Don't lint `assertions_on_constants` on any const assertions
close#12816close#12847
cc #12817
----
changelog: Fix false positives in consts for `assertions_on_constants` and `unnecessary_operation`.
`manual_inspect`: fix `clippy::version` from 1.78.0 to 1.81.0
Although `manual_inspect`'s PR started some months ago, the lint is only available in the current nightly (1.81.0), rather than 1.78.0.
```
changelog: [`manual_inspect`]: fix `clippy::version` from 1.78.0 to 1.81.0
```
Although `manual_inspect`'s PR started some months ago, the lint is only
available in the current nightly (1.81.0), rather than 1.78.0.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Rename `super_predicates_of` and similar queries to `explicit_*` to note that they're not elaborated
Rename:
* `super_predicates_of` -> `explicit_super_predicates_of`
* `implied_predicates_of` -> `explicit_implied_predicates_of`
* `supertraits_containing_assoc_item` -> `explicit_supertraits_containing_assoc_item`
This makes it clearer that, unlike (for example) [`TyCtxt::super_traits_of`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/context/struct.TyCtxt.html#method.super_traits_of), we don't automatically elaborate this set of predicates.
r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@oli-obk`` or someone from t-types idc
Tighten `fn_decl_span` for async blocks
Tightens the span of `async {}` blocks in diagnostics, and subsequently async closures and async fns, by actually setting the `fn_decl_span` correctly. This is kinda a follow-up on #125078, but it fixes the problem in a more general way.
I think the diagnostics are significantly improved, since we no longer have a bunch of overlapping spans. I'll point out one caveat where I think the diagnostic may get a bit more confusing, but where I don't think it matters.
r? ````@estebank```` or ````@oli-obk```` or someone else on wg-diag or compiler i dont really care lol
This change addresses cases where doc comments are separated
by blank lines, comments, or non-doc-comment attributes,
like this:
```rust
/// - first line
// not part of doc comment
/// second line
```
Before this commit, Clippy gave a pedantically-correct
warning about how you needed to indent the second line.
This is unlikely to be what the user intends, and has
been described as a "false positive" (since Clippy is
warning you about a highly unintuitive behavior that
Rustdoc actually has, we definitely want it to output
*something*, but the suggestion to indent was poor).
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12917
Eliminate the distinction between PREC_POSTFIX and PREC_PAREN precedence level
I have been tangling with precedence as part of porting some pretty-printer improvements from syn back to rustc (related to parenthesization of closures, returns, and breaks by the AST pretty-printer).
As far as I have been able to tell, there is no difference between the 2 different precedence levels that rustc identifies as `PREC_POSTFIX` (field access, square bracket index, question mark, method call) and `PREC_PAREN` (loops, if, paths, literals).
There are a bunch of places that look at either `prec < PREC_POSTFIX` or `prec >= PREC_POSTFIX`. But there is nothing that needs to distinguish PREC_POSTFIX and PREC_PAREN from one another.
d49994b060/compiler/rustc_ast/src/util/parser.rs (L236-L237)d49994b060/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs (L2829)d49994b060/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs (L1290)
In the interest of eliminating a distinction without a difference, this PR collapses these 2 levels down to 1.
There is exactly 1 case where an expression with PREC_POSTFIX precedence needs to be parenthesized in a location that an expression with PREC_PAREN would not, and that's when the receiver of ExprKind::MethodCall is ExprKind::Field. `x.f()` means a different thing than `(x.f)()`. But this does not justify having separate precedence levels because this special case in the grammar is not governed by precedence. Field access does not have "lower precedence than" method call syntax — you can tell because if it did, then `x.f[0].f()` wouldn't be able to have its unparenthesized field access in the receiver of a method call. Because this Field/MethodCall special case is not governed by precedence, it already requires special handling and is not affected by eliminating the PREC_POSTFIX precedence level.
d49994b060/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state/expr.rs (L217-L221)
resolve `clippy::invalid_paths` on `bool::then`
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: none
Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`
Fixes#12928.
