mistyped_literal_suffix: improve integer suggestions, avoid wrong float suggestions
This PR fixes 2 things:
- The known problem that integer types are always suggested as signed, by suggesting an unsigned suffix for literals that wouldnt fit in the signed type, and ignores any literals too big for the corresponding unsigned type too.
- The lint would only look at the integer part of any floating point literals without an exponent, this causing #6129. This just ignores those literals.
Examples:
```rust
let _ = 2_32; // still 2_i32
let _ = 234_8; // would now suggest 234_u8
// these are now ignored
let _ = 500_8;
let _ = 123_32.123;
```
changelog: suggest correct integer types in [`mistyped_literal_suffix`], ignore float literals without an exponent
fixes#6129
Previously this lint would only look at the integer part of floating
point literals without an exponent, giving wrong suggestions like:
```
|
8 | let _ = 123_32.123;
| ^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean to write: `123.123_f32`
|
```
Instead, it now ignores these literals.
Fixes#6129
Instead of just always suggesting signed suffixes regardless of size
of the value, it now suggests an unsigned suffix when the value wouldn't
fit into the corresponding signed type, and ignores the literal entirely
if it is too big for the unsigned type as well.
wrong_self_convention allows `is_*` to take `&mut self`
fix#8480 and #8513
Allowing `is_*` to take `&self` or none is too restrictive.
changelog: FPs: [`wrong_self_convention`] now allows `&mut self` and no self as arguments for `is_*` methods
`manual_split_once`: lint manual iteration of `SplitN`
changelog: `manual_split_once`: lint manual iteration of `SplitN`
Now lints:
```rust
let mut iter = "a.b.c".splitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next().unwrap();
let second = iter.next().unwrap();
let mut iter = "a.b.c".splitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next()?;
let second = iter.next()?;
let mut iter = "a.b.c".rsplitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next().unwrap();
let second = iter.next().unwrap();
let mut iter = "a.b.c".rsplitn(2, '.');
let first = iter.next()?;
let second = iter.next()?;
```
It suggests (minus leftover whitespace):
```rust
let (first, second) = "a.b.c".split_once('.').unwrap();
let (first, second) = "a.b.c".split_once('.')?;
let (second, first) = "a.b.c".rsplit_once('.').unwrap();
let (second, first) = "a.b.c".rsplit_once('.')?;
```
Currently only lints if the statements are next to each other, as detecting the various kinds of shadowing was tricky, so the following won't lint
```rust
let mut iter = "a.b.c".splitn(2, '.');
let something_else = 1;
let first = iter.next()?;
let second = iter.next()?;
```
Less authoritative stable_sort_primitive message
fixes#8241
Hey all - first contribution here so I'm deciding to start with something small.
Updated the linked message to be less authoritative as well as moved the lint grouping from `perf` to `pedantic` as suggested by `@camsteffen` under the issue.
changelog: [`stable_sort_primitive`]: emit less authoritative message and move to `pedantic`
Fix needless_match false positive for if-let when the else block doesn't match to given expr
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change. Also, it's helpful for us that
the lint name is put into brackets `[]` and backticks `` ` ` ``,
e.g. ``[`lint_name`]``.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
--->
fix#8695
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Fixed ``[`needless_match`]`` false positive when else block expression differs.
Take over: New lint bytes count to len
take over #8375close#8083
This PR adds new lint about considering replacing `.bytes().count()` with `.len()`.
Thank you in advance.
---
r! `@Manishearth`
changelog: adds new lint [`bytes_count_to_len`] to consider replacing `.bytes().count()` with `.len()`
adding test patterns
cargo dev bless
fix comment
add ;
delete :
fix suggestion code
and update stderr in tests.
use match_def_path when checking method name
Report undeclared lifetimes during late resolution.
