New lint: manual-range-contains
This fixes#1110, at least for the contains-suggesting part.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: new lint: manual-range-contains
Add lint for `&mut Mutex::lock`
Fixes#1765
changelog: Add lint [`mut_mutex_lock`] for `&mut Mutex::lock` and suggests using `&mut Mutex::get_mut` instead.
Update empty_loop documentation/message.
Originally part of #6161, but now this PR only deals with `std` crates
This change:
- Updates the `std` message .
- Updates the docs to mention how the busy loops should be fixed
- Gives examples of how to do this for `no_std` targets
- Updates the tests/stderr files to test this change.
changelog: Update `empty_loop` lint documentation
Split out statement attributes changes from #78306
This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).
This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.
---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
Add new lint for undropped ManuallyDrop values
Adds a new lint for the following code:
```rust
struct S;
impl Drop for S {
fn drop(&mut self) {
println!("drip drop");
}
}
fn main() {
// This will not drop the `S`!!!
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
unsafe {
// This will.
std::mem::ManuallyDrop::drop(&mut std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
}
}
```
The inner value of a `ManuallyDrop` will not be dropped unless the proper, unsafe drop function is called on it. This lint makes sure that a user does not accidently use the wrong function and forget to drop a `ManuallyDrop` value.
Fixes#5581.
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: none
Add lint for holding RefCell Ref across an await
Fixes#6008
This introduces the lint await_holding_refcell_ref. For async functions, we iterate
over all types in generator_interior_types and look for `core::cell::Ref` or `core::cell::RefMut`. If we find one then we emit a lint.
Heavily cribs from: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/5439
changelog: introduce the await_holding_refcell_ref lint
Lint unnecessary int-to-int and float-to-float casts
This is an implementation of a lint that detects unnecessary casts of number literals, as discussed here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6116
---
changelog: lint unnecessary as-casts of literals when they could be written using literal syntax.
Add large_types_passed_by_value lint
Creates a new lint that checks for large function parameters passed by value. ~Types that are Copy were ignored, because I understand they are explicitly marked as being cheap (or just acceptable) to copy. Arrays were excluded from that restriction because they are always Copy, independently of the size, if the elements are Copy.~ Only Copy types are considered, because if a type is not Copy it cannot be dereferenced, as pointed out by `@ebroto,` and that would require analyzing the whole function body to check if the argument is moved somewhere else. `self` and `mut` parameters are also skipped.
I refactored `trivially_copy_pass_by_ref` and the new lint into a new `pass_by_ref_or_value` module, since both share most of their implementations, as was pointed out to me in #4499.
~Some questions that remain:~
~1. Should `self` be disregarded for this lint?~
~2. Should we special case types like Vec and String when suggesting changes? (to slices and &str)~
~3. What should be the default size limit?~
~4. Are there any special cases I'm missing?~
I ask the maintainers to add the `hacktoberfest-accepted` label if this PR is decent, even if there are some minor details to work out, but I do intend to stick around and finish the job.
Fixes#4499
changelog: Add new lint [`large_types_passed_by_value`]
Refactor trivially_copy_pass_by_ref and the new lint into pass_by_ref_or_value module
Update stderr of conf_unknown_key test
Rename lint to large_types_passed_by_value
Increase `pass_by_value_size_limit` default value to 256
Improve rules for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Improve tests for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Improve documentation for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Make minor corrections to pass_by_ref_or_value.rs suggested by clippy itself
Fix `large_types_passed_by_value` example and improve docs
pass_by_ref_or_value: Tweak check for mut annotation in params
large_types_passed_by_value: add tests for pub trait, trait impl and inline attributes
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
We also update the documentation to note that the remediations are
different for `std` and `no_std` crates.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