If this not a "simple" pattern, better not emit the lint.
changelog: Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`
This removes the ICE codepaths for `f16` and `f128` in Clippy.
`rustc_apfloat` is used as a dependency for the parsing of these types,
since their `FromStr` implementation will not be available in the
standard library for a while.
Add more types to `is_from_proc_macro`
I've been running through going through all the lint implementations to clean them up. I'll be separating out the changes into small PRs to make reviewing easier.
changelog: none
Lint `manual_unwrap_or` for it let cases
This PR modifies `manual_unwrap_or` to lint for `if let` cases as well. This effort is part of the fixes desired by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12618
changelog:[`manual_unwrap_or`]: Lint for `if let` cases.
Rework `octal_escapes`
Main changes are not doing UTF-8 decoding, noting each occurrence as an individual lint emission, and narrowing the span to point to the escape itself.
changelog: none
Fix ICE in `upper_case_acronyms`
fixes#12284
The logic has been rewritten to avoid allocations. The old version allocated multiple vecs and strings for each identifier. The new logic allocates a single string only when the lint triggers.
This also no longer lints on strings which don't start with an uppercase letter (e.g. `something_FOO`).
changelog: none
* Delay the parsing of the use node
* Mark when the `SyntaxContext` changes rather than return `None`
* Return a default value if the HIR tree is broken rather than `None`
Avoid emitting `assigning_clones` when cloned data borrows from the place to clone into
Fixes#12444Fixes#12460Fixes#12749Fixes#12757Fixes#12929
I think the documentation for the function should describe what- and how this is fixing the issues well.
It avoids emitting a warning when the data being cloned borrows from the place to clone into, which is information that we can get from `PossibleBorrowerMap`. Unfortunately, it is a tiny bit tedious to match on the MIR like that and I'm not sure if this is possibly relying a bit too much on the exact MIR lowering for assignments.
Things left to do:
- [x] Handle place projections (or verify that they work as expected)
- [x] Handle non-`Drop` types
changelog: [`assigning_clones`]: avoid warning when the suggestion would lead to a borrow-check error
Fix doc nits
Clippy is wonderful, and reading its lints is a great way to learn about Rust. While doing this, I noticed a few little copyedits, such as adding trailing periods to sentences, or tweaking wording very slightly to improve its readability. I hope you will accept these suggestions as an act of love for the project, with my thanks for all the maintainers' hard work.
changelog: Docs [ mut_range_bound ]: fix doc nits
changelog: Docs [ needless_for_each ]: fix doc nits
changelog: Docs [ arc_with_non_send_sync ]: fix doc nits
changelog: Docs [ allow_attributes ]: fix doc nits
changelog: Docs [ allow_attributes_without_reason ]: fix doc nits
Let `qualify_min_const_fn` deal with drop terminators
Fixes#12677
The `method_accepts_droppable` check that was there seemed overly conservative.
> Returns true if any of the method parameters is a type that implements `Drop`.
> The method can't be made const then, because `drop` can't be const-evaluated.
Accepting parameters that implement `Drop` should still be fine as long as the parameter isn't actually dropped, as is the case in the linked issue where the droppable is moved into the return place. This more accurate analysis ("is there a `drop` terminator") is already done by `qualify_min_const_fn` [here](f5e250180c/clippy_utils/src/qualify_min_const_fn.rs (L298)), so I don't think this additional check is really necessary?
Fixing the other, second case in the linked issue was only slightly more involved, since `Vec::new()` is a function call that has the ability to panic, so there must be a `drop()` terminator for cleanup, however we should be able to freely ignore that. [Const checking ignores cleanup blocks](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/check.rs#L382-L388), so we should, too?
r? `@Jarcho`
----
changelog: [`missing_const_for_fn`]: continue linting on fns with parameters implementing `Drop` if they're not actually dropped
Don't lint indexing_slicing lints on proc macros
This pr fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12824
Even though the issue mentions the indexing case only, it was easy to apply the fix to the slicing case as well.
changelog: [`out_of_bounds_indexing`, `indexing_slicing`]: Don't lint on procedural macros.
