippy 2022-08-31 09:45:51 -04:00
Jason Newcomb
fb41bfa774 Merge commit 'f51aade56f93175dde89177a92e3669ebd8e7592' into clippyup 2022-08-31 09:24:45 -04:00
Ralf Jung
7298de2568 fix a clippy test 2022-08-31 15:24:40 +02:00
Tim Siegel
28a055dcea
match_wild_err_arm: Fix typo in note text 2022-08-31 09:09:11 -04:00
bors
f51aade56f Auto merge of #9397 - Jarcho:trait_dup_order, r=dswij
Fix the emission order of `trait_duplication_in_bounds`

Makes the lint emit in source order rather than whatever order the hash map happens to be in. This is currently blocking the sync into rustc.

changelog: None
2022-08-31 08:07:33 +00:00
bors
7ba06ec9c5 Auto merge of #98919 - 5225225:stricter-invalid-value, r=RalfJung
Strengthen invalid_value lint to forbid uninit primitives, adjust docs to say that's UB

For context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66151#issuecomment-1174477404=

This does not make it a FCW, but it does explicitly state in the docs that uninit integers are UB.

This also doesn't affect any runtime behavior, uninit u32's will still successfully be created through mem::uninitialized.
2022-08-30 20:39:01 +00:00
bors
09e4659a86 Auto merge of #9373 - lukaslueg:result_large_err, r=Alexendoo
Initial implementation `result_large_err`

This is a shot at #6560, #4652, and #3884. The lint checks for `Result` being returned from functions/methods where the `Err` variant is larger than a configurable threshold (the default of which is 128 bytes). There has been some discussion around this, which I'll try to quickly summarize:

* A large `Err`-variant may force an equally large `Result` if `Err` is actually bigger than `Ok`.
* There is a cost involved in large `Result`, as LLVM may choose to `memcpy` them around above a certain size.
* We usually expect the `Err` variant to be seldomly used, but pay the cost every time.
* `Result` returned from library code has a high chance of bubbling up the call stack, getting stuffed into `MyLibError { IoError(std::io::Error), ParseError(parselib::Error), ...}`, exacerbating the problem.

This PR deliberately does not take into account comparing the `Ok` to the `Err` variant (e.g. a ratio, or one being larger than the other). Rather we choose an absolute threshold for `Err`'s size, above which we warn. The reason for this is that `Err`s probably get `map_err`'ed further up the call stack, and we can't draw conclusions from the ratio at the point where the `Result` is returned. A relative threshold would also be less predictable, while not accounting for the cost of LLVM being forced to generate less efficient code if the `Err`-variant is _large_ in absolute terms.

We lint private functions as well as public functions, as the perf-cost applies to in-crate code as well.

In order to account for type-parameters, I conjured up `fn approx_ty_size`. The function relies on `LateContext::layout_of` to compute the actual size, and in case of failure (e.g. due to generics) tries to come up with an "at least size". In the latter case, the size of obviously wrong, but the inspected size certainly can't be smaller than that. Please give the approach a heavy dose of review, as I'm not actually familiar with the type-system at all (read: I have no idea what I'm doing).

The approach does, however flimsy it is, allow us to successfully lint situations like

```rust
pub union UnionError<T: Copy> {
    _maybe: T,
    _or_perhaps_even: (T, [u8; 512]),
}

// We know `UnionError<T>` will be at least 512 bytes, no matter what `T` is
pub fn param_large_union<T: Copy>() -> Result<(), UnionError<T>> {
    Ok(())
}
```

I've given some refactoring to `functions/result_unit_err.rs` to re-use some bits. This is also the groundwork for #6409

The default threshold is 128 because of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4652#issue-505670554

`lintcheck` does not trigger this lint for a threshold of 128. It does warn for 64, though.

The suggestion currently is the following, which is just a placeholder for discussion to be had. I did have the computed size in a `span_label`. However, that might cause both ui-tests here and lints elsewhere to become flaky wrt to their output (as the size is platform dependent).

```
error: the `Err`-variant returned via this `Result` is very large
  --> $DIR/result_large_err.rs:36:34
   |
LL | pub fn param_large_error<R>() -> Result<(), (u128, R, FullyDefinedLargeError)> {
   |                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The `Err` variant is unusually large, at least 128 bytes
```

changelog: Add [`result_large_err`] lint
2022-08-30 18:20:45 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
66a97055b2 Initial implementation of result_large_err 2022-08-30 17:39:40 +02:00
Jason Newcomb
19ef04ff5d Fix the order of trait_duplication_in_bounds
* Emit the lint in source order
* Make suggestions with multiple traits be in source order rather than alphabetical
2022-08-30 00:33:56 -04:00
bors
4df6032100 Auto merge of #9394 - lukaslueg:issue9391, r=Jarcho
Fix missing parens in `suboptimal_flops` suggestion