First step in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91557
We reuse the rib design of the current resolution framework. Specific `LifetimeRib` and `LifetimeRibKind` types are introduced. The most important variant is `LifetimeRibKind::Generics`, which happens each time we encounter something which may introduce generic lifetime parameters. It can be an item or a `for<...>` binder. The `LifetimeBinderKind` specifies how this rib behaves with respect to in-band lifetimes.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Refactor HIR item-like traversal (part 1)
Issue #95004
- Create hir_crate_items query which traverses tcx.hir_crate(()).owners to return a hir::ModuleItems
- use tcx.hir_crate_items in tcx.hir().items() to return an iterator of hir::ItemId
- use tcx.hir_crate_items to introduce a tcx.hir().par_items(impl Fn(hir::ItemId)) to traverse all items in parallel;
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
cc `@cjgillot`
New lint `format_add_strings`
Closes#6261
changelog: Added [`format_add_string`]: recommend using `write!` instead of appending the result of `format!`
Add `usize` cast to `clippy::manual_bits` suggestion
A fix for the suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8213
changelog: [`manual_bits`]: The suggestion now includes a cast for proper type conversion
This adds test to make sure correct behavior of lint
- The first test's option variable is not a temporary variable
- The second test does not make usage of `take()`
- The third test makes usage of `take()` and uses a temporary variable
This lint checks if Option::take() is used on a temporary value (a value
that is not of type &mut Option and that is not a Place expression) to
suggest omitting take()
Check for loops/closures in `local_used_after_expr`
Follow up to #8646, catches when a local is used multiple times because it's in a loop or a closure
changelog: none
fix unnecessary_to_owned about msrv
This PR fixes ``[`unnecessary_owned`]``.
## What
```rust
# sample code
fn _msrv_1_35() {
#![clippy::msrv = "1.35"]
let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
}
fn _msrv_1_36() {
#![clippy::msrv = "1.36"]
let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
}
```
If we will check this code using clippy, ``[`unnecessary_owned`]`` will modify the code as follows.
```rust
error: unnecessary use of `to_vec`
--> $DIR/unnecessary_to_owned.rs:219:14
|
LL | let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use: `["x"][..].iter().copied()`
error: unnecessary use of `to_vec`
--> $DIR/unnecessary_to_owned.rs:224:14
|
LL | let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use: `["x"][..].iter().copied()`
```
This is incorrect. Because `Iterator::copied` was estabilished in 1.36.
## Why
This bug was caused by not separating "copied" and "clone" by reference to msrv.
89ee6aa6e3/clippy_lints/src/methods/unnecessary_to_owned.rs (L195)
So, I added a conditional branch and described the corresponding test.
Thank you in advance.
changelog: fix wrong suggestions about msrv in [`unnecessary_to_owned`]
r! `@giraffate`
Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
fixes#5714
changelog: Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
Do not trigger ``[`rest_pat_in_fully_bound_structs`]`` on `#[non_exhaustive]` structs
fixes#8029
Just adds an additional check to ensure that the`ty::VariantDef` is not marked as `#[non_exhaustive]`.
changelog: Do not apply ``[`rest_pat_in_fully_bound_structs`]`` on structs marked as non exhaustive.
New lint `is_digit_ascii_radix`
Closes#6399
changelog: Added [`is_digit_ascii_radix`]: recommend `is_ascii_digit()` or `is_ascii_hexdigit()` in place of `is_digit(10)` and `is_digit(16)`
Fix subtraction overflow in `cast_possible_truncation`
changelog: Fix false negative due to subtraction overflow in `cast_possible_truncation`
I *think* a false negative is the worst that can happen from this
Don't lint various match lints when expanded by a proc-macro
fixes#4952
As always for proc-macro output this is a hack-job of a fix. It would be really nice if more proc-macro authors would set spans correctly.
changelog: Don't lint various lints on proc-macro output.
Fix `same_functions_in_if_condition` FP
fixes#8139
changelog: Don't consider `Foo<{ SomeConstant }>` and `Foo<{ SomeOtherConstant }>` to be the same, even if the constants have the same value.
Remove overlap between `manual_split_once` and `needless_splitn`
changelog: Remove overlap between [`manual_split_once`] and [`needless_splitn`]. Fixes some incorrect `rsplitn` suggestions for [`manual_split_once`]
Things that can trigger `needless_splitn` no longer trigger `manual_split_once`, e.g.
```rust
s.[r]splitn(2, '=').next();
s.[r]splitn(2, '=').nth(0);
s.[r]splitn(3, '=').next_tuple();
```
Fixes some suggestions:
```rust
let s = "should not match";
s.rsplitn(2, '.').nth(1);
// old -> Some("should not match")
Some(s.rsplit_once('.').map_or(s, |x| x.0));
// new -> None
s.rsplit_once('.').map(|x| x.0);
s.rsplitn(2, '.').nth(1)?;
// old -> "should not match"
s.rsplit_once('.').map_or(s, |x| x.0);
// new -> early returns
s.rsplit_once('.')?.0;
```
- Create hir_crate_items query which traverses tcx.hir_crate(()).owners to return a hir::ModuleItems
- use tcx.hir_crate_items in tcx.hir().items() to return an iterator of hir::ItemId
- add par_items(impl Fn(hir::ItemId)) to traverse all items in parallel
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
ignore `&x | &y` in unnested_or_patterns
replacing it with `&(x | y)` is actually more characters
Fixes#6973
changelog: [`unnested_or_patterns`] ignore `&x | &y`, nesting would result in more characters
Add a lint to detect cast to unsigned for abs() and suggest unsigned_…
…abs()
changelog: Add a [`cast_abs_to_unsigned`] that checks for uses of `abs()` that are cast to the corresponding unsigned integer type and suggest to replace them with `unsigned_abs()`.