Handle single chars with `to_string()` for `single_char_add_str`
Add support for single chars / literals with `to_string()` call for `push_str()` and `insert_str()`.
changelog: [`single_char_add_str`]: handle single chars with `to_string()` call
Closes#12775
Normalize type aliases when checking significant drops.
fixes#10750
No test as I'm not sure exactly how the type alias caused a stack overflow here. Also removes an unnecessary `HashSet`.
changelog: none
- remove now dead code in ASSERTIONS_ON_CONSTANTS
cc #11966
- Partially revert "ignore `assertions-on-constants` in const contexts"
This reverts commit c7074de420a2192fb40d3f2194a20dd0d1b65cc6.
Don't lint blocks in closures for blocks_in_conditions
Seemed like an outlier for the lint which generally caught only the syntactically confusing cases, it lints blocks in closures but excludes closures passed to iterator methods, this changes it to ignore closures in general
changelog: none
Remove `lazy_static` mention
I planned to replace any mention with `LazyLock` but I think `thread_local` is more appropriate here - `const`s that aren't `Sync` wouldn't be able to go in a `lazy_static`/`static LazyLock` either
Also removed a test file that was mostly commented out so wasn't testing anything
changelog: none
Changelog for Clippy 1.79 🎓
Two cat ears from waffle,
A tail and a dress,
That's our Jyn,
The magnificent cat
~ =^.^=
---
### The cat of this release is: *Jyn* submitted by `@jyn514:`
<img height=600 src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/assets/17087237/2f902dea-9ad5-4ad2-b281-1f152b7ad7c7" alt="The cat(s) of this Clippy release" />
Cats for the next release can be nominated in the comments :D
---
changelog: none
Make `for_each_expr` visit closures by default, rename the old version `for_each_expr_without_closures`
A lot of the time `for_each_expr` is picked when closures should be visited so I think it makes sense for this to be the default with the alternative available for when you don't need to visit them.
The first commit renames `for_each_expr` to `for_each_expr_without_closures` and `for_each_expr_with_closures` to `for_each_expr`
The second commit switches a few uses that I caught over to include closures to fix a few bugs
changelog: none
This commit fixes a bug introduced in #12706, where the behavior of the
lint has been changed, to avoid suggestions that introduce a move. The
motivation in the commit message is quite poor (if the detection for
significant drops is not sufficient because it's not transitive, the
proper fix would be to make it transitive). However, #12454, the linked
issue, provides a good reason for the change — if the value being
borrowed is bound to a variable, then moving it will only introduce
friction into future refactorings.
Thus #12706 changes the logic so that the lint triggers if the value
being borrowed is Copy, or is the result of a function call, simplifying
the logic to the point where analysing "is this the only use of this
value" isn't necessary.
However, said PR also introduces an undocumented carveout, where
referents that themselves are mutable references are treated as Copy,
to catch some cases that we do want to lint against. However, that is
not sound — it's possible to consume a mutable reference by moving it.
To avoid emitting false suggestions, this PR reintroduces the
referent_used_exactly_once logic and runs that check for referents that
are themselves mutable references.
Thinking about the code shape of &mut x, where x: &mut T, raises the
point that while removing the &mut outright won't work, the extra
indirection is still undesirable, and perhaps instead we should suggest
reborrowing: &mut *x. That, however, is left as possible future work.
Fixes#12856
Fix grammer for the Safety documentation check
The original message ("unsafe function's docs miss `# Safety` section") reads quite awkwardly. I've changed it to "unsafe function's docs are missing a `# Safety` section" to have it read better.
```
changelog: [`missing_headers`]: Tweak the grammar in the lint message
```
[`overly_complex_bool_expr`]: Fix trigger wrongly on never type
fixes#12689
---
changelog: fix [`overly_complex_bool_expr`] triggers wrongly on never type
Dedup nonminimal_bool_methods diags
Relates to #12379
Fix `nonminimal_bool` lint so that it doesn't check the same span multiple times.
