Ensure new_ret_no_self is not fired if impl Trait<Self> is returned.
Fix#7344: ensure new_ret_no_self is not fired if `impl Trait<Self>` is returned.
changelog: [`new_ret_no_self`]: No longer lints when `impl Trait<Self>` is returned
[`use_self`] fix suggestion when full path to struct was given
Previously the following wrong suggestion was given
```rust
impl Error for std::fmt::Error {
fn custom<T: std::fmt::Display>(_msg: T) -> Self {
- std::fmt::Error // Should lint
+ Self::Error // Should lint
}
}
```
Also remove known problem line related to #4140 since it's been closed, and refactor the lint
changelog: [`use_self`] fix suggestion when full path to struct was given
`question_mark` don't lint on `if let Err` with `else`
cc #9518
AFAICT the only time this would be a valid suggestion is the rather esoteric
```rust
let _ = if let Err(e) = x {
return Err(e);
} else {
// no side effects
x.unwrap()
}
```
which doesn't seem worth checking to me. Please correct me if I'm missing something.
changelog: [`question_mark`] don't lint on `if let Err` with `else`
move `UNINLINED_FORMAT_ARGS` to pedantic
As discussed in zulip, we are moving this lint to pedantic to be backported
changelog: [`UNINLINED_FORMAT_ARGS`]: move to pedantic
Fix `needless_borrow` false positive
The PR fixes the false positive exposed by `@BusyJay's` example in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9111#issuecomment-1277114280
The current approach is described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9674#issuecomment-1289294201 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9674#issuecomment-1292225232.
The original approach appears below.
---
The proposed fix is to flag only "simple" trait implementations involving references, a concept
that I introduce next.
Intuitively, a trait implementation is "simple" if all it does is dereference and apply the trait
implementation of a type named by a type parameter. `AsRef` provides a good example of a simple
implementation: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.AsRef.html#impl-AsRef%3CU%3E-for-%26T
We can make this idea more precise as follows. Given a trait implementation, first determine
whether the implementation is "used defined." If so, then examine its nested obligations.
Consider the implementation simple if-and-only-if:
- there is at least one nested obligation for the same trait
- for each type `X` in the nested obligation's substitution, either `X` is the same as that of
the original obligation's substitution, or the original type is `&X`
For example, the following implementation from `@BusyJay's` example is "complex" (i.e., not simple)
because it produces no nested obligations:
```rust
impl<'a> Extend<&'a u8> for A { ... }
```
On the other hand, the following slightly modified implementation is simple, because it produces
a nested obligation for `Extend<X>`:
```rust
impl<'a, X> Extend<&'a X> for A where A: Extend<X> { ... }
```
How does flagging only simple implementations help? One way of interpreting the false positive in
`@BusyJay's` example is that it separates a reference from a concrete type. Doing so turns a
successful type inference into a failing one. By flagging only simple implementations, we
separate references from type variables only, thereby eliminating this class of false positives.
Note that `Deref` is a special case, as the obligations generated for it already involve the
underlying type.
r? `@Jarcho` (Sorry to keep pinging you with `needless_borrow` stuff. But my impression is no one knows this code better than you.)
changelog: fix `needless_borrow` false positive
Previously the following wrong suggestion was given
```rust
impl Error for std::fmt::Error {
fn custom<T: std::fmt::Display>(_msg: T) -> Self {
- std::fmt::Error // Should lint
+ Self::Error // Should lint
}
}
```
Also remove known problem line related to #4140 since it's been closed, and refactor the lint
Remove `lib.register_*` and `src/docs*` in `cargo dev update_lints`
Follow up to #9709 / #9541
There's a good number of PRs with some leftover `src/docs` files for example, and as a reviewer it's something we're used to ignoring so it can easily slip through
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
Track `clippy.toml` and `Cargo.toml` in `file_depinfo`
Causes cargo to re-run clippy when those paths are modified
Also tracks the path to `clippy-driver` in debug mode to remove the workarounds in `cargo dev lint` and `lintcheck` (cc `@matthiaskrgr)`
changelog: Automatically re-run Clippy if `Cargo.toml` or `clippy.toml` are modified
Fixes#2130Fixes#8512
r? `@flip1995`
Causes cargo to re-run clippy when those paths are modified
Also tracks the path to `clippy-driver` in debug mode to remove the
workarounds in `cargo dev lint` and `lintcheck`
make ignored internally mutable types for `mutable-key` configurable
We had some false positives where people would create their own types that had interior mutability unrelated to hash/eq. This addition lets you configure this as e.g. `arc-like-types=["bytes::Bytes"]`
This fixes#5325 by allowing users to specify the types whose innards like `Arc` should be ignored (the generic types are still checked) for the sake of detecting inner mutability.
r? `@Alexendoo`
---
changelog: Allow configuring types to ignore internal mutability in `mutable-key`
Update `from_raw_with_void_ptr` to support types other than `Box`
This PR updates the `from_raw_with_void_ptr` lint, which covered
`Box::from_raw`, to also cover the `from_raw` static method of the
`Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
It also improves the description and error messages of this lint.
---
changelog: [`from_raw_with_void_ptr`]: Now works with the `Rc`, `Arc`, `alloc::rc::Weak` and `alloc::sync::Weak` types.
add new lint `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind `
changelog: `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind`: new lint to suggest using `rewind` instead of `seek` to start
Resolve#8600
We had some false positives where people would create their own types
that had interior mutability unrelated to hash/eq. This addition lets
you configure this as e.g. `arc-like-types=["bytes::Bytes"]`
Add lint to tell about let else pattern
Adds a lint to tell the user if the let_else pattern should be used.
~~The PR is blocked probably on rustfmt support, as clippy shouldn't suggest features that aren't yet fully supported by all tools.~~ Edit: I guess adding it as a restriction lint for now is the best option, it can be turned into a style lint later.
---
changelog: addition of a new lint to check for manual `let else`
Sometimes type annotations are needed for type inferrence to work,
or because of coercions. We don't know this, and we also don't
want users to possibly repeat the entire pattern.
