`manual_try_fold`: check that `fold` is really `Iterator::fold`
Fix#11876
changelog: [`manual_try_fold`]: suggest using `try_fold` only for `Iterator::fold` uses
Create new lint `option_map_or_err_ok`
Fixes#10045.
For the following code:
```rust
let opt = Some(1);
opt.map_or(Err("error"), Ok);
```
It suggests to instead write:
```rust
let opt = Some(1);
opt.ok_or("error");
```
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: Create new lint `option_map_or_err_ok`
suggest alternatives to iterate an array of ranges
works towards #7125
changelog: [`single_element_loop`]: suggest better syntax when iterating over an array of a single range
`@thinkerdreamer` and myself worked on this issue during a workshop by `@llogiq` at the RustLab 2023 conference. It is our first contribution to clippy.
When iterating over an array of only one element, _which is a range_, our change suggests to replace the array with the contained range itself. Additionally, a hint is printed stating that the user probably intended to iterate over the range and not the array. If the single element in the array is not a range, the previous suggestion in the form of `let {pat_snip} = {prefix}{arg_snip};{block_str}`is used.
This change lints the array with the single range directly, so any prefixes or suffixes are covered as well.
[`deprecated_semver`]: Allow `#[deprecated(since = "TBD")]`
"TBD" is allowed by rustdoc, saying that it will be deprecated in a future version. rustc will also not actually warn on it.
I found this while checking the rust-lang/rust with clippy.
changelog: [`deprecated_semver`]: allow using `since = "TBD"`
[`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: work with bodies instead of blocks separately
Fixes#11856
Before this change, this lint would check blocks independently of each other, which means that it misses `assert!()`s from parent blocks.
```rs
// check_block
assert!(x.len() > 1);
{
// check_block
// no assert here
let _ = x[0] + x[1];
}
```
This PR changes it to work with bodies rather than individual blocks. That means that a function will be checked in one go and we can remember if an `assert!` occurred anywhere.
Eventually it would be nice to have a more control flow-aware analysis, possibly by rewriting it as a MIR lint, but that's more complicated and I wanted this fixed first.
changelog: [`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: accept `assert!`s from parent blocks
Fix iter_kv_map false positive into_keys and into_values suggestion
fixes: #11752
changelog: [`iter_kv_map`]: fix false positive: Don't suggest `into_keys()` and `into_values()` if the MSRV is to low
Add tests for issues #10285, #10286, #10289, #10287Fixes#10285.
Fixes#10286.
Fixes#10289.
Fixes#10287.
This PR simply adds tests for the listed issues as they're already implemented so we can close them.
r? `@blyxyas`
changelog:none
Split `doc.rs` up into a subdirectory
So, first, sorry for the bad diff. 😅
In #11798, `@flip1995` suggested splitting `doc.rs` up, much like how we have the `methods/`, `matches/`, `types/` subdirectories.
I agree with this, the file is getting bigger as we add more and more doc lints that it makes sense to do this refactoring.
This is purely an internal change that moves things around a bit.
(**EDIT:** depending on the outcome of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11801#issuecomment-1816715615 , this may change the lint group name from `doc_markdoc` to `doc`).
I tried to not change any of the actual logic of the lints and as such some things weren't as easy to move to a separate file. So we still have some `span_lint*` calls in the `doc/mod.rs` file, which I think is fine. This is also the case in `methods/mod.rs`.
Also worth mentioning that the lints missing_errors_doc, missing_panics_doc, missing_safety_doc and unnecessary_safety_doc have a lot of the same logic so it didn't make much sense for each of these to be in their own file. Instead I just put them all in `missing_headers.rs`
I also added a bit of documentation to the involved `check_{attrs,doc}` methods.
changelog: none
Improve maybe misused cfg
Follow-up of the improvements that were suggested to me in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11821:
* I unified the output to use the same terms.
* I updated the code to prevent creating a new symbol.
r? `@blyxyas`
changelog: [`maybe_misued_cfg`]: Output and code improvements
Verify Borrow<T> semantics for types that implement Hash, Borrow<str> and Borrow<[u8]>.
Fixes#11710
The essence of the issue is that types that implement Borrow<T> provide a facet or a representation of the underlying type. Under these semantics `hash(a) == hash(a.borrow())`.