`NotSimplificationVisitor` was called for each expression from `NonminimalBoolVisitor` whereas `NotSimplificationVisitor` also recursively checked all expressions.
---
changelog: [`nonminimal_bool`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics
The original message ("unsafe function's docs miss `# Safety` section")
reads quite awkwardly. I've changed it to "unsafe function's docs are missing
a `# Safety` section" to have it read better.
Signed-off-by: Paul R. Tagliamonte <paultag@gmail.com>
Currently we have an awkward mix of fallible and infallible functions:
```
new_parser_from_source_str
maybe_new_parser_from_source_str
new_parser_from_file
(maybe_new_parser_from_file) // missing
(new_parser_from_source_file) // missing
maybe_new_parser_from_source_file
source_str_to_stream
maybe_source_file_to_stream
```
We could add the two missing functions, but instead this commit removes
of all the infallible ones and renames the fallible ones leaving us with
these which are all fallible:
```
new_parser_from_source_str
new_parser_from_file
new_parser_from_source_file
source_str_to_stream
source_file_to_stream
```
This requires making `unwrap_or_emit_fatal` public so callers of
formerly infallible functions can still work.
This does make some of the call sites slightly more verbose, but I think
it's worth it for the simpler API. Also, there are two `catch_unwind`
calls and one `catch_fatal_errors` call in this diff that become
removable thanks this change. (I will do that in a follow-up PR.)
Modify str_to_string to be machine-applicable
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12768
I'm not sure if there is any potential for edge cases with this - since it only ever acts on `&str` types I can't think of any, and especially since the methods do the same thing anyway.
changelog: allow `str_to_string` lint to be automatically applied
Uplift `{Closure,Coroutine,CoroutineClosure}Args` and friends to `rustc_type_ir`
Part of converting the new solver's `structural_traits.rs` to be interner-agnostic.
I decided against aliasing `ClosureArgs<TyCtxt<'tcx>>` to `ClosureArgs<'tcx>` because it seemed so rare. I could do so if desired, though.
r? lcnr
Disable `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11525
Disables `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls, specifically any implementations that also do not have a `get` method anywhere along the deref chain (so, for example, it still lints on Vec, which has its `get` method as part of the deref chain).
Thanks `@y21` for pointing me in the right direction with a couple of handy util functions for deref chain and inherent methods, saved a headache there!
changelog: FP: Disable `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls
Rename HIR `TypeBinding` to `AssocItemConstraint` and related cleanup
Rename `hir::TypeBinding` and `ast::AssocConstraint` to `AssocItemConstraint` and update all items and locals using the old terminology.
Motivation: The terminology *type binding* is extremely outdated. "Type bindings" not only include constraints on associated *types* but also on associated *constants* (feature `associated_const_equality`) and on RPITITs of associated *functions* (feature `return_type_notation`). Hence the word *item* in the new name. Furthermore, the word *binding* commonly refers to a mapping from a binder/identifier to a "value" for some definition of "value". Its use in "type binding" made sense when equality constraints (e.g., `AssocTy = Ty`) were the only kind of associated item constraint. Nowadays however, we also have *associated type bounds* (e.g., `AssocTy: Bound`) for which the term *binding* doesn't make sense.
---
Old terminology (HIR, rustdoc):
```
`TypeBinding`: (associated) type binding
├── `Constraint`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: (associated) equality constraint (?)
├── `Ty`: (associated) type binding
└── `Const`: associated const equality (constraint)
```
Old terminology (AST, abbrev.):
```
`AssocConstraint`
├── `Bound`
└── `Equality`
├── `Ty`
└── `Const`
```
New terminology (AST, HIR, rustdoc):
```
`AssocItemConstraint`: associated item constraint
├── `Bound`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: associated item equality constraint OR associated item binding (for short)
├── `Ty`: associated type equality constraint OR associated type binding (for short)
└── `Const`: associated const equality constraint OR associated const binding (for short)
```
r? compiler-errors
fix: let non_canonical_impls skip proc marco
Fixed#12788
Although the issue only mentions `NON_CANONICAL_CLONE_IMPL`, this fix will also affect `NON_CANONICAL_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL` because I saw
> Because of these unforeseeable or unstable behaviors, macro expansion should often not be regarded as a part of the stable API.
on Clippy Documentation and these two lints are similar, so I think it might be good, not sure if it's right or not.
