handle exponent without digits in `numeric_literal`
Fixes#10912
The numeric literal util module didn't check for exponents with no digits.
So:
384cf37612/clippy_utils/src/numeric_literal.rs (L163-L168)
`exponent` here would be the empty string, which passed the `!= "0"` check (when it shouldn't have, it should probably be treated as if the user wrote `E0`), then later fails when counting the digits and subtracting one (0 - 1 = overflow).
Also, interestingly I can't even write a test for this because exponents with no digits is some kind of error by itself and `cargo dev fmt` fails on it.
changelog: [`unreadable_literal`]: don't (debug) ICE on numeric literal with empty exponent
Direct towards late passes in `cargo dev new_lint`
changelog: none
This would be the tooling part of #9311
- `--pass late` is now the default
- It prints a message recommending the use of a late pass if you choose `--pass early`
Fix `diverging_sub_expression` not checking body of block
Fixes#10776
This also adds a warning to the test `ui/never_loop.rs`, not sure if this is correct or not.
changelog: [`diverging_sub_expression`]: Fix false negatives with body of block
[`unnecessary_to_owned`]: check that the adjusted type matches target
Fixes#10033.
Before this change, the lint would assume that removing the `.to_string()` in `f(&x.to_string())` would be ok if x is of some type that implements `Deref<Target = str>` and `f` takes a `&str`.
This turns out to not actually be ok if the `to_string` call is some method that exists on `x` directly, which happens if it implements `Display`/`ToString` itself.
changelog: [`unnecessary_to_owned`]: only lint if the adjusted receiver type actually matches
Ignore more pointer types in `unnecessary_cast`
Spotted this because
e2c655b4c0/tests/ui/suspicious_to_owned.rs (L9-L10)
currently fails on `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` as `c_char` is `u8` there
The current implementation checks for `as alias`, `as _`. This adds things like
- `as *const alias`
- `as *const cfg_dependant`
- `as *const _`
changelog: none
[`redundant_closure`]: special case inclusive ranges
Fixes#10684.
`x..=y` ranges need a bit of special handling in this lint because it desugars to a call to the lang item `RangeInclusiveNew`, where the callee span would be the same as the range expression itself, so the suggestion looked a bit weird. It now correctly suggests `RangeInclusive::new`.
changelog: [`redundant_closure`]: special case `RangeInclusive`
Adds new lint `arc_with_non_send_or_sync`
Fixes#653
Adds a new lint to check for uses of non-Send/Sync types within Arc.
```
changelog: [`arc_with_non_send_sync`]: Added a lint to detect uses of non-Send/Sync types within Arc.
```
[`useless_vec`]: lint `vec!` invocations when a slice or an array would do
First off, sorry for that large diff in tests. *A lot* of tests seem to trigger the lint with this new change, so I decided to `#![allow()]` the lint in the affected tests to make reviewing this easier, and also split the commits up so that the first commit is the actual logic of the lint and the second commit contains all the test changes. The stuff that changed in the tests is mostly just line numbers now. So, as large as the diff looks, it's not actually that bad. 😅
I manually went through all of these to find out about edge cases and decided to put them in `tests/ui/vec.rs`.
For more context, I wrote about the idea of this PR here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2262#issuecomment-1579155257 (that explains the logic)
Basically, it now also considers the case where a `Vec` is put in a local variable and the user only ever does things with it that one could also do with a slice or an array. This should catch a lot more cases, and (at least from looking at the tests) it does.
changelog: [`useless_vec`]: lint `vec!` invocations when a slice or an array would do (also considering local variables now)
`suspicious_else_formatting`: Don't warn if there is a comment between else and curly bracket
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10273
The idea is that if the only thing after `else` and before `{` is a comment, we will not warn because, probably, the line break was "made" by rustfmt.
changelog: [`suspicious_else_formatting`]: Don't warn if the only thing between `else` and curly bracket is a comment