This is a problem when a type implements `Borrow<str>`, `Borrow<[u8]>` and Hash, it is expected that the hash of all three types is identical. The problem is that the hash of [u8] is not the same as that of a String, even when the byte reference ([u8]) is derived from `.as_bytes()`
- [x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [x] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- [x] Added lint documentation
- [x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
- [x] Explanation of the issue in the code
- [x] Tests reproducing the issue
- [x] Lint rule and emission
---
changelog: New lint: [`impl_hash_borrow_with_str_and_bytes`]
[#11781](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11781)
Implements a lint to prevent implementation of Hash, Borrow<str> and
Borrow<[u8]> as it breaks Borrow<T> "semantics". According to the book,
types that implement Borrow<A> and Borrow<B> must ensure equality of
borrow results under Eq,Ord and Hash.
> In particular Eq, Ord and Hash must be equivalent for borrowed and
owned values: x.borrow() == y.borrow() should give the same result as x == y.
In the same way, hash(x) == hash(x as Borrow<[u8]>) != hash(x as Borrow<str>).
changelog: newlint [`impl_hash_with_borrow_str_and_bytes`]
clippy::suboptimal_flops used to not check if the second parameter to f32/f64.mul_add() was float. Since the method is
only defined to take `Self` as paremters, the suggestion was wrong.
Fixes#11831
teach `eager_or_lazy` about panicky arithmetic operations
Fixes#9422Fixes#9814Fixes#11793
It's a bit sad that we have to do this because arithmetic operations seemed to me like the prime example where a closure would not be necessary, but this has "side effects" (changes behavior when going from lazy to eager) as some of these panic on overflow/underflow if compiled with `-Coverflow-checks` (which is the default in debug mode).
Given the number of backlinks in the mentioned issues, this seems to be a FP that is worth fixing, probably.
changelog: [`unnecessary_lazy_evaluations`]: don't lint if closure has panicky arithmetic operations
Extend `maybe_misused_cfg` lint over `cfg(test)`
Fixes#11240.
One thought I had is that we could use the levenshtein distance (of 1) to ensure this is indeed `test` that was targeted. But maybe it's overkill, not sure.
changelog: [`maybe_misused_cfg`]: Extend lint over `cfg(test)`
r? `@blyxyas`
This was made possible by the removal of plugin support, which
simplified lint store creation.
This simplifies the places in rustc and rustdoc that call
`describe_lints`, which are early on. The lint store is now built before
those places, so they don't have to create their own lint store for
temporary use, they can just use the main one.
Change `if_same_then_else` to be a `style` lint
CC #3770
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3770#issuecomment-687565594 (`@flip1995):`
> Oh I thought I replied to this: I definitely see now that having this
> as a correctness lint might be the wrong categorization. What we might
> want to do is to just allow this lint, if there are comments in the
> arm bodies. But a good first step would be to downgrade this lint to
> style or complexity. I would vote for style since merging two arms is
> not always less complex.
changelog: [`if_same_then_else`]: Change to be a `style` lint
[`impl_trait_in_params`]: avoid ICE when function with `impl Trait` type has no parameters
Fixes#11803
If I'm reading the old code correctly, it was taking the span of the first parameter (without checking that it exists, which caused the ICE) and uses that to figure out where the generic parameter to insert should go (cc `@blyxyas` you wrote the lint, is that correct?).
This seemed equivalent to just `generics.span`, which doesn't require calculating the spans like that and simplifies it a fair bit
changelog: don't ICE when function has no parameters but generics have an `impl Trait` type
CC #3770
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3770#issuecomment-687565594 (@flip1995):
> Oh I thought I replied to this: I definitely see now that having this
> as a correctness lint might be the wrong categorization. What we might
> want to do is to just allow this lint, if there are comments in the
> arm bodies. But a good first step would be to downgrade this lint to
> style or complexity. I would vote for style since merging two arms is
> not always less complex.
Implement new lint `iter_over_hash_type`
Implements and fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11788
This PR adds a new *restriction* lint `iter_over_hash_type` which prevents `Hash`-types (that is, `HashSet` and `HashMap`) from being used as the iterator in `for` loops.
