This lint checks if Option::take() is used on a temporary value (a value
that is not of type &mut Option and that is not a Place expression) to
suggest omitting take()
Check for loops/closures in `local_used_after_expr`
Follow up to #8646, catches when a local is used multiple times because it's in a loop or a closure
changelog: none
fix unnecessary_to_owned about msrv
This PR fixes ``[`unnecessary_owned`]``.
## What
```rust
# sample code
fn _msrv_1_35() {
#![clippy::msrv = "1.35"]
let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
}
fn _msrv_1_36() {
#![clippy::msrv = "1.36"]
let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
}
```
If we will check this code using clippy, ``[`unnecessary_owned`]`` will modify the code as follows.
```rust
error: unnecessary use of `to_vec`
--> $DIR/unnecessary_to_owned.rs:219:14
|
LL | let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use: `["x"][..].iter().copied()`
error: unnecessary use of `to_vec`
--> $DIR/unnecessary_to_owned.rs:224:14
|
LL | let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use: `["x"][..].iter().copied()`
```
This is incorrect. Because `Iterator::copied` was estabilished in 1.36.
## Why
This bug was caused by not separating "copied" and "clone" by reference to msrv.
89ee6aa6e3/clippy_lints/src/methods/unnecessary_to_owned.rs (L195)
So, I added a conditional branch and described the corresponding test.
Thank you in advance.
changelog: fix wrong suggestions about msrv in [`unnecessary_to_owned`]
r! `@giraffate`
Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
fixes#5714
changelog: Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
Do not trigger ``[`rest_pat_in_fully_bound_structs`]`` on `#[non_exhaustive]` structs
fixes#8029
Just adds an additional check to ensure that the`ty::VariantDef` is not marked as `#[non_exhaustive]`.
changelog: Do not apply ``[`rest_pat_in_fully_bound_structs`]`` on structs marked as non exhaustive.
Prevent infinite (exponential) recursion in only_used_in_recursion
This simplifies the visitor code a bit and prevents checking expressions
multiple times. I still think this lint should be removed for now,
because its code isn't really tested.
Fixes#8689
**NOTE:** Before merging this, we should talk about removing and revisiting this lint. See my comment in #8689
changelog: prevent infinite recursion in [`only_used_in_recursion`]
This simplifies the visitor code a bit and prevents checking expressions
multiple times. I still think this lint should be removed for now,
because its code isn't really tested.
adding condition for map_clone message
This PR fixes the message about `map_clone`.
if msrv >= 1.36, the message is correct.
```bash
$ cat main.rs
fn main() {
let x: Vec<&i32> = vec![&1, &2];
let y: Vec<_> = x.iter().map(|i| *i).collect();
println!("{:?}", y);
}
$ cargo clippy
warning: you are using an explicit closure for copying elements
--> main.rs:3:20
|
3 | let y: Vec<_> = x.iter().map(|i| *i).collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider calling the dedicated `copied` method: `x.iter().copied()`
|
= note: `#[warn(clippy::map_clone)]` on by default
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#map_clone
warning: `test` (build script) generated 1 warning
warning: `test` (bin "test") generated 1 warning (1 duplicate)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.00s
```
but, if msrv < 1.36, the suggestion is `cloned`, but the message is `copying`.
```bash
$ cat clippy.toml
msrv = "1.35"
$ cargo clippy
warning: you are using an explicit closure for copying elements
--> main.rs:3:20
|
3 | let y: Vec<_> = x.iter().map(|i| *i).collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider calling the dedicated `cloned` method: `x.iter().cloned()`
```
I think the separation of messages will make it more user-friendly.
thank you in advance.
changelog: Fixed a message in map_clone.
New lint `is_digit_ascii_radix`
Closes#6399
changelog: Added [`is_digit_ascii_radix`]: recommend `is_ascii_digit()` or `is_ascii_hexdigit()` in place of `is_digit(10)` and `is_digit(16)`
Fix subtraction overflow in `cast_possible_truncation`
changelog: Fix false negative due to subtraction overflow in `cast_possible_truncation`
I *think* a false negative is the worst that can happen from this
Don't lint various match lints when expanded by a proc-macro
fixes#4952
As always for proc-macro output this is a hack-job of a fix. It would be really nice if more proc-macro authors would set spans correctly.
changelog: Don't lint various lints on proc-macro output.
Fix `same_functions_in_if_condition` FP
fixes#8139
changelog: Don't consider `Foo<{ SomeConstant }>` and `Foo<{ SomeOtherConstant }>` to be the same, even if the constants have the same value.
Remove overlap between `manual_split_once` and `needless_splitn`
changelog: Remove overlap between [`manual_split_once`] and [`needless_splitn`]. Fixes some incorrect `rsplitn` suggestions for [`manual_split_once`]
Things that can trigger `needless_splitn` no longer trigger `manual_split_once`, e.g.
```rust
s.[r]splitn(2, '=').next();
s.[r]splitn(2, '=').nth(0);
s.[r]splitn(3, '=').next_tuple();
```
Fixes some suggestions:
```rust
let s = "should not match";
s.rsplitn(2, '.').nth(1);
// old -> Some("should not match")
Some(s.rsplit_once('.').map_or(s, |x| x.0));
// new -> None
s.rsplit_once('.').map(|x| x.0);
s.rsplitn(2, '.').nth(1)?;
// old -> "should not match"
s.rsplit_once('.').map_or(s, |x| x.0);
// new -> early returns
s.rsplit_once('.')?.0;
```
Allow passing `--remove` to `cargo dev setup <SUBCOMMAND>`
changelog: none
Allows passing `--remove` to `cargo dev setup <SUBCOMMAND>` as an alternative to `cargo dev remove ...`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8663
ignore `&x | &y` in unnested_or_patterns
replacing it with `&(x | y)` is actually more characters
Fixes#6973
changelog: [`unnested_or_patterns`] ignore `&x | &y`, nesting would result in more characters
Allow raw lint descriptions
update_lints now understands raw strings in declare_clippy_lint descriptions.
Supersedes #8655
cc `@Alexendoo` thanks for addressing this so quickly. I build a little bit simpler version of your patch. I don't think it really matters what `Literal` we're trying to tokenize, since we assume later, that it is some sort of `str`.
changelog: none
