If the type of the result of a call to `IntoIterator::into_iter()`
and the type of the receiver are the same, then the receiver
implements `Iterator` and `into_iter()` is the identity function.
The call to `into_iter()` may be removed in all but two cases:
- If the receiver implements `Copy`, `into_iter()` will produce
a copy of the receiver and cannot be removed. For example,
`x.into_iter().next()` will not advance `x` while `x.next()` will.
- If the receiver is an immutable local variable and the call to
`into_iter()` appears in a larger expression, removing the call to
`into_iter()` might cause mutability issues. For example, if `x`
is an immutable local variable, `x.into_iter().next()` will
compile while `x.next()` will not as `next()` receives
`&mut self`.
Rustup
r? `@ghost`
I'm on the train and my internet is too bad to download the necessary toolchain, so I have to use CI to find sync fallout.
changelog: none
<!-- changelog_checked -->
fix: not suggest seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind when expr is used
changelog: [`seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind`]: No longer lints, if the return of `seek` is used.
[#10096](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10096)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Fixes#10065
There used to be a logical bug where IncrementVisitor would
completely stop checking an expression/block after seeing a continue
statement. This led to issue #10058 where a variable incremented
(or otherwise modified) after any continue statement would still be
considered incremented only once.
The solution is to continue scanning the expression after seeing a
`continue` statement, but increment self.depth so that the Visitor
thinks that the rest of the loop is within a conditional.
improve `manual_is_ascii_check ` check
Sorry, not familiar the api, i can only check the method name of expression `<expr-1>.contains(<expr-2>)` after read clippy book and hints from #9933 . i dont know how to check
1. if <expr-1> is a specific range
2. <expr-2> is a character
r? `@xFrednet` could you please provide some more hints? 😝️
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`manual_is_ascii_check`]: Now detects ranges with `.contains()` calls
[#10053](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10053)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add 1.58 MSRV for `collapsible_str_replace`
The `Pattern` impl for `[char; N]` was added in 1.58
changelog: Enhancement: [`collapsible_str_replace`]: Now takes MSRV into consideration. The minimal version is 1.58
[#10047](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10047)
add `suppress_restriction_lint_in_const` config
According to #9808 , add a new lint `suppress_lint_in_const` to report even in const context. BTW, i am not good at naming either, if anyone have a better idea, i am happy to change it.
This PR is still in progress, so i keep it draft.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
changelog: Enhancement: [`indexing_slicing`]: add new config `suppress-restriction-lint-in-const` to enable restriction lints, even if the suggestion might not be applicable
r? `@xFrendet`
Fix 10021
This PR proposes a fix for #10021.
The problem is similar to the one that `@mikerite` described in #9505. The compiler is generating an empty substitution for a call, even though the type of `Self` seems to be needed for a predicate. In `@mikerite's` case, the call was to [`IntoFuture::into_future`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/future/trait.IntoFuture.html#tymethod.into_future). In this case, the call is to [`Try::branch`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/trait.Try.html#tymethod.branch).
The proposed fix is to verify that the parameter whose type is changing has an index within the substitution. The strikes me as a reasonable approach, since if the check were to fail, the following code would be a no-op:
4c123a06ba/clippy_lints/src/methods/unnecessary_to_owned.rs (L420-L428)
Like `@mikerite's` original solution, this solution turns ICEs into false negatives.
changelog: fix `unnecessary_to_owned` false positive involving `Try::branch`
Don't lint `implicit_clone` when the type doesn't implement clone
fixes#10019
changelog: `implicit_clone`: Don't lint when the type doesn't implement clone
Fix#9958
This PR fixes#9958. In order to fix the issue, the lint will now peel reference operators and enclose the expression with parentheses when necessary.
changelog: [`comparison_to_empty`]: Peel deref operators in suggestions when necessary
Don't lint `from_over_into` for opaque types
fixes#9935
This is stalled until the next sync. The impl in question can't be written on the pinned nightly.
changelog: Don't lint `from_over_into` for opaque types
rustc_ast_lowering: Stop lowering imports into multiple items
Lower them into a single item with multiple resolutions instead.
This also allows to remove additional `NodId`s and `DefId`s related to those additional items.
Treat custom enum discriminant values as constants
fixes#9882
changelog: All lints: Don't lint in enum discriminant values when the suggestion won't work in a const context
Lower them into a single item with multiple resolutions instead.
This also allows to remove additional `NodId`s and `DefId`s related to those additional items.
Don't lint `explicit_auto_deref` when the initial type is neither a reference, nor a receiver
fixes#9901fixes#9777
changelog: `explicit_auto_deref`: Don't lint when the initial value is neither a reference, nor a receiver
Don't cross contexts while building the suggestion for `redundant_closure_call`
fixes#9957
changelog: `redundant_closure_call`: Don't cross macro contexts while building the suggestion
Move `unnecessary_unsafety_doc` to `pedantic`
This lint was added in #9822. I like the idea, but also agree with #9986 as well. I think it should at least not be warn-by-default. This is one of these cases, where I'd like a group between pedantic and restriction. But I believe that users using `#![warn(clippy::pedantic)]` will know how to enable the lint if they disagree with it.