The justification for this is because in `Hash`-based types, the ordering of items is not guaranteed and may vary between executions of the same program on the same hardware. In addition, it reduces readability due to the unclear iteration order.
The implementation of this lint also ensures the following:
- Calls to `HashMap::keys`, `HashMap::values`, and `HashSet::iter` are also denied when used in `for` loops,
- When this expression is used in procedural macros, it is not linted/denied.
changelog: add new `iter_over_hash_type` lint to prevent unordered iterations through hashed data structures
Don't check for late-bound vars, check for escaping bound vars
Fixes an assertion that didn't make sense. Many valid and well-formed types *have* late-bound vars (e.g. `for<'a> fn(&'a ())`), they just must not have *escaping* late-bound vars in order to be normalized correctly.
Addresses rust-lang/rust-clippy#11230, cc `@jyn514` and `@matthiaskrgr`
changelog: don't check for late-bound vars, check for escaping bound vars. Addresses rust-lang/rust-clippy#11230
Fixes to `manual_let_else`'s divergence check
A few changes to the divergence check in `manual_let_else` and moves it the implementation to `clippy_utils` since it's generally useful:
* Handle internal `break` and `continue` expressions.
e.g. The first loop is divergent, but the second is not.
```rust
{
loop {
break 'outer;
};
}
{
loop {
break;
};
}
```
* Match rust's definition of divergence which is defined via the type system.
e.g. The following is not considered divergent by rustc as the inner block has a result type of `()`:
```rust
{
'a: {
panic!();
break 'a;
};
}
```
* Handle when adding a single semicolon would make the expression divergent.
e.g. The following would be a divergent if a semicolon were added after the `if` expression:
```rust
{ if panic!() { 0 } else { 1 } }
```
changelog: None
Lint `needless_borrow` and `explicit_auto_deref` on most union field accesses
Changes both lints to follow rustc's rules around auto-deref through `ManuallyDrop` union fields rather than just bailing on union fields.
changelog: [`needless_borrow`] & [`explicit_auto_deref`]: Lint on most union field accesses
[`map_identity`]: respect match ergonomics
Fixes#11764
Note: the original tests before this were slightly wrong themselves already and had to be changed. They were calling `map` on an iterator of `&(i32, i32)`s, so this PR would stop linting there, but they were meant to test something else unrelated to binding modes, so I just changed them to remove the references so that it iterates over owned values and they all bind by value. This way they continue to test what they checked for before: the identity function for tuple patterns.
changelog: [`map_identity`]: respect match ergonomics
Disable `vec_box` when using different allocators
Fixes#7114
This PR disables the `vec_box` lint when the `Box` and `Vec` use different allocators (but not when they use the same - custom - allocator).
For example - `Vec<Box<i32, DummyAllocator>>` will disable the lint, and `Vec<Box<i32, DummyAllocator>, DummyAllocator>` will not disable the lint.
In addition, the applicability of this lint has been changed to `Unspecified` due to the automatic fixes potentially breaking code such as the following:
```rs
fn foo() -> Vec<Box<i32>> { // -> Vec<i32>
vec![Box::new(1)]
}
```
It should be noted that the `if_chain->let-chains` fix has also been applied to this lint, so the diff does contain many changes.
changelog: disable `vec_box` lint when using nonstandard allocators
Fix `dbg_macro` semi span calculation
`span_including_semi` was using a `BytePos` to index into a file's source which happened to work because the root file of the test started at `BytePos` 0, it didn't work for other files
changelog: none
new lint: `unnecessary_fallible_conversions`
Closes#11577
A new lint that looks for calls such as `i64::try_from(1i32)` and suggests `i64::from(1i32)`. See lint description (and linked issue) for more details for why.
There's a tiny bit of overlap with the `useless_conversion` lint, in that the other one warns `T::try_from(T)` (i.e., fallibly converting to the same type), so this lint ignores cases like `i32::try_from(1i32)` to avoid emitting two warnings for the same expression.
