Use absolute path to Rust repo in ra_setup
This will convert the path to the Rust repo to an absolute path. This is
important for the clippy_lints/Cargo.toml file. Otherwise if a relative
path is passed, rst-analyzer won't find the Rust repo, because it starts
the relative path search from the clippy_lints dir, not the
rust-clippy dir where the ra_setup command was run from.
changelog: none
This will convert the path to the Rust repo to an absolute path. This is
important for the clippy_lints/Cargo.toml file. Otherwise if a relative
path is passed, rst-analyzer won't find the Rust repo, because it starts
the relative path search from the clippy_lints dir, not the
rust-clippy dir where the ra_setup command was run from.
In other words, support:
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::new"]` (a free function) in
addition to
`disallowed_methods = ["alloc::vec::Vec::leak"]` (a method).
Improve the documentation to clarify that users must specify the full
qualified path for each disallowed function, which can be confusing for
reexports. Include an example `clippy.toml`.
Simplify the actual lint pass so we can reuse `utils::fn_def_id`.
New Lint: Manual Flatten
This is a draft PR for [Issue 6564](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6564).
r? `@camsteffen`
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Add new lint [`manual_flatten`] to check for loops over a single `if let` expression with `Result` or `Option`.
Fix file names of flat_map_identity test
This patch fixes the file names of the `flat_map_identity` test.
Previously, their names were started with `unnecessary_flat_map` even though the lint rule name is `flat_map_identity`. This inconsistency happened probably because the rule name was changed during the discussion in the PR where this rule was introduced.
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4231
changelog: none
This commit fixes the file names of the `flat_map_identity` test.
Previously, their names were started with `unnecessary_flat_map` even
though the lint rule name is `flat_map_identity`. This inconsistency
happened probably because the rule name was changed during the
discussion in the PR where this rule was introduced.
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4231
Add .editorconfig
This adds a .editorconfig file to rust-lang/rust, matching Clippy's. It's not clear that this will benefit many people, but the cost is low and the rewards are potentially meaningful.
Updated some NITs in the documentation from #6630
I've implemented the two suggestions from #6630 that were added after the merge. This PR also changes the example code to use `register_*_pass` instead of `register_late_pass`. I'm not sure if this is better or worse, but it makes it clearer in my opinion. Let me know if I should change it back.
---
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995`
Box the biggest ast::ItemKind variants
This PR is a different approach on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81400, aiming to save memory in humongous ASTs.
The three affected item kind enums are:
- `ast::ItemKind` (208 -> 112 bytes)
- `ast::AssocItemKind` (176 -> 72 bytes)
- `ast::ForeignItemKind` (176 -> 72 bytes)
Editorconfig is a lightweight specification that
helps maintaining consistent coding/formatting style
accross editors, especially those editors
that are not explicitly aware of Rust and rustfmt.
https://editorconfig.org/
Add new lint "missing_panics_doc"
fixes#1974
changelog: Added the "missing_panics_doc" lint which lints when public functions that may panic are missing "# Panics" in their doc comment
Fix let_and_return false positive
The issue:
See this Rust playground link: https://play.rust-lang.org/?edition=2018&gist=12cb5d1e7527f8c37743b87fc4a53748
Run the above with clippy to see the following warning:
```
warning: returning the result of a `let` binding from a block
--> src/main.rs:24:5
|
23 | let value = Foo::new(&x).value();
| --------------------------------- unnecessary `let` binding
24 | value
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(clippy::let_and_return)]` on by default
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#let_and_return
help: return the expression directly
|
23 |
24 | Foo::new(&x).value()
|
```
Implementing the suggested fix, removing the temporary let binding,
yields a compiler error:
```
error[E0597]: `x` does not live long enough
--> src/main.rs:23:14
|
23 | Foo::new(&x).value()
| ---------^^-
| | |
| | borrowed value does not live long enough
| a temporary with access to the borrow is created here ...
24 | }
| -
| |
| `x` dropped here while still borrowed
| ... and the borrow might be used here, when that temporary is dropped and runs the `Drop` code for type `Foo`
|
= note: the temporary is part of an expression at the end of a block;
consider forcing this temporary to be dropped sooner, before the block's local variables are dropped
help: for example, you could save the expression's value in a new local variable `x` and then make `x` be the expression at the end of the block
|
23 | let x = Foo::new(&x).value(); x
| ^^^^^^^ ^^^
```
The fix:
Of course, clippy looks like it should already handle this edge case;
however, it appears `utils::fn_def_id` is not returning a `DefId` for
`Foo::new`. Changing the `qpath_res` lookup to use the child Path
`hir_id` instead of the parent Call `hir_id` fixes the issue.
changelog: none
Implement Rust 2021 panic
This implements the Rust 2021 versions of `panic!()`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80162 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3007.
It does so by replacing `{std, core}::panic!()` by a bulitin macro that expands to either `$crate::panic::panic_2015!(..)` or `$crate::panic::panic_2021!(..)` depending on the edition of the caller.
This does not yet make std's panic an alias for core's panic on Rust 2021 as the RFC proposes. That will be a separate change: c5273bdfb2 That change is blocked on figuring out what to do with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80846 first.
