Specifically, this revises the clippy integration to utilize a new
callback to register its lints, as the prior editing of lint store in
Session is no longer possible.
Add lint for debug_assert_with_mut_call
closes#1526
**What does not work:**
* detecting a mut call in the format string itself, e.g. `debug_assert!(false, "{}", vec![1].pop())`
* detecting `*mut T` usage (pointer)
---
changelog: add new lint `debug_assert_with_mut_call`
Fix suggestion of `explicit_counter_loop`
changelog: In the suggestion of `explicit_counter_loop`, if the `for` loop argument doesn't implement `Iterator`, then we suggest `x.into_iter().enumerate()` (or `x.iter{_mut}()` as appropriate). Also, the span of the suggestion has been corrected.
Fixes#4678
This lint will complain when you put a mutable function/method call
inside a `debug_assert` macro, because it will not be executed in
release mode, therefore it will change the execution flow, which is not
wanted.
Add `inefficient_to_string` lint
Closes#4586
changelog: Add `inefficient_to_string` lint, which checks for calling `to_string` on `&&str`, which would bypass the `str`'s specialization
`must_use_unit` lints unit-returning functions with a `#[must_use]`
attribute, suggesting to remove it.
`double_must_use` lints functions with a plain `#[must_use]`
attribute, but which return a type which is already `#[must_use]`,
so the attribute has no benefit.
`must_use_candidate` is a pedantic lint that lints functions and
methods that return some non-unit type that is not already
`#[must_use]` and suggests to add the annotation.
Lints when, on the RHS of a BinOp, there is a UnOp without a space
before the operator but with a space after (e.g. foo >- 1).
Signed-off-by: Nikos Filippakis <nikolaos.filippakis@cern.ch>
Add assert message to suggestion in lint assertions_on_constants
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only updates to the latest nightly, you can leave the
`changelog` entry as `none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- [x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `./util/dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [ ] Run `./util/dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR -->
- [x] suggest replacing `assert!(false, "msg")` with `panic!("msg")`
- [x] extend to allow ~~variables~~ any expression for `"msg"`
- ~~suggest replacing `assert!(false, "msg {}", "arg")` with `panic!("msg {}", "arg")`~~
changelog: add assert message to suggestion in lint assertions_on_constants
Work towards fixing: #3575
Fix typo in inherent_to_string documentation
A simple typo fix in `inherent_to_string` and `inherent_to_string_shadow_display` documentation
changelog: none
account for doc visibility
This fixes#4608.
Also I noticed that the lint failed to look at trait and impl items. There's a small bit of fallout in the code, too, but not enough to warrant its own commit.
changelog: check docs of trait items and impl items, also make `missing_safety_doc` account for visibility
Add check for assert_eq macros to unit_cmp lint
changelog: Add check for unit comparisons through `assert_eq!`, `debug_assert_eq!`, `assert_ne!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros to unit_cmp lint.
fixes#4481
Rollup of 2 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #4509 (Fix false-positive of redundant_clone and move to clippy::perf)
- #4614 (Allow casts from the result of `abs` to unsigned)
Failed merges:
changelog: none
r? @ghost
Fix false positive in `multiple_inherent_impl`
changelog: Fix false positive in `multiple_inherent_impl` by ignoring impls derived from macros.
Closes#4578.
Add a new lint for comparison chains
changelog: Adds a new lint: `comparison_chain`.
`comparison_chain` lints all `if` conditional chains where all the conditions are binary comparisons on the same two operands and will suggest a rewrite with `match`.
Closes#4531.
When license property is missing in Cargo.toml check for license-file
as it may be used instead of the former. The check implemented here is
very naive as it only verifies that the field is present and is not
empty. More scrutiny can be applied by verifying the file is actually
present.
Fixes#4517
#4542 remove machine applicable suggestion
This helps #4542 (but does not completely resolve) by removing the machine applicable suggestion (which was incorrect) for that case.