Also, funnily enough, with this one exception, this lint would warn on exactly every case in the `useless_conversion_try` ui test that `useless_conversion` didn't cover (but never two warnings at the same time), which is neat. I did add an `#![allow]` though since we don't want interleaved warnings from multiple lints in the same uitest.
changelog: new lint: `unnecessary_fallible_conversions`
fix enum_variant_names depending lint depending on order
changelog: [`enum_variant_names`]: fix single word variants preventing lint of later variant pre/postfixed with the enum name
fixes#11494
Single word variants prevented checking the `check_enum_start` and `check_enum_end` for being run on later variants
Fix missing parenthesis in suboptimal floating point help
This fixes#11559 by adding a branch in the `Neg` implementation for `Sugg` that adds parentheses to keep precedence in order, then using that in the suggestion. I also removed some needless `.to_string()`s while I was at it.
---
changelog: none
[`iter_without_into_iter`]: fix papercuts in suggestion and restrict linting to exported types
See #11692 for more context.
tldr: the lint `iter_without_into_iter` has suggestions that don't compile, which imo isn't that problematic because it does have the appropriate `Applicability` that tells external tools that it shouldn't be auto-applied.
However there were some obvious "errors" in the suggestion that really should've been included in my initial PR adding the lint, which is fixed by this PR:
- `IntoIterator::into_iter` needs a `self` argument.
- `IntoIterator::Iter` associated type doesn't exist. This should've just been `Item`.
This still doesn't make it machine applicable, and the remaining things are imho quite non-trivial to implement, as I've explained in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11692#issuecomment-1773886111.
I personally think it's fine to leave it there and let the user change the remaining errors when copy-pasting the suggestion (e.g. errors caused by lifetimes that were permitted in fn return-position but are not in associated types).
This is how many of our other lint suggestions already work.
Also, we now restrict linting to only exported types. This required moving basically all of the tests around since they were previously in the `main` function. Same for `into_iter_without_iter`. The git diff is a bit useless here...
changelog: [`iter_without_into_iter`]: fix papercuts in suggestion and restrict linting to exported types
(cc `@lopopolo,` figured I should mention you since you created the issue)
Add `waker_clone_and_wake` lint to check needless `Waker` clones
Check for patterns of `waker.clone().wake()` and replace them with `waker.wake_by_ref()`.
An alternative name could be `waker_clone_then_wake`
changelog: [ `waker_clone_wake`]: new lint
Validate `feature` and `since` values inside `#[stable(…)]`
Previously the string passed to `#[unstable(feature = "...")]` would be validated as an identifier, but not `#[stable(feature = "...")]`. In the standard library there were `stable` attributes containing the empty string, and kebab-case string, neither of which should be allowed.
Pre-existing validation of `unstable`:
```rust
// src/lib.rs
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
#[unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
pub struct Struct;
```
```console
error[E0546]: 'feature' is not an identifier
--> src/lib.rs:5:1
|
5 | #![unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
For an `unstable` attribute, the need for an identifier is obvious because the downstream code needs to write a `#![feature(...)]` attribute containing that identifier. `#![feature(kebab-case)]` is not valid syntax and `#![feature(kebab_case)]` would not work if that is not the name of the feature.
Having a valid identifier even in `stable` is less essential but still useful because it allows for informative diagnostic about the stabilization of a feature. Compare:
```rust
// src/lib.rs
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![stable(feature = "kebab-case", since = "1.0.0")]
#[stable(feature = "kebab-case", since = "1.0.0")]
pub struct Struct;
```
```rust
// src/main.rs
#![feature(kebab_case)]
use repro::Struct;
fn main() {}
```
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `kebab_case`
--> src/main.rs:3:12
|
3 | #![feature(kebab_case)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
vs the situation if we correctly use `feature = "snake_case"` and `#![feature(snake_case)]`, as enforced by this PR:
```console
warning: the feature `snake_case` has been stable since 1.0.0 and no longer requires an attribute to enable
--> src/main.rs:3:12
|
3 | #![feature(snake_case)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(stable_features)]` on by default
```
report `unused_import` for empty reexports even it is pub
Fixes#116032
An easy fix. r? `@petrochenkov`
(Discovered this issue while reviewing #115993.)
suggest passing function instead of calling it in closure for [`option_if_let_else`]
fixes: #11429
changelog: suggest passing function instead of calling it in closure for [`option_if_let_else`]
Avoid a `track_errors` by bubbling up most errors from `check_well_formed`
I believe `track_errors` is mostly papering over issues that a sufficiently convoluted query graph can hit. I made this change, while the actual change I want to do is to stop bailing out early on errors, and instead use this new `ErrorGuaranteed` to invoke `check_well_formed` for individual items before doing all the `typeck` logic on them.