---
Since the lint is new:
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995` since I'd suggest back porting this, the original PR was merged 16 days ago.
Closes: #9986 (While it doesn't address everything, I believe that this is the best compromise)
Add allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args config
Implement `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to change the behavior of the `uninlined_format_args` lint. Now it is a part of `style` per [Zulip chat](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/.60uninlined_format_args.60.20category), and won't propose inlining in case of a mixed usage, e.g. `print!("{} {}", var, 1+2)`. If the user sets `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to `false`, the lint would behave like it did before -- proposing to inline args even in the mixed case.
---
changelog: [`uninlined_format_args`]: Added a new config `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` to allow the lint, if only some arguments can be inlined
[#9865](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9865)
changelog: Moved [`uninlined_format_args`] to `style` (Now warn-by-default)
[#9865](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9865)
Implement `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to change the behavior of the `uninlined_format_args` lint. Now it is a part of `style`, and won't propose inlining in case of a mixed usage, e.g. `print!("{} {}", var, 1+2)`. If the user sets allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args config param to `false`, then it would behave like before, proposing to inline args even in the mixed case.
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
Add `clippy_utils::msrv::Msrv` to keep track of the current MSRV
changelog: Fix the scoping of the `#![clippy::msrv]` attribute
Fixes#6920
r? `@Jarcho`
Fix [`unnecessary_lazy_eval`] when type has significant drop
fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9427#issuecomment-1295742590
However current implementation gives too many false positive, rending the lint almost useless.
I don't know what's the best way to check if a type has a "significant" drop (in the common meaning, not the internal rustc one, for example Option<(u8, u8)> should not be considered significant)
changelog: Fix [`unnecessary_lazy_eval`] when type has significant drop
Fix#9771 (`unnecessary_to_owned` false positive)
Fixes#9771
In that issue's example(s), the lint tried to add a `&` to a value, which implicitly changed the type of a field to a reference. The fix is to add the reference to `receiver_ty` (the type of the receiver of the `to_owned`-like method), before passing `receiver_ty` to `can_change_type`. `can_change_type` properly rejects the modified `receiver_ty`.
cc: `@mikerite` just because I think he was the author of `can_change_type`.
changelog: fix `unnecessary_to_owned` false positive which implicitly tried to change the type of a field to a reference
Fix `redundant_closure_for_method_calls` suggestion
Fixes#7746. The issue turns out to be more general than raw pointers. The `redundant_closure_for_method_calls` lint produces incorrect suggestions when the method is associated with a type that must be enclosed in angle brackets or must be written with generic arguments substituted. For example:
```rust
fn main() {
// Clippy's suggestion: [T; N]::as_slice
// Correct suggestion: <[u8; 3]>::as_slice
let array_opt: Option<&[u8; 3]> = Some(&[4, 8, 7]);
array_opt.map(|a| a.as_slice());
// Clippy's suggestion: [T]::len
// Correct suggestion: <[u8]>::len
let slice_opt: Option<&[u8]> = Some(b"slice");
slice_opt.map(|s| s.len());
// Clippy's suggestion: *const T::is_null
// Correct suggestion: <*const usize>::is_null
let ptr_opt: Option<*const usize> = Some(&487);
ptr_opt.map(|p| p.is_null());
// Clippy's suggestion: dyn TestTrait::method_on_dyn
// Correct suggestion: <dyn TestTrait>::method_on_dyn
let test_struct = TestStruct {};
let dyn_opt: Option<&dyn TestTrait> = Some(&test_struct);
dyn_opt.map(|d| d.method_on_dyn());
}
// For the trait object example:
trait TestTrait {}
struct TestStruct {}
impl TestTrait for TestStruct {}
impl dyn TestTrait + '_ {
fn method_on_dyn(&self) -> bool {
false
}
}
```
The issue also affects references and tuples, though I had to patch the standard library with non-trait methods for those types to test that. Just in case, I also included handling for `!`, since it appeared to be possible to call methods on it with angle brackets. I just couldn't verify the resulting suggestion, since dead-code analysis eliminates the code first.
This is my first exposure to Rust compiler internals, so please let me know if I'm taking the wrong approach here!
changelog: [`redundant_closure_for_method_calls`]: add angle brackets and substitute generic arguments in suggestion when needed
Add new lint [`misnamed-getters`]
```
changelog: Add new lint [`misnamed-getters`]
```
Closes#9769
The current lint matches all methods with a body of just one expression under the form `(&mut?)? <expr>.field` where field doesn't match the name of the method but there is a field of the same type in `<expr>` that matches the name. This allows matching nested structs, for example for newtype wrappers. This may cast the net a bit too wide and cause false positives. I'll run [clippy_lint_tester](https://github.com/mikerite/clippy_lint_tester) on the top crates to see how frequently false positives happen.