---
changelog: `NON_CANONICAL_CLONE_IMPL`, `NON_CANONICAL_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL` will skip proc marco now
Make `body_owned_by` return the `Body` instead of just the `BodyId`
fixes#125677
Almost all `body_owned_by` callers immediately called `body`, too, so just return `Body` directly.
This makes the inline-const query feeding more robust, as all calls to `body_owned_by` will now yield a body for inline consts, too.
I have not yet figured out a good way to make `tcx.hir().body()` return an inline-const body, but that can be done as a follow-up
don't inhibit random field reordering on repr(packed(1))
`inhibit_struct_field_reordering_opt` being false means we exclude this type from random field shuffling. However, `packed(1)` types can still be shuffled! The logic was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48528 since it's pointless to reorder fields in packed(1) types (there's no padding that could be saved) -- but that shouldn't inhibit `-Zrandomize-layout` (which did not exist at the time).
We could add an optimization elsewhere to not bother sorting the fields for `repr(packed)` types, but I don't think that's worth the effort.
This *does* change the behavior in that we may now reorder fields of `packed(1)` structs (e.g. if there are niches, we'll try to move them to the start/end, according to `NicheBias`). We were always allowed to do that but so far we didn't. Quoting the [reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/type-layout.html):
> On their own, align and packed do not provide guarantees about the order of fields in the layout of a struct or the layout of an enum variant, although they may be combined with representations (such as C) which do provide such guarantees.
[`many_single_char_names`]: Deduplicate diagnostics
Relates to #12379
Fix `many_single_char_names` lint so that it doesn't emit diagnostics when the current level of the scope doesn't contain any single character name.
```rust
let (a, b, c, d): (i32, i32, i32, i32);
match 1 {
1 => (),
e => {},
}
```
produced the exact same MANY_SINGLE_CHAR_NAMES diagnostic at each of the Arm `e => {}` and the Block `{}`.
---
changelog: [`many_single_char_names`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics
Fix `unnecessary_to_owned` interaction with macro expansion
fixes#12821
In the case of an unnecessary `.iter().cloned()`, the lint `unnecessary_to_owned` might suggest to remove the `&` from references without checking if such references are inside a macro expansion. This can lead to unexpected behavior or even broken code if the lint suggestion is applied blindly. See issue #12821 for an example.
This PR checks if such references are inside macro expansions and skips this part of the lint suggestion in these cases.
changelog: [`unnecessary_to_owned`]: Don't suggest to remove `&` inside macro expansion
`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`: Trigger lint only if lifetime allows early significant drop
I want to argue that the following code snippet should not trigger `significant_drop_in_scrutinee` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8987). The iterator holds a reference to the locked data, so it is expected that the mutex guard must be alive until the entire loop is finished.
```rust
use std::sync::Mutex;
fn main() {
let mutex_vec = Mutex::new(vec![1, 2, 3]);
for number in mutex_vec.lock().unwrap().iter() {
dbg!(number);
}
}
```
However, the lint should be triggered when we clone the vector. In this case, the iterator does not hold any reference to the locked data.
```diff
- for number in mutex_vec.lock().unwrap().iter() {
+ for number in mutex_vec.lock().unwrap().clone().iter() {
```
Unfortunately, it seems that regions on the types of local variables are mostly erased (`ReErased`) in the late lint pass. So it is hard to tell if the final expression has a lifetime relevant to the value with a significant drop.