This works towards resolving https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97477 and various other ICEs, as well as allowing us to use parallel rustc more (which is currently rather limited/bottlenecked due to the very sequential nature in which we do `rustc_hir_analysis::check_crate`)
cc `@SparrowLii` `@Zoxc` for the new `try_par_for_each_in` function
Skip if_not_else lint for '!= 0'-style checks
Currently, clippy makes unhelpful suggestions such as this:
```
warning: unnecessary `!=` operation
--> src/vm.rs:598:36
|
598 | *destination = if source & 0x8000 != 0 { 0xFFFF } else { 0 };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: change to `==` and swap the blocks of the `if`/`else`
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#if_not_else
= note: `-W clippy::if-not-else` implied by `-W clippy::pedantic`
```
Bit tests often take on the form `if foo & 0x1234 != 0 { … } else { … }`, and the `!= 0` part reads as "has any bits set". Therefore, this code already has the "correct" order, and shouldn't be changed.
This PR disables the lint for these cases, and in fact all cases where the condition is "foo is non-zero".
I did my homework:
- \[X] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming] → Not applicable, this PR fixes an existing lint
- \[X] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file) → Yes, `tests/ui/if_not_else_bittest.rs`
- \[X] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[X] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[X] Added lint documentation → Not applicable, this PR fixes an existing lint
- \[X] Run `cargo dev fmt`
changelog: Fix [`if_not_else`] false positive when something like `bitflags != 0` is used
[`map_identity`]: allow closure with type annotations
Fixes#9122
`.map(|a: u32| a)` can help type inference, so we should probably allow this and not warn about "unnecessary map of the identity function"
changelog: [`map_identity`]: allow closure with type annotations
add lint for struct field names
changelog: [`struct_field_names`]: lint structs with the same pre/postfix in all fields or with fields that are pre/postfixed with the name of the struct.
fixes#2555
I've followed general structure and naming from the code in [enum_variants](b788addfcc/clippy_lints/src/enum_variants.rs) lint, which implements the same logic for enum variants.
side effect for `enum_variants`:
use .first() instead of .get(0) in enum_variants lint
move to_camel_case to str_util module
move module, enum and struct name repetitions check to a single file `item_name_repetitions`
rename enum_variants threshold config option
Add regression test for #11610 about mutable usage of argument in async function for the `needless_pass_by_ref_mut` lint
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11610.
This was already fixed. I simply added a regression test.
changelog: Add regression test for #11610 about mutable usage of argument in async function for the `needless_pass_by_ref_mut` lint
Make `multiple_unsafe_ops_per_block` ignore await desugaring
The await desugaring contains two calls (`Poll::new_unchecked` and `get_context`) inside a single unsafe block. That violates the lint.
fixes#11312
changelog: [`multiple_unsafe_ops_per_block`]: fix false positives in `.await`
[`unnecessary_lazy_eval`]: reduce applicability if closure has return type annotation
Fixes#11672
We already check if closure parameters don't have type annotations and reduce the applicability to `MaybeIncorrect` if they do, since those help type inference and removing them breaks code. We didn't do this for return type annotations however. This PR adds it. This doesn't change it to produce a fix that will compile, but it will prevent rustfix from auto-applying it.
(In general I'm not sure if we can suggest a fix that will compile. In this specific example, it might be possible to suggest `&[] as &[u8]`, but as-casts won't always work, e.g. `Default::default() as &[u8]` is a compile error, so just reducing applicability should be a safe fix in any case for now)
changelog: [`unnecessary_lazy_eval`]: reduce applicability to `MaybeIncorrect` if closure has return type annotation
[`get_first`]: lint on non-primitive slices
Fixes#11594
I left the issue open for a couple days before making the PR to see if anyone has something to say, but it looks like there aren't any objections to removing this check that prevented linting on non-primitive slices, so here's the PR now.
There's a couple of instances in clippy itself where we now emit the lint. The actual relevant change is in the first commit and fixing the `.get(0)` instances in clippy itself is in the 2nd commit.
changelog: [`get_first`]: lint on non-primitive slices
Fix/11134
Fix#11134
Hir of `qpath` will be `TypeRelative(Ty { kind: Path(LangItem...` when a closure contains macro (e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11651) and #11134, it causes panic.
