The word "active" is currently used in two different and confusing ways:
- `ACTIVE_FEATURES` actually means "available unstable features"
- `Features::active_features` actually means "features declared in the
crate's code", which can include feature within `ACTIVE_FEATURES` but
also others.
(This is also distinct from "enabled" features which includes declared
features but also some edition-specific features automatically enabled
depending on the edition in use.)
This commit changes the `Features::active_features` to
`Features::declared_features` which actually matches its meaning.
Likewise, `Features::active` becomes `Features::declared`.
std_instead_of_core: avoid lint inside of proc-macro
- fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10198
note: The lint for the reported `thiserror::Error` has been suppressed by [Don't lint unstable moves in std_instead_of_core](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9545/files#diff-2cb8a24429cf9d9898de901450d640115503a10454d692dddc6a073a299fbb7eR29) because `thiserror::Error` internally implements `std::error::Error for (derived struct)`.
changelog: [`std_intead_of_core`]: avoid linting inside proc-macro
I confirmed this change fixes the problem:
<details>
<summary>test result without the change</summary>
```console
error: used import from `std` instead of `core`
--> tests/ui/std_instead_of_core.rs:65:14
|
LL | #[derive(ImplStructWithStdDisplay)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `ImplStructWithStdDisplay` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
</details>
Move `needless_pass_by_ref_mut`: `suspicious` -> `nursery`
[Related to [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/needless_pass_by_ref_mut.20isn't.20ready.20for.20stable)]
`needless_pass_by_ref_mut` has been released with some important bugs (notably having a lot of reported false positives and an ICE). So it may not be really ready for being in stable until these problems are solved. This PR changes the lint's category from `suspicious` to `nursery`, just that.
changelog: none
Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when enum is `#[non_exhaustive]`
Fixes#11583
changelog: Fix [`manual_non_exhaustive`] false positive for unit enum variants when enum is explicitly `non_exhaustive`.
Partially outline code inside the panic! macro
This outlines code inside the panic! macro in some cases. This is split out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115562 to exclude changes to rustc.
There are cases where users create a unit variant for the purposes
of tracking the number of variants for an nonexhaustive enum.
We should check if an enum is explicitly marked as nonexhaustive
before reporting `manual_non_exhaustive` in these cases. Fixes#11583
new lint: `into_iter_without_iter`
Closes#9736 (part 2)
This implements the other lint that my earlier PR missed: given an `IntoIterator for &Type` impl, check that there exists an inherent `fn iter(&self)` method.
changelog: new lint: `into_iter_without_iter`
r? `@Jarcho` since you reviewed #11527 I figured it makes sense for you to review this as well?
Assorted improvements for `rustc_middle::mir::traversal`
r? `@cjgillot`
I'm not _entirely_ sure about all changes, although I do like all of them. If you'd like I can drop some commits. Best reviewed on a commit-by-commit basis, I think, since they are fairly isolated.
[`manual_let_else`]: only omit block if span is from same ctxt
Fixes#11579.
The lint already had logic for omitting a block in `else` if a block is already present, however this didn't handle the case where the block is from a different expansion/syntax context. E.g.
```rs
macro_rules! panic_in_block {
() => { { panic!() } }
}
let _ = match Some(1) {
Some(v) => v,
_ => panic_in_block!()
};
```
It would see this in its expanded form as `_ => { panic!() }` and think it doesn't have to include a block in its suggestion because it is already there, however that's not true if it's from a different expansion like in this case.
changelog: [`manual_let_else`]: only omit block in suggestion if the block is from the same expansion
Clippy backport: Move needless_raw_string_hashes to pedantic
Really small backport this time. Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11415#issuecomment-1739880932
I'd rather get this in 1.74 than waiting another release cycle.
r? `@Manishearth`
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` This should be merged before beta is branched tomorrow.
new lint: `iter_without_into_iter`
Closes#9736
A new lint that looks for `iter` (and `iter_mut`) method implementations without the type implementing `IntoIterator` for `&Type`.
Imo this seems rather pedantic, so I went with that, but I can be convinced to change it to `style` like the linked issue asked for.
Writing a machine applicable suggestion seems a bit tricky and tedious, so for now this relies on the user adding remaining lifetimes.
changelog: new lint: `iter_without_into_iter`