In this PR, I try to make a best-effort guess based on the function signatures. To avoid false positives, no lint is issued if the result is uncertain. I'm not sure if this is acceptable or not, so any comments are welcome.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8987
changelog: [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]: Trigger lint only if lifetime allows early significant drop.
r? `@flip1995`
fulfill expectations in `check_partial_eq_without_eq`
This is a followup to #12804, fixing a similar issue for `derive_partial_eq_without_eq` by using `span_lint_hir_and_then` instead of `span_lint_and_sugg`.
Additionally tests for both `#[allow(clippy::derive_partial_eq_without_eq)]` and `#[expect(clippy::derive_partial_eq_without_eq)]` are added.
changelog:[`derive_partial_eq_without_eq`]: fulfill expectations
The `restriction` group contains many lints which are not about
necessarily “bad” things, but style choices — perhaps even style choices
which contradict conventional Rust style — or are otherwise very
situational. This results in silly wording like “Why is this bad?
It isn't, but ...”, which I’ve seen confuse a newcomer at least once.
To improve this situation, this commit replaces the “Why is this bad?”
section heading with “Why restrict this?”, for most, but not all,
restriction lints. I left alone the ones whose placement in the
restriction group is more incidental.
In order to make this make sense, I had to remove the “It isn't, but”
texts from the contents of the sections. Sometimes further changes
were needed, or there were obvious fixes to make, and I went ahead
and made those changes without attempting to split them into another
commit, even though many of them are not strictly necessary for the
“Why restrict this?” project.
* Remove incorrect claim that “wrappers around it are the conventional
way to define an uninhabited type”.
* Discuss why one would use `!`, a newtype struct, or keep the enum.
* Add links to relevant documentation.
fulfill expectations in `check_unsafe_derive_deserialize`
The utility function `clippy_utils::fulfill_or_allowed` is not used because using it would require to move the check for allowed after the check iterating over all inherent impls of the type, doing possibly unnecessary work.
Instead, `is_lint_allowed` is called as before, but additionally, once certain that the lint should be emitted, `span_lint_hir_and_then` is called instead of `span_lint_and_help` to also fulfill expectations.
Note: as this is my first contribution, please feel free to nitpick or request changes. I am happy to adjust the implementation.
fixes: #12802
changelog: fulfill expectations in [`unsafe_derive_deserialize`]
Add new lint `while_float`
This PR adds a nursery lint that checks for while loops comparing floating point values.
changelog:
```
changelog: [`while_float`]: Checks for while loops comparing floating point values.
```
Fixes#758
chore: Remove repeated words (extension of #124924)
When I saw #124924 I thought "Hey, I'm sure that there are far more than just two typos of this nature in the codebase". So here's some more typo-fixing.
Some found with regex, some found with a spellchecker. Every single one manually reviewed by me (along with hundreds of false negatives by the tools)
This avoids event spans that would otherwise cause crashes, since an
End's span covers the range of the tag (which will be earlier than the
line break within the tag).
Rename Unsafe to Safety
Alternative to #124455, which is to just have one Safety enum to use everywhere, this opens the posibility of adding `ast::Safety::Safe` that's useful for unsafe extern blocks.
This leaves us today with:
```rust
enum ast::Safety {
Unsafe(Span),
Default,
// Safe (going to be added for unsafe extern blocks)
}
enum hir::Safety {
Unsafe,
Safe,
}
```
We would convert from `ast::Safety::Default` into the right Safety level according the context.
Add configuration option for ignoring `panic!()` in tests
```
changelog: [`panic`]: Now can be disabled in tests with the `allow-panic-in-tests` option
```
I often find myself using `panic!(…)` in tests a lot, where I often do something like:
```rust
match enam {
Enam::A => …,
Enam::B => …,
_ => panic!("This should not happen at all."),
}
```
I think this patch should go nicely with already existing `allow-unwrap-in-tests` and `allow-expect-in-tests`.
The utility function `clippy_utils::fulfill_or_allowed` is not used because
using it would require to move the check for allowed after the check
iterating over all inherent impls of the type, doing possibly
unnecessary work.