This PR avoids panicking and emitting incomplete path string when `qpath` contains `LangItem`.
changelog: none
`impl_trait_in_params` now supports impls and traits
Before this PR, the lint `impl_trait_in_params`. This PR gives the lint support for functions in impls and traits. (Also, some pretty heavy refactor)
fixes#11548
changelog:[`impl_trait_in_params`] now supports `impl` blocks and functions in traits
Improve `redundant_locals` help message
Fixes#11625
AFAIK, `span_lint_and_help` points the beginning of spans when we pass multiple spans to the second argument, so This PR I also modified its help span and its message.
lint result of the given example in the issue will be:
```console
error: redundant redefinition of a binding `apple`
--> src/main.rs:5:5
|
5 | let apple = apple;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: `apple` is initially defined here
--> src/main.rs:4:9
|
4 | let apple = 42;
| ^^^^^
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#redundant_locals
```
I hope that this change might help reduce user confusion, but I'd appreciate alternative suggestions:)
changelog: [`redundant_locals`]: Now points at the rebinding of the variable
Fix `items_after_test_module` for non root modules, add applicable suggestion
Fixes#11050Fixes#11153
changelog: [`items_after_test_module`]: Now suggests a machine-applicable suggestion.
changelog: [`items:after_test_module`]: Also lints for non root modules
std_instead_of_core: avoid lint inside of proc-macro
- fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10198
note: The lint for the reported `thiserror::Error` has been suppressed by [Don't lint unstable moves in std_instead_of_core](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9545/files#diff-2cb8a24429cf9d9898de901450d640115503a10454d692dddc6a073a299fbb7eR29) because `thiserror::Error` internally implements `std::error::Error for (derived struct)`.
changelog: [`std_intead_of_core`]: avoid linting inside proc-macro
I confirmed this change fixes the problem:
<details>
<summary>test result without the change</summary>
```console
error: used import from `std` instead of `core`
--> tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.rs:65:14
|
LL | #[derive(ImplStructWithStdDisplay)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `ImplStructWithStdDisplay` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
</details>
Move `needless_pass_by_ref_mut`: `suspicious` -> `nursery`
[Related to [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/needless_pass_by_ref_mut.20isn't.20ready.20for.20stable)]
`needless_pass_by_ref_mut` has been released with some important bugs (notably having a lot of reported false positives and an ICE). So it may not be really ready for being in stable until these problems are solved. This PR changes the lint's category from `suspicious` to `nursery`, just that.
changelog: none
Partially outline code inside the panic! macro
This outlines code inside the panic! macro in some cases. This is split out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115562 to exclude changes to rustc.
There are cases where users create a unit variant for the purposes
of tracking the number of variants for an nonexhaustive enum.
We should check if an enum is explicitly marked as nonexhaustive
before reporting `manual_non_exhaustive` in these cases. Fixes#11583
new lint: `into_iter_without_iter`
Closes#9736 (part 2)
This implements the other lint that my earlier PR missed: given an `IntoIterator for &Type` impl, check that there exists an inherent `fn iter(&self)` method.
changelog: new lint: `into_iter_without_iter`
r? `@Jarcho` since you reviewed #11527 I figured it makes sense for you to review this as well?
[`manual_let_else`]: only omit block if span is from same ctxt
Fixes#11579.
The lint already had logic for omitting a block in `else` if a block is already present, however this didn't handle the case where the block is from a different expansion/syntax context. E.g.
```rs
macro_rules! panic_in_block {
() => { { panic!() } }
}
let _ = match Some(1) {
Some(v) => v,
_ => panic_in_block!()
};
```
It would see this in its expanded form as `_ => { panic!() }` and think it doesn't have to include a block in its suggestion because it is already there, however that's not true if it's from a different expansion like in this case.
changelog: [`manual_let_else`]: only omit block in suggestion if the block is from the same expansion
fixed fp caused by moving &mut reference inside of a closure
changelog: [`needless_pass_by_ref mut`]: fixes false positive caused by not covering mutable references passed to a closure inside of a fuction
fixes#11545
Remove most usage of `hir_ty_to_ty`
Removes the usages where there's a suitable query or the type was already available elsewhere. The remaining cases would all require more involved changes
changelog: none
r? `@Jarcho`
fix FP with needless_raw_string_hashes
changelog: Fix [`needless_raw_string_hashes`]: Continue the lint checking of raw string when `needless_raw_strings` is allowed.
fix#11420
[`redundant_guards`]: lint if the pattern is on the left side
A tiny improvement to the `redundant_guards` lint. There's no associated issue for this, just noticed it while going through the code.