There also may be room for improvement by checking that the replacement field would work taking into account implementations of `Deref` and `DerefMut` even if the types don't exactly match but I don't know yet how this could be done.
[arithmetic-side-effects] Detect overflowing associated constants of integers
Triggers the negation of maximum unsigned integers using associated constants. Rustc already handles `-128i8` but doesn't handle `-i8::MAX`.
At the same time, allows stuff like `-1234`.
changelog: FP: [arithmetic-side-effects] Detect overflowing associated constants of integers
Keep original literal notation in suggestion
While I did some investigation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9866 (I couldn't reproduce it though) I found that `unused_rounding` formats as follows:
```rust
3.0_f64.round() // => 3.0f64
```
This PR makes them preserve as the original notation.
```rust
3.0_f64.round() // => 3.0_f64
```
changelog: Suggestion Enhancement: [`unused_rounding`]: The suggestion now preserves the original float literal notation
Extend `needless_borrowed_reference` to structs and tuples, ignore _
changelog: [`needless_borrowed_reference`]: Lint struct and tuple patterns, and patterns containing `_`
Now lints patterns like
```rust
&(ref a, ref b)
&Tuple(ref a, ref b)
&Struct { ref a, ref b }
&(ref a, _)
```
Fix typo in `expect_used` and `unwrap_used` warning messages
"\`an Option\`" -> "an \`Option\`" and "\`a Result\`" -> "a \`Result\`".
changelog: fix typo in `expect_used` and `unwrap_used` warning messages
`never_loop`: don't emit AlwaysBreaks if it targets a block
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9837#issuecomment-1312788194
The previous fix (#9837) was too simple and ignored all break commands inside a labelled block, regardless of whether their destination was a labelled block or a loop. This fix tracks all the labelled blocks in scope to ensure that only breaks targeting loops are considered.
changelog: [`never_loop`]: prevent false negatives from `breaks` nested in labelled blocks
Introduced an ignored_ids parameter.
Takes O(n^2) time in the worst case.
Can be changed to collect block ids in first phase,
and then filter with binary search in second.
feat: lint unchecked subtraction of a 'Duration' from an 'Instant'
Hello all, I tried to tackle the open issue #9371 and this is what I came up with.
I have a difficulty currently - some tests are failing:
```
failures:
[ui] ui/manual_instant_elapsed.rs
```
The `manual_instant_elapsed` is failing because of `Instant::now() - duration` test, this now gets also picked by `unchecked_duration_subtraction` lint.
What is the correct way to proceed in this case? Simply update the `.stderr` file for `manual_instant_elapsed` lint?
changelog: [`unchecked_duration_subtraction`]: Add lint for unchecked subtraction of a `Duration` from an `Instant`.
fixes#9371
Make it clear that `or_fun_call` can be a false-positive
Also move it to nursery so that the false-positives can be dealt with.
CC #8574
changelog: [`or_fun_call`]: Mention false-positives, move to nursery.
Add `unnecessary_safety_doc` lint
changelog: [`unnecessary_safety_doc`]: Add `unnecessary_safety_doc` lint
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6880
This lint does not trigger for private functions, just like `missing_safety_docs`. Reason for that was implementation simplicity and because I figured asking first would make more sense, so if it should trigger for private functions as well let me know and I'll fix that up as well.
[`fn_params_excessive_bools`] Make it possible to allow the lint at the method level
changelog: FP: [`fn_params_excessive_bools`]: `#[allow]` now works on methods
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9687
Tested without committing but `#[allow]`ing now works. Also rewrote the lint to be a late lint while at it :)
r? `@xFrednet`
Fix `explicit_auto_deref` fp
fixes#9763fixes#9811
changelog: `explicit_auto_deref`: Don't lint when the target type is a projection with generic arguments
Address issues 9739 and 9782
This PR fixes#9739 in the manner I suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9739#issuecomment-1296802376.
This PR also fixes the compilation failures in #9782 (but doesn't address `@e00E's` other objections).
Fixes#9739
r? `@Jarcho`
changelog: Fix two `needless_borrow` false positives, one involving borrows in `if`-`else`s, the other involving qualified function calls
Add `manual_is_ascii_check` lint
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9290
This PR adds new lint `manual_is_ascii_check`, which detects comparison with ascii ranges using `matches!` macros.
As I mentioned as following in the Issue;
> Yes, that's true. we'll start small and then grow it.
> So I'll try to handle matches! macro with single range as suggested above.
However during writing first version, I was thinking that the changes to support alphabetic and digits will be small patch, so I made a single PR in hope review cost can be reduced.
changelog: add new lint [`manual_is_ascii_check`]
r? `@xFrednet`