I would have preferred to fix the machine applicable suggestion to handle format strings, but that's a bit beyond my current understanding of the clippy codebase. I'd be happy to give it a try given some guidance.
changelog: only produce machine applicable suggestions on `explicit_write` lint
Changes cast-lossless to a pedantic lint
As discussed in #4528, this moves the cast-lossless lint from `all` to `pedantic`.
I couldn't tell from description alone if it should also be removed from the complexity category, so I left it as part of complexity for now. I didn't see any impact to the tests from this change, but I could be wrong (as this is my first PR).
fixes#4528
changelog: Moves cast-lossless from default to checking only as a `pedantic` lint.
Fix incorrect swap suggestion
Clippy suggests using swap on fields belonging to the same owner causing two mutable borrows of the owner.
Disclosure: This is my first time working with clippy and rusts HIR. I'm very grateful for assistance and suggestions to improve the PR.
fixes#981
changelog: Fix false positive in `manual_swap` lint
New `is_integer_const` to check more const ints
This mostly affects loop checks and the modulo_one lint. Tests were also updated where applicable.
changelog: none
Changed more `Vec` paths to diagnostic_items
In #4519, I missed a few instances of path matching for `Vec`, so here they are.
r? @oli-obk
changelog: none
Allow block_in_if_{stmt,expr} in external macro
I found this by running `cargo fix --clippy` on quite a big codebase.
You could refactor this assert to
```rust
let block_expr = _;
assert!(block_expr);
```
but,
1. it doesn't increase the readability IMO
2. That isn't possible in a `debug_assert!`
I'm not sure though, if we should allow this for macros in general or just for external macros.
changelog: Allow `block_in_if_{stmt,expr}` in external macros
Simplify `utils::match_def_path`, removing a FIXME
changelog: none
This removes the `Vec<Symbol>` allocation. We still need to call `cx.get_def_path`, but this should already have been interned, and I don't see how we can keep ergonomics of that function without allocating a `Vec`.
r? @phansch
fix misleading doc for explicit_counter_loop lint
changelog: replace misleading examples for explicit_counter_loop & more concise `Why is it bad?` section
This fixes#4472
Clippy suggests using swap on fields belonging to the same owner
causing two mutable borrows of the owner
Fixes#981
Signed-off-by: Cristian Kubis <cristian.kubis@tsunix.de>
Fix missing_const_for_fn false positive
We don't want to lint if the type of the method implements drop.
(constant functions cannot evaluate destructors)
changelog: Fix `missing_const_for_fn` false positive
Fixes#4449
More rustfix tests
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only updates to the latest nightly, you can leave the
`changelog` entry as `none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- [ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- [ ] Executed `./util/dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [ ] Run `./util/dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR -->
cc #3630
This is probably easier reviewed per-commit.
changelog: none
Fix unused_unit false positive
changelog: Fix `unused_unit` false positive
For some reason the `expr` of `stmt.node` didn't contain the expansion information, but the `stmt.span` does.
Fixes#4076
Account for trait alias when looking for defid
I hit the crash on the `expect` call when running clippy on rustc libcore.
Hopefully this will fix it.
changelog: none
Fix some suggestions for redundant_pattern_matching
.. and change the Applicability to `MaybeIncorrect`.
Fixes the problem displayed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4344#issuecomment-519206388.
We now append `{}` to the suggestion so that the conditional has the
correct syntax again.
(If we were to _remove_ the `if` instead, it would trigger the
`unused_must_use` warning for `#[must_use]` types.)
changelog: Fix some suggestions for `redundant_pattern_matching`
Fixes the problem displayed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4344#issuecomment-519206388.
We now append `{}` to the suggestion so that the conditional has the
correct syntax again.
(If we were to _remove_ the `if` instead, it would trigger the
`unused_must_use` warning for `#[must_use]` types.
Add autofixable suggestion for unseparated integer literal suffixes
changelog: Add autofixable suggestion for unseparated integer literal suffixes
Somewhat WIP, since I haven't been able to get this working when adding `// run-rustfix` to `ui/literals.rs`. I think the issue is that there are multiple suggestions operating on one numerical literal, and I'm not sure what the best approach is to work around that.
Thanks