Right now it warns on `Some(x) if x == 2` and suggests `Some(2)`, but it didn't do that for `Some(x) if 2 == x` (i.e. when the local is on the right side and the pattern on the left side).
changelog: [`redundant_guards`]: also lint if the pattern is on the left side
Change defaults of `accept-comment-above-statement` and `accept-comment-above-attributes`
This patch sets the two configuration options for `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` to `true` by default: these are `accept-comment-above-statement` and `accept-comment-above-attributes`. Having these values `false` by default prevents what many users would consider clean code, e.g. placing the `// SAFETY:` comment above a single-line functino call, rather than directly next to the argument.
This was originally discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11162
changelog: [`undocumented_unsafe_blocks`]: set
`accept-comment-above-statement` and `accept-comment-above-attributes` to `true` by default.
Fix mutaby used async function argument in closure for `needless_pass_by_ref_mut`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11380.
The problem was that it needed to go through closures as well in async functions to correctly find the mutable usage of async function arguments.
changelog: Correctly handle mutable usage of async function arguments in closures.
r? `@Centri3`
This patch sets the two configuration options for
`undocumented_unsafe_blocks` to `true` by default: these are
`accept-comment-above-statement` and `accept-comment-above-attributes`.
Having these values `false` by default prevents what many users would
consider clean code, e.g. placing the `// SAFETY:` comment above a
single-line functino call, rather than directly next to the argument.
changelog: [`undocumented_unsafe_blocks`]: set
`accept-comment-above-statement` and `accept-comment-above-attributes`
to `true` by default.
Add redundant_as_str lint
This lint checks for `as_str` on a `String` immediately followed by `as_bytes` or `is_empty` as those methods are available on `String` too. This could possibly also be extended to `&[u8]` in the future.
changelog: New lint [`redundant_as_str`] #11526
move required_consts check to general post-mono-check function
This factors some code that is common between the interpreter and the codegen backends into shared helper functions. Also as a side-effect the interpreter now uses the same `eval` functions as everyone else to get the evaluated MIR constants.
Also this is in preparation for another post-mono check that will be needed for (the current hackfix for) https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115709: ensuring that all locals are dynamically sized.
I didn't expect this to change diagnostics, but it's just cycle errors that change.
r? `@oli-obk`
This lint checks for `as_str` on a `String` immediately followed by `as_bytes` or `is_empty` as those methods are available on `String` too. This could possibly also be extended to `&[u8]` in the future.
Split `needless_borrow` into two lints
Splits off the case where the borrow is used as a generic argument to a function. I think the two cases are different enough to warrant a separate lint.
The tests for the new lint have been reordered to group related parts together. Two warning have been dropped, one looked like it was testing the generic argument form, but it ends up triggering the auto-deref variant. The second was just a redundant test that didn't do anything interesting.
An issue with cycle detection is also included. The old version was checking if a cycle was reachable from a block when it should have been checking if the block is part or a cycle.
As a side note, I'm liking the style of just jamming all the tests into separate scopes in main.
changelog: Split off `needless_borrows_for_generic_args` from `needless_borrow`
[`filter_map_bool_then`]: include multiple derefs from adjustments
In #11506 this lint was improved to suggest one deref if the bool is behind references (fixed the FP #11503), however it might need multiple dereferences if the bool is behind multiple layers of references or custom derefs. E.g. `&&&bool` needs `***b`.
changelog: [`filter_map_bool_then`]: suggest as many dereferences as there are needed to get to the bool
add extra `byref` checking for the guard's local
changelog: [`redundant_guards`]: Now checks if the variable is bound using `ref` before linting.
The lint should not be emitted, when the local variable is bind by-ref in the pattern.
fixes#11465
[`useless_conversion`]: don't lint if type parameter has unsatisfiable bounds for `.into_iter()` receiver
Fixes#11300.