Fix `as_deref_mut` false positives in `needless_option_as_deref`
Also moves it into `methods/`
Fixes#7846Fixes#8047
changelog: [`needless_option_as_deref`]: No longer lints for `as_deref_mut` on Options that cannot be moved
supersedes #8064
fix FP in lint `[needless_match]`
fixes: #8542fixes: #8551fixes: #8595fixes: #8599
---
changelog: check for more complex custom type, and ignore type coercion in [`needless_match`]
Suggest from_utf8_unchecked in const contexts
Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to check whether a given expression is in an `unsafe` context or not, so I just unconditionally emit the wrapping `unsafe {}` block in the suggestion. If there is an easy way to get it to work better then I would love to hear it.
changelog: Suggest `from_utf8_unchecked` instead of `from_utf8` in const contexts for ``[`transmute_bytes_to_str`]``
refs: #8379
Fix unnecessary_cast suggestion for type aliasses
Fix#6923. The [`unnecessary_cast`] lint now will skip casting to non-primitive type.
changelog: fix lint [`unnecessary_cast `]
`indexing_slicing` should not fire if a valid array index comes from a constant function that is evaluated at compile-time
fix#8348
changelog: [`indexing_slicing`] fewer false positives in `const` contexts and with `const` indices
Rework `undocumented_unsafe_blocks`
fixes: #8264fixes: #8449
One thing came up while working on this. Currently comments on the same line are supported like so:
```rust
/* SAFETY: reason */ unsafe {}
```
Is this worth supporting at all? Anything other than a couple of words doesn't really fit well.
edit: [zulip topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/.60undocumented_unsafe_blocks.60.20same.20line.20comment)
changelog: Don't lint `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` when the unsafe block comes from a proc-macro.
changelog: Don't lint `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` when the preceding line has a safety comment and the unsafe block is a sub-expression.
add `empty_structs_with_brackets`
<!-- Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only includes internal changes, you can just write
`changelog: none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change. Also, it's helpful for us that
the lint name is put into brackets `[]` and backticks `` ` ` ``,
e.g. ``[`lint_name`]``.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[ ] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR.
--
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
-->
Closes#8591
I'm already sorry for the massive diff 😅
changelog: New lint [`empty_structs_with_brackets`]
single_element_loop: handle arrays for Edition2021
changelog: [`single_element_loop`] handle arrays in Edition 2021, handle `.iter_mut()` and `.into_iter()`, and wrap in parens if necessary
Add `crate_in_macro_def` lint
This PR adds a lint to check for `crate` as opposed to `$crate` used in a macro definition.
I think this can close#4798. That issue focused on the case where the macro author "imports something into said macro."
But I think use of `crate` is likely to be a bug whether it appears in a `use` statement or not. There could be some use case I am failing to see, though. (cc: `@nilscript` `@flip1995)`
changelog: `crate_in_macro_def`
new lint: `only_used_in_recursion`
changed:
- added `only_used_in_recursion`.
- fixed code that variables are only used in recursion.
- this would not lint when `unused_variable`
This fixes: #8390
-----
changelog: add lint [`only_used_in_recursion`]
Llint for casting between raw slice pointers with different element sizes
This lint disallows using `as` to convert from a raw pointer to a slice (e.g. `*const [i32]`, `*mut [Foo]`) to any other raw pointer to a slice if the element types have different sizes. When a raw slice pointer is cast, the data pointer and count metadata are preserved. This means that when the size of the inner slice's element type changes, the total number of bytes pointed to by the count changes. For example a `*const [i32]` with length 4 (four `i32` elements) is cast `as *const [u8]` the resulting pointer points to four `u8` elements at the same address, losing most of the data. When the size *increases* the resulting pointer will point to *more* data, and accessing that data will be UB.
