Implement rustc side of report-future-incompat
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71249
This is an alternative to `@pnkfelix's` initial implementation in https://github.com/pnkfelix/rust/commits/prototype-rustc-side-of-report-future-incompat (mainly because I started working before seeing that branch 😄 ).
My approach outputs the entire original `Diagnostic`, in a way that is compatible with incremental compilation. This is not yet integrated with compiletest, but can be used manually by passing `-Z emit-future-incompat-report` to `rustc`.
Several changes are made to support this feature:
* The `librustc_session/lint` module is moved to a new crate `librustc_lint_defs` (name bikesheddable). This allows accessing lint definitions from `librustc_errors`.
* The `Lint` struct is extended with an `Option<FutureBreakage>`. When present, it indicates that we should display a lint in the future-compat report. `FutureBreakage` contains additional information that we may want to display in the report (currently, a `date` field indicating when the crate will stop compiling).
* A new variant `rustc_error::Level::Allow` is added. This is used when constructing a diagnostic for a future-breakage lint that is marked as allowed (via `#[allow]` or `--cap-lints`). This allows us to capture any future-breakage diagnostics in one place, while still discarding them before they are passed to the `Emitter`.
* `DiagnosticId::Lint` is extended with a `has_future_breakage` field, indicating whether or not the `Lint` has future breakage information (and should therefore show up in the report).
* `Session` is given access to the `LintStore` via a new `SessionLintStore` trait (since `librustc_session` cannot directly reference `LintStore` without a cyclic dependency). We use this to turn a string `DiagnosticId::Lint` back into a `Lint`, to retrieve the `FutureBreakage` data.
Currently, `FutureBreakage.date` is always set to `None`. However, this could potentially be interpreted by Cargo in the future.
I've enabled the future-breakage report for the `ARRAY_INTO_ITER` lint, which can be used to test out this PR. The intent is to use the field to allow Cargo to determine the date of future breakage (as described in [RFC 2834](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2834-cargo-report-future-incompat.md)) without needing to parse the diagnostic itself.
cc `@pnkfelix`
- Implement `field_reassign_with_default` as a `LateLintPass`
- Avoid triggering `default_trait_access` on a span already linted by
`field_reassigned_with_default`
- Merge `default_trait_access` and `field_reassign_with_default` into
`Default`
- Co-authored-by: Eduardo Broto <ebroto@tutanota.com>
- Fixes#568
Disable and enable when not specifically explained were not clear to me
as an English language speaker, but I was able to figure it out fairly
easily due to the examples having A/W, which I assumed meant `allow` and
`warn`. I removed both words to be sure it was clear as well as
extending the note on what deny means. It now includes a statement on
exactly what each word means.
Update the existing arithmetic lint
re: #6209
Updates the lint to not the error message if RHS of binary operation `/` of `%` is a literal/constant that is not `0` or `-1`, as suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6209#issuecomment-715624354)
changelog: Expand [`integer_arithmetic`] to work with RHS literals and constants
fix the error-causing suggestion of 'borrowed_box'
Fixes#3128
Fix the suggestion of 'borrowed_box', which causes a syntax error because it misses necessary parentheses.
---
changelog: Fix the error-causing suggestion of 'borrowed_box'
Add lint for comparing to empty slices instead of using .is_empty()
Hey first time making a clippy lint
I added the implementation of the lint the `len_zero` since it shared a lot of the code, I would otherwise have to rewrite. Just tell me if the lint should use it's own file instead
changelog: Add lint for comparing to empty slices
Fixes#6217
Lint items after statements in local macro expansions
The items_after_statements lint was skipping all expansions. Instead
we should still lint local macros.
Fixes#578
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: The items_after_statements now applies to local macro expansions
No lint in macro for `toplevel_ref_arg`
Do not lint when the span is from a macro.
Question: shouldn't we extend this for external macros also ?
Fixes: #5849
changelog: none