Before this PR, clippy assumed that if it sees a `f(x.into_iter())` call and the type at that argument position is generic over any `IntoIterator`, then the `.into_iter()` call must be useless because `x` already implements `IntoIterator`, *however* this assumption is not right if the generic parameter has more than just the `IntoIterator` bound (because other traits can be implemented for the IntoIterator target type but not the IntoIterator implementor, as can be seen in the linked issue: `<[i32; 3] as IntoIterator>::IntoIter` satisfies `ExactSizeIterator`, but `[i32; 3]` does not).
So, this PR makes it check that the type parameter only has a single `IntoIterator` bound. It *might* be possible to check if the type of `x` in `f(x.into_iter())` satisfies all the bounds on the generic type parameter as defined on the function (which would allow removing the `.into_iter()` call even with multiple bounds), however I'm not sure how to do that, and the current fix should always work.
**Edit:** This PR has been changed to check if any of the bounds don't hold for the type of the `.into_iter()` receiver, so we can still lint in some cases.
changelog: [`useless_conversion`]: don't lint `.into_iter()` if type parameter has multiple bounds
fix filter_map_bool_then with a bool reference
changelog: [`filter_map_bool_then`]: Fix the incorrect autofix when the `bool` in question is a reference.
fix#11503
[`extra_unused_type_parameters`]: Fix edge case FP for parameters in where bounds
Generic parameters can end up being used on the left side of where-bounds if they are not directly bound but instead appear nested in some concrete generic type. Therefore, we should walk the left side of where bounds, but only if the bounded type is *not* a generic param, in which case we still need to ignore the bound.
Fixes#11302
changelog: [`extra_unused_type_parameters`]: Fix edge case false positive for parameters in where bounds
[`len_without_is_empty`]: follow type alias to find inherent `is_empty` method
Fixes#11165
When we see an `impl B` and `B` is a type alias to some type `A`, then we need to follow the type alias to look for an `is_empty` method on the aliased type `A`. Before this PR, it'd get the inherent impls of `B`, which there aren't any and so it would warn that there isn't an `is_empty` method even if there was one.
Passing the type alias `DefId` to `TyCtxt::type_of` gives us the aliased `DefId` (or simply return the type itself if it wasn't a type alias) so we can just use that
changelog: [`len_without_is_empty`]: follow type alias to find inherent `is_empty` method
[`implied_bounds_in_impls`]: include (previously omitted) associated types in suggestion
Fixes#11435
It now includes associated types from the implied bound that were omitted in the second bound. Example:
```rs
fn f() -> impl Iterator<Item = u8> + ExactSizeIterator> {..}
```
Suggestion before this change:
```diff
- pub fn my_iter() -> impl Iterator<Item = u32> + ExactSizeIterator {
+ pub fn my_iter() -> impl ExactSizeIterator {
```
It didn't include `<Item = u32>` on `ExactSizeIterator`. Now, with this change, it does.
```diff
- pub fn my_iter() -> impl Iterator<Item = u32> + ExactSizeIterator {
+ pub fn my_iter() -> impl ExactSizeIterator<Item = u32> {
```
We also now extend the span to include not just possible `+` ahead of it, but also behind it (an example for this is in the linked issue as well).
**Note:** The overall diff is a bit noisy, because building up the suggestion involves quite a bit more logic now and I decided to extract that into its own function. For that reason, I split this PR up into two commits. The first commit contains the actual "logic" changes. Second commit just moves code around.
changelog: [`implied_bounds_in_impls`]: include (previously omitted) associated types in suggestion
changelog: [`implied_bounds_in_impls`]: include the `+` behind bound if it's the last bound
Rename incorrect_impls to non_canonical_impls, move them to warn by default
The wording/category of these feel too strong to me, I would expect most of the time it's linting the implementations aren't going to be *incorrect*, just unnecessary
changelog: rename `incorrect_clone_impl_on_copy_type` to [`non_canonical_clone_impl`]
changelog: rename `incorrect_partial_ord_impl_on_ord_type` to [`non_canonical_partial_ord_impl`]
changelog: Move [`non_canonical_clone_impl`], [`non_canonical_partial_ord_impl`] to suspicious