Instead, `is_lint_allowed` is called as before, but additionally, once
certain that the lint should be emitted, `span_lint_hir_and_then` is called
instead of `span_lint_and_help` to also fulfill expectations.
fixes: #12802
changelog: fulfill expectations in `check_unsafe_derive_deserialize`
less aggressive needless_borrows_for_generic_args
Current implementation looks for significant drops, that can change the behavior, but that's not enough - value might not have a `Drop` itself but one of its children might have it.
A good example is passing a reference to `PathBuf` to `std::fs::File::open`. There's no benefits to pass `PathBuf` by value, but since `clippy` can't see `Drop` on `Vec` several layers down it complains forcing pass by value and making it impossible to use the same name later.
New implementation only looks at copy values or values created in place so existing variable will never be moved but things that take a string reference created and value is created inplace `&"".to_owned()` will make it to suggest to use `"".to_owned()` still.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12454
changelog: [`needless_borrows_for_generic_args`]: avoid moving variables
`assigning_clones`: move to `pedantic` so it is allow by default
In a nutshell, the `assigning_clones` lint suggests to make your code less readable for a small performance gain. See #12778 for more motivation.
fixes#12778
changelog: [`assigning_clones`]: move to the `pedantic` group
improve [`match_same_arms`] messages, enable rustfix test
closes: #9251
don't worry about the commit size, most of them are generated
---
changelog: improve [`match_same_arms`] lint messages
`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`: Fix false positives due to false drops of place expressions
Place expressions do not really create temporaries, so they will not create significant drops. For example, the following code snippet is quite good (#8963):
```rust
fn main() {
let x = std::sync::Mutex::new(vec![1, 2, 3]);
let x_guard = x.lock().unwrap();
match x_guard[0] {
1 => println!("1!"),
x => println!("{x}"),
}
drop(x_guard); // Some "usage"
}
```
Also, the previous logic thinks that references like `&MutexGuard<_>`/`Ref<'_, MutexGuard<'_, _>>` have significant drops, which is simply not true, so it is fixed together in this PR.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8963
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9072
changelog: [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]: Fix false positives due to false drops of place expressions.
r? `@blyxyas`
add new lint that disallow renaming parameters in trait functions
fixes: #11443fixes: #486
changelog: add new lint [`renamed_function_params`]
Note that the lint name is not final, because I have a bad reputation in naming things, and I don't trust myself.
Lint direct priority conflicts in `[workspace.lints]`
Partially addresses #12729
This still doesn't do any workspace resolution stuff, so it will not catch any virtual workspaces or conflicts from inherited definitions. But while we're parsing the `Cargo.toml` we might as well check the workspace definitions if we find them
changelog: none
Handle `rustc_on_unimplemented` in duplicated_attributes
```rust
#[rustc_on_unimplemented(
on(
_Self = "&str",
label = "`a"
),
on(
_Self = "alloc::string::String",
label = "a"
),
)]
```
The lint treats this as a repetition because `rustc_on_unimplemented:🔛:label` appears twice, but that's ok.
Fixes#12619
changelog: [`duplicated_attributes`]: fix handling of `rustc_on_unimplemented`
Add new lint `doc_lazy_continuation`
changelog: [`doc_lazy_continuation`]: add lint that warns on so-called "lazy paragraph continuations"
This is a follow-up for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121659, since most cases of unintended block quotes are lazy continuations. The lint is designed to be more generally useful than that, though, because it will also catch unintended list items and unintended block quotes that didn't coincidentally hit a pulldown-cmark bug.
The second commit is the result of running `cargo dev dogfood --fix`, and manually fixing anything that seems wrong. NOTE: this lint's suggestions should never change the parser's interpretation of the markdown, but in many cases, it seems that doc comments in clippy were written without regard for this feature of Markdown (which, I suppose, is why this lint should exist).
Ignore `_to_string` lints in code `from_expansion`
Includes the `string_to_string` and `str_to_string` lints.
changelog: [`str_to_string`]: Ignore code from expansion
changelog: [`string_to_string`]: Ignore code from expansion
fix: use hir_with_context to produce correct snippets for assigning_clones
The `assigning_clones` lint is producing wrong output when the assignment is a macro call.