Fixes #9391. The problem is simple enough, I didn't check if the same problem occurs elsewhere, though.

changelog: fix missing parenthesis in `suboptimal_flops` suggestion
2022-08-30 00:37:45 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
9ffc5a5c8d Fix more parens for suboptimal_flops suggs 2022-08-29 22:36:11 +02:00
5225225
98fe5f7c7d Fix tests due to stricter invalid_value 2022-08-29 21:28:35 +01:00
bors
e1ecdb621c Auto merge of #9395 - Alexendoo:suspicious-to-owned-test, r=Manishearth
Fix `suspicious_to_owned` test when `c_char` is `u8`

e.g. on aarch64 linux

changelog: none
2022-08-29 19:26:22 +00:00
bors
e9f7ce1f91 Auto merge of #9247 - clubby789:raw_slice_pointer_cast, r=Alexendoo
New lint: Raw slice pointer cast

Adds a lint to check for a raw slice being created and cast back to a pointer, suggesting `ptr::slice_from_raw_parts`, to identify UB such as https://github.com/SimonSapin/rust-typed-arena/pull/54.
```
changelog: [`cast_slice_from_raw_parts`]: Add lint to check for `slice::from_raw_parts(.., ..) as *const _`
```
2022-08-29 18:07:50 +00:00
Nilstrieb
ce847beb47 Revert let_chains stabilization
This reverts commit 326646074940222d602f3683d0559088690830f4.

This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
2022-08-29 19:34:11 +02:00
clubby789
cc9f203543
Update clippy_lints/src/casts/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <alex@macleod.io>
2022-08-29 15:17:23 +01:00
clubby789
30979bfe83 Add lint cast_slice_from_raw_parts 2022-08-29 14:10:17 +01:00
Alex Macleod
c5a82304cf Fix suspicious_to_owned test when c_char is u8 2022-08-29 12:17:08 +00:00
Lukas Lueg
26a6891925 Fix missing parens in suboptimal_flops sugg
Fixes #9391
2022-08-29 13:56:03 +02:00
bors
58bbb1a95d Auto merge of #9385 - rust-lang:unnecessary-cast-remove-parens, r=Alexendoo
remove parenthesis from `unnecessary_cast` suggestion

This fixes #9380.

---

changelog: none
2022-08-29 11:49:08 +00:00
bors
28ec27b33a Auto merge of #9388 - Jarcho:rustup, r=Jarcho
Rustup

Hopefully this is done right.

changelog: None
2022-08-29 01:51:23 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
e5507390b7 Disable incremental compilation on CI 2022-08-28 19:22:46 -04:00
Nicholas Nethercote
3ce109e12d Use &'hir Ty everywhere.
For consistency, and because it makes HIR measurement simpler and more
accurate.
2022-08-29 06:35:14 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
3b80e994d5 Use &'hir Expr everywhere.
For consistency, and because it makes HIR measurement simpler and more
accurate.
2022-08-29 06:35:14 +10:00
bors
4e31c8cab4 Auto merge of #9389 - lukaslueg:penmacro, r=llogiq
Don't lint literal `None` from expansion

This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9288#issuecomment-1229398524: If the literal `None` is from expansion, we never lint. This is correct because e.g. replacing the call to `option_env!` with whatever that macro expanded to at the time of linting is certainly wrong.

changelog: Don't lint [`partialeq_to_none`] for macro-expansions
2022-08-28 10:59:16 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
9790a3291b Fixes for latest nightly 2022-08-28 06:44:22 -04:00
Jason Newcomb
278b0920d8 Bump nightly version -> 2022-08-27 2022-08-28 06:44:22 -04:00
Jason Newcomb
3ad398d9b0 Merge branch 'master' into rustup 2022-08-28 06:44:13 -04:00
Lukas Lueg
c542f1fe3f Don't lint literal None from expansion 2022-08-28 12:18:50 +02:00
bors
8d9da4d7c7 Auto merge of #9276 - dswij:9164, r=flip1995
Ignore `match_like_matches_macro` when there is comment

Closes #9164

changelog: [`match_like_matches_macro`] is ignored when there is some comment inside the match block.

Also add `span_contains_comment` util to check if given span contains comments.
2022-08-28 07:08:18 +00:00
bors
2d4d8e16cd Auto merge of #8984 - xanathar:pr/suspicious_to_owned, r=llogiq
Implemented `suspicious_to_owned` lint to check if `to_owned` is called on a `Cow`

changelog: Add lint ``[`suspicious_to_owned`]``

-----------------
Hi,
posting this unsolicited PR as I've been burned by this issue :)
Being unsolicited, feel free to reject it or reassign a different lint level etc.