On its own, *producing* the pointer isn't actually a problem, but because any use of the pointer as a slice will either produce surprising behavior or cause UB I believe this is a correctness lint. If the pointer is not intended to be used as a slice, the user should instead use any of a number of methods to produce just a data pointer including an `as` cast to a thin pointer (e.g. `p as *const i32`) or if the pointer is being created from a slice, the `as_ptr` method on slices. Detecting the intended use of the pointer is outside the scope of this lint, but I believe this lint will also lead users to realize that a slice pointer is only for slices.
There is an exception to this lint when either of the slice element types are zero sized (e.g `*mut [()]`). The total number of bytes pointed to by the slice with a zero sized element is zero. In that case preserving the length metadata is likely intended as a workaround to get the length metadata of a slice pointer though a zero sized slice.
The lint does not forbid casting pointers to slices with the *same* element size as the cast was likely intended to reinterpret the data in the slice as some equivalently sized data and the resulting pointer will behave as intended.
---
changelog: Added ``[`cast_slice_different_sizes`]``, a lint that disallows using `as`-casts to convert between raw pointers to slices when the elements have different sizes.
Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the
beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing
the output to be *worse*.
This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole
file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
Add lint to detect `allow` attributes without reason
I was considering putting this lint into the pedantic group. However, that would result in countless warnings for existing projects. Having it in restriction also seems good to me 🙃 (And now I need sleep 💤 )
---
changelog: New lint [`allow_lint_without_reason`] (Requires the `lint_reasons` feature)
Closes: rust-lang/rust-clippy#8502
Add `unnecessary_find_map` lint
This PR adds an `unnecessary_find_map` lint. It is essentially just a minor enhancement of `unnecessary_filter_map`.
Closes#8467
changelog: New lint `unnecessary_find_map`
fix false positives of large_enum_variant
fixes: #8321
The size of enums containing generic type was calculated to be 0.
I changed [large_enum_variant] so that such enums are not linted.
changelog: none
Don't lint `match` expressions with `cfg`ed arms
Somehow there are no open issues related to this for any of the affected lints. At least none that I could fine from a quick search.
changelog: Don't lint `match` expressions with `cfg`ed arms in many cases
Fix `await_holding_lock` not linting `parking_lot` Mutex/RwLock
This adds tests for `RwLock` and `parking_lot::{Mutex, RwLock}`, which were added before in 2dc8c083f5, but never tested in UI tests. I noticed this while reading [fasterthanli.me](https://fasterthanli.me/articles/a-rust-match-made-in-hell) latest blog post, complaining that Clippy doesn't catch this for `parking_lot`. (Too many people read his blog, he's too powerful)
Some more things:
- Adds a test for #6446
- Improves the lint message
changelog: [`await_holding_lock`]: Now also lints for `parking_lot::{Mutex, RwLock}`
Improve `redundant_slicing` lint
fixes#7972fixes#7257
This can supersede #7976
changelog: Fix suggestion for `redundant_slicing` when re-borrowing for a method call
changelog: New lint `deref_as_slicing`
Don't lint `needless_borrow` in method receiver positions
fixes#8408fixes#8407fixes#8391fixes#8367fixes#8380
This is a temporary fix for `needless_borrow`. The proper fix is included in #8355.
This should probably be merged into rustc before beta branches on Friday. This issue has been reported six or seven times in the past couple of weeks.
changelog: Fix various issues with `needless_borrow` n´. Note to changelog writer: those issues might have been introduced in this release cycle, so this might not matter in the changelog.
Don't lint Default::default if it is the udpate syntax base
changelog: Don't lint `Default::default` it is part of the update syntax
Current clippy warns about this:
```
warning: calling `Foo::default()` is more clear than this expression
--> src/main.rs:12:11
|
12 | ..Default::default()
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `Foo::default()`
|
```
With these changes, it will not lint that particular expression anymore.
The to_string_in_display lint is renamed to recursive_format_impl
A check is added for the use of self formatted with Display or Debug
inside any format string in the same impl
The to_string_in_display check is kept as is - like in the
format_in_format_args lint
For now only Display and Debug are checked
This could also be extended to other Format traits (Binary, etc.)