Since Applicability level `Unspecified` will never be changed inside `hir_with_applicability`, so it is safe here to replace `hir_with_applicability` with `hir_with_context` to generate snippets of the macro call instead of the expansion.
fixes#12776
changelog: [`assigning_clones`]: use `hir_with_context` to produce correct snippets
fix false positive in Issue/12098 because lack of consideration of mutable caller
fixes [Issue#12098](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12098)
In issue#12098, the former code doesn't consider the caller for clone is mutable, and suggests to delete clone function.
In this change, we first get the inner caller requests for clone,
and if it's immutable, the following code will suggest deleting clone.
If it's mutable, the loop will check whether a borrow check violation exists,
if exists, the lint should not execute, and the function will directly return;
otherwise, the following code will handle this.
changelog: [`clippy::unnecessary_to_owned`]: fix false positive
Simplify `use crate::rustc_foo::bar` occurrences.
They can just be written as `use rustc_foo::bar`, which is far more standard. (I didn't even know that a `crate::` prefix was valid.)
r? ``@eholk``
Remove braces when fixing a nested use tree into a single item
[Back in 2019](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56645) I added rustfix support for the `unused_imports` lint, to automatically remove them when running `cargo fix`. For the most part this worked great, but when removing all but one childs of a nested use tree it turned `use foo::{Unused, Used}` into `use foo::{Used}`. This is slightly annoying, because it then requires you to run `rustfmt` to get `use foo::Used`.
This PR automatically removes braces and the surrouding whitespace when all but one child of a nested use tree are unused. To get it done I had to add the span of the nested use tree to the AST, and refactor a bit the code I wrote back then.
A thing I noticed is, there doesn't seem to be any `//@ run-rustfix` test for fixing the `unused_imports` lint. I created a test in `tests/suggestions` (is that the right directory?) that for now tests just what I added in the PR. I can followup in a separate PR to add more tests for fixing `unused_lints`.
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
This is a follow-up for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121659,
since most cases of unintended block quotes are lazy continuations.
The lint is designed to be more generally useful than that, though,
because it will also catch unintended list items and unintended
block quotes that didn't coincidentally hit a pulldown-cmark bug.
Allow more attributes in `clippy::useless_attribute`
Fixes#12753Fixes#4467Fixes#11595Fixes#10878
changelog: [`useless_attribute`]: Attributes allowed on `use` items now include `ambiguous_glob_exports`, `hidden_glob_reexports`, `dead_code`, `unused_braces`, and `clippy::disallowed_types`.
Current implementation looks for significant drops, that can change the
behavior, but that's not enough - value might not have a Drop itself but
one of its children might have it.
A good example is passing a reference to `PathBuf` to `std::fs::File::open`.
There's no benefits to pass `PathBuf` by value, but since clippy can't
see `Drop` on `Vec` several layers down it complains forcing pass by
value and making it impossible to use the same name later.
New implementation only looks at copy values or values created inplace
so existing variable will never be moved but things that take a string
reference created and value is created inplace `&"".to_owned()` will
make it to suggest to use `"".to_owned()` still.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12454
Fix `FormatArgs` storage when `-Zthreads` > 1
Fixes#11886
The initial way I thought of was a little gross so I never opened a PR for it, I thought of a nicer way today that no longer involves any `thread_local`s or `static`s
`rustc_data_strucutres::sync::{Lrc, OnceLock}` implement `DynSend` + `DynSync` so we can pass them to the lint passes that need the storage
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995`
Suggest collapsing nested or patterns if the MSRV allows it
Nested `or` patterns have been stable since 1.53, so we should be able to suggest `Some(1 | 2)` if the MSRV isn't set below that.
This change adds an msrv check and also moves it to `matches/mod.rs`, because it's also needed by `redundant_guards`.
changelog: [`collapsible_match`]: suggest collapsing nested or patterns if the MSRV allows it