This lint checks whether `to_owned` is called on `Cow<'_, _>`. This is done because `to_owned` is very similarly named to `into_owned`, but the effect of calling those two methods is completely different (one makes the `Cow::Borrowed` into a `Cow::Owned`, the other just clones the `Cow`). If the cow is then passed to code for which the type is not checked (e.g. generics, closures, etc.) it might slip through and if the cow data is coming from an unsafe context there is the potential for accidentally cause undefined behavior.
Even if not falling into this painful case, there's really no reason to call `to_owned` on a `Cow` other than confusing people reading the code: either `into_owned` or `clone` should be called.

Note that this overlaps perfectly with `implicit_clone` as a warning, but `implicit_clone` is classified pedantic (while the consequences for `Cow` might be of a wider blast radius than just pedantry); given the overlap, I set-up the lint so that if `suspicious_to_owned` triggers `implicit_clone` will not trigger. I'm not 100% sure this is done in the correct way (I tried to copy what other lints were doing) so please provide feedback on it if it isn't.

### Checklist

- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
2022-08-27 17:38:40 +00:00
dswij
b07d72b69e Ignore when there is comment 2022-08-28 00:07:00 +08:00
dswij
51e9113c60 Add span_contains_comments util 2022-08-28 00:07:00 +08:00
Andre Bogus
90fe3bea52 remove parenthesis from unnecessary_cast suggestion 2022-08-27 12:04:19 +02:00
bors
be8bd60000 Auto merge of #9381 - lukaslueg:issue9361, r=dswij
Don't lint `needless_return` if `return` has attrs

Fixes #9361

The lint used to have a mechanic to allow `cfg`-attrs on naked `return`-statements. This was well-intentioned, yet we can have any kind of attribute, e.g. `allow`, `expect` or even custom `derive`. So the mechanic was simply removed. We now never lint on a naked `return`-statement that has attributes on it.

Turns out that the ui-test had a Catch22 in it: In `check_expect()` the `#[expect(clippy::needless_return)]` is an attribute on the `return` statement that can and will be rustfixed away without side effects. But any other attribute would also have been removed, which is what #9361 is about. The test proved the wrong thing. Removed the test, the body is tested elsewhere as well.

changelog: Ignore [`needless_return`] on `return`s with attrs
2022-08-27 08:37:29 +00:00
Marco Mastropaolo
de028e2fb9 Implemented suspicious_to_owned lint to check if to_owned is called on a Cow.
This is done because `to_owned` is very similarly named to `into_owned`, but the
effect of calling those two methods is completely different. This creates
confusion (stemming from the ambiguity of the 'owned' term in the context of
`Cow`s) and might not be what the writer intended.
2022-08-26 17:41:17 -07:00
Lukas Lueg
fe93b8d001 Don't lint needless_return if return has attrs
Fixes #9361
2022-08-26 19:06:07 +02:00
bors
602bec26b0 Auto merge of #9374 - sk1p:patch-1, r=Jarcho
uninit_vec: Vec::spare_capacity_mut is stable

Quick documentation fix: `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` no longer needs nightly.

changelog: none
2022-08-26 13:15:58 +00:00
Tomasz Miąsko
e4eddc611a Replace Body::basic_blocks() with field access 2022-08-26 14:27:08 +02:00
bors
21f103abcc Auto merge of #9379 - royrustdev:multi_assignments, r=llogiq
new lint

This fixes #6576

If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.

- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`

---

changelog: add [`multi_assignments`] lint
2022-08-26 12:05:57 +00:00
royrustdev
fb7dffeac9 add multi_assignments lint 2022-08-26 17:05:52 +05:30
Alexander Clausen
61aa4efbf1
uninit_vec: Vec::spare_capacity_mut is stable
Quick documentation fix: `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` no longer needs nightly.
2022-08-25 14:10:55 +02:00
Yuki Okushi
2cdc54d265 Rollup merge of #99332 - jyn514:stabilize-label-break-value, r=petrochenkov
Stabilize `#![feature(label_break_value)]`

See the stabilization report in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1186213313.
2022-08-25 08:50:54 +09:00
bors
79a439a48a Auto merge of #9370 - mikerite:20220824_ty_contains, r=Jarcho
Replace `contains_ty(..)` with `Ty::contains(..)`

This removes some code we don't need and the method syntax is
also more readable IMO.

changelog: none
2022-08-24 13:34:32 +00:00
Michael Wright
a0afbdfbec Replace contains_ty(..) with Ty::contains(..)
This removes some code we don't need and the method syntax is
also more readable IMO.
2022-08-24 08:11:29 +02:00
Joshua Nelson
345c42a2d6 Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00