Fix `transmute_undefined_repr` with single field `#[repr(C)]` structs
Fixes: #8417
The description has also been made more precise.
changelog: Fix `transmute_undefined_repr` with single field `#[repr(C)]` structs
changelog: Move `transmute_undefined_repr` back to `correctness`
Support `cargo dev bless` for tests with revisions
changelog: internal: Support `cargo dev bless` for tests with revisions
Previously bless wouldn't pick up the saved stderr from `target/debug/tests/manual_assert.stage-id.edition2021.stderr` or `target/debug/tests/manual_assert.stage-id.edition2018.stderr` due to there being multiple revisions of the test output
This tweaks compile-test so the built files end up in e.g. `target/debug/tests/ui`, `target/debug/tests/ui-cargo` rather than share the `tests` dir. `cargo dev bless` then uses that to update all the `.stdout/stdout/fixed` files it can find
Also removes an empty file I found, and the logic to remove empty outputs as compiletest doesn't produce empty `.stdout/stderr` files
Add lint `transmute_undefined_repr`
Partially implements #3999 and #546
This doesn't consider `enum`s at all right now as those are going to be a pain to deal with. This also allows `#[repr(Rust)]` structs with only one non-zero sized fields. I think those are technically undefined when transmuted.
changelog: Add lint `transmute_undefined_repr`
Add `explicit_write` suggestions for `write!`s with format args
changelog: Add [`explicit_write`] suggestions for `write!`s with format args
Fixes#4542
```rust
writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();
```
Now suggests:
```
error: use of `writeln!(stderr(), ...).unwrap()`
--> $DIR/explicit_write.rs:36:9
|
LL | writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `eprintln!("macro arg {}", one!())`
```
---------
r? `@camsteffen` (again, sorry 😛) for the `FormatArgsExpn` change
Before this change `inputs_span` returned a span pointing to just `1` in
```rust
macro_rules! one {
() => { 1 };
}
`writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();`
```
And the `source_callsite` of that span didn't include the format string, it was just `one!()`
make unwrap_used also trigger on .get().unwrap()
fixes#8124
changelog: make the [unwrap_used] lint trigger for code of the form such as `.get(i).unwrap()` and `.get_mut(i).unwrap()`
[explicit_counter_loop] suggests `.into_iter()`, despite that triggering [into_iter_on_ref] in some cases
I have modified `fn make_iterator_snippet` in clippy_lints/src/loops/utils.rs ,so this change has some little influence on another lint [manual_flatten] .
fixes#8155
---
changelog: Fix that [`explicit_counter_loop`] suggests `into_iter()` despite that triggering [`into_iter_on_ref`] in some cases
single_match: Don't lint non-exhaustive matches; support tuples
`single_match` lint:
* Don't lint exhaustive enum patterns without a wild.
Rationale: The definition of the enum could be changed, so the user can get non-exhaustive match after applying the suggested lint (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1013566068 for context).
* Lint `match` constructions with tuples (as suggested at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1015621148)
Closes#8282
---
changelog: [`single_match`]: Don't lint exhaustive enum patterns without a wild.
changelog: [`single_match`]: Lint `match` constructions with tuples
Fix underflow in `manual_split_once` lint
Hi, a friend found clippy started crashing on a suspiciously large allocation of `u64::MAX` memory on their code.
The mostly minimized repro is:
```rust
fn _f01(title: &str) -> Option<()> {
let _ = title[1..].splitn(2, '[').next()?;
Some(())
}
```
The underflow happens in this case on line 57 of the patch but I've changed the other substraction to saturating as well since it could potentially cause the same issue.
I'm not sure where to put a regression test, or if it's even worth for such a thing.
Aside, has it been considered before to build clippy with overflow checks enabled?
changelog: fix ICE of underflow in `manual_split_once` lint
Fix `needless_borrow` causing mutable borrows to be moved
fixes#8191
changelog: Fix `needless_borrow` causing mutable borrows to be moved
changelog: Rename `ref_in_deref` to `needless_borrow`
changelog: Suggest removing the borrow on method call receivers in `needless_borrow`
Check usages in `ptr_arg`
fixes#214fixes#1981fixes#3381fixes#6406fixes#6964
This does not take into account the return type of the function currently, so `(&Vec<_>) -> &Vec<_>` functions may still be false positives.
The name given for the type also has to match the real type name, so `type Foo = Vec<u32>` won't trigger the lint, but `type Vec = Vec<u32>` will. I'm not sure if this is the best way to handle this, or if a note about the actual type should be added instead.
changelog: Check if the argument is used in a way which requires the original type in `ptr_arg`
changelog: Lint mutable references in `ptr_arg`
This commit changes the behavior of `single_match` lint.
After that, we won't lint non-exhaustive matches like this:
```rust
match Some(v) {
Some(a) => println!("${:?}", a),
None => {},
}
```
The rationale is that, because the type of `a` could be changed, so the
user can get non-exhaustive match after applying the suggested lint (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1013566068
for context).
We also will lint `match` constructions with tuples. When we see the
tuples on the both arms, we will check them both at the same time, and
if they form exhaustive match, we could display the warning.
Closes#8282
fix op_ref false positive
fixes#7572
changelog: `op_ref` don't lint for unnecessary reference in BinOp impl if removing the reference will lead to unconditional recursion
issue #8239: Printed hint for lint or_fun_call is cropped and does no…
fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#8239
changelog: [`or_fun_call`]: if suggestion contains more lines than MAX_SUGGESTION_HIGHLIGHT_LINES it is stripped to one line
* Track the argument when used to initialize simple `let` bindings
* Check if the argument is passed to a function requiring the original type
* Use `multipart_suggestion` rather than multiple suggestions
* Check if the name given in the source code matches the name of the actual type
`manual_memcpy` fix
fixes#8160
Ideally this would work with `VecDeque`, but the current interface is unsuitable for it. At a minimum something like `range_as_slices` would be needed.
changelog: Don't lint `manual_memcpy` on `VecDeque`
changelog: Suggest `copy_from_slice` for `manual_memcpy` when applicable
This pull request adds a lint against single character lifetime names, as they might not divulge enough information about the purpose of the lifetime. This can make code harder to understand. I placed this in `restriction` rather than `pedantic` (as suggested in #8233) since most of the Rust ecosystem already uses single character lifetime names (to my knowledge, at least) and since single character lifetime names aren't incorrect. I'd be happy to change this upon request, however. Fixes#8233.
- [x] Followed lint naming conventions
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [x] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- [x] Added lint documentation
- [x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
changelog: new lint: [`single_char_lifetime_names`]
Better detect when a field can be moved from in `while_let_on_iterator`
fixes#8113
changelog: Better detect when a field can be moved from in `while_let_on_iterator`
Fix `type_repetition_in_bounds`
fixes#7360fixes#8162fixes#8056
changelog: Check for full equality in `type_repetition_in_bounds` rather than just equal hashes
New macro utils
changelog: none
Sorry, this is a big one. A lot of interrelated changes and I wanted to put the new utils to use to make sure they are somewhat battle-tested. We may want to divide some of the lint-specific refactoring commits into batches for smaller reviewing tasks. I could also split into more PRs.
Introduces a bunch of new utils at `clippy_utils::macros::...`. Please read through the docs and give any feedback! I'm happy to introduce `MacroCall` and various functions to retrieve an instance. It feels like the missing puzzle piece. I'm also introducing `ExpnId` from rustc as "useful for Clippy too". `@rust-lang/clippy`
Fixes#7843 by not parsing every node of macro implementations, at least the major offenders.
I probably want to get rid of `is_expn_of` at some point.
changelog: none
Sorry, this is a big one. A lot of interrelated changes and I wanted to put the new utils to use to make sure they are somewhat battle-tested. We may want to divide some of the lint-specific refactoring commits into batches for smaller reviewing tasks. I could also split into more PRs.
Introduces a bunch of new utils at `clippy_utils::macros::...`. Please read through the docs and give any feedback! I'm happy to introduce `MacroCall` and various functions to retrieve an instance. It feels like the missing puzzle piece. I'm also introducing `ExpnId` from rustc as "useful for Clippy too". `@rust-lang/clippy`
Fixes#7843 by not parsing every node of macro implementations, at least the major offenders.
I probably want to get rid of `is_expn_of` at some point.
wrong_self_convention: Match `SelfKind::No` more restrictively
The `wrong_self_convention` lint uses a `SelfKind` type to decide
whether a method has the right kind of "self" for its name, or whether
the kind of "self" it has makes its name confusable for a method in
a common trait. One possibility is `SelfKind::No`, which is supposed
to mean "No `self`".
Previously, SelfKind::No matched everything _except_ Self, including
references to Self. This patch changes it to match Self, &Self, &mut
Self, Box<Self>, and so on.
For example, this kind of method was allowed before:
```
impl S {
// Should trigger the lint, because
// "methods called `is_*` usually take `self` by reference or no `self`"
fn is_foo(&mut self) -> bool { todo!() }
}
```
But since SelfKind::No matched "&mut self", no lint was triggered
(see #8142).
With this patch, the code above now gives a lint as expected.
fixes#8142
changelog: [`wrong_self_convention`] rejects `self` references in more cases
Inspired by a discussion in rust-lang/rust-clippy#8197
---
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: none
The lint is this on nightly, therefore no changelog entry for you xD
