Emit `if_let_mutex` in presence of other mutexes
Currently (master, not nightly nor stable) `if_let_mutex` does not emit a warning here:
```rs
let m1 = Mutex::new(10);
let m2 = Mutex::new(());
if let 100..=200 = *m1.lock().unwrap() {
m2.lock();
} else {
m1.lock();
}
```
It currently looks for the first call to `.lock()` on *any* mutex receiver inside of the if/else body, and only later (outside of the visitor) checks that the receiver matches the mutex in the scrutinee. That means that in cases like the above, it finds the `m2.lock()` expression, stops the visitor, fails the check that it's the same mutex (`m2` != `m1`) and then does not look for any other `.lock()` calls.
So, just make the receiver check also part of the visitor so that we only stop the visitor when we also find the right receiver.
The first commit has the actual changes described here. The sceond one just unnests all the `if let`s
----
changelog: none
`missing_trait_methods`: lint methods in definition order
Lintcheck for #13157 showed a bunch of changes for `missing_trait_methods`
This is because `values_sorted` was sorting the entries by the key's [`DefPathHash`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_span/def_id/struct.DefPathHash.html), this is stable for a given compiler but can change across versions
changelog: none
Fix while_let_on_iterator dropping loop label when applying fix.
Loop label was not persisted when displaying help and was therefore producing broken rust code when applying fixes.
Solution was to store the `ast::Label` when creating a `higher::WhileLet` from an expression and add the label name to the lint suggestion and diagnostics.
---
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13123
changelog: [`while_let_on_iterator`]: Fix issue dropping loop label when displaying help and applying fixes.
Add `BTreeSet` detection to the `set_contains_or_insert` lint
* Detect `BTreeSet::contains` + `BTreeSet::insert` usage in the same way as with the `HashSet`.
CC: `@lochetti` `@bitfield`
----
changelog: [`set_contains_or_insert`]: Handle `BTreeSet` in addition to `HashSet`
Make `std_instead_of_core` somewhat MSRV aware
For #13158, this catches some things e.g. `core::net` and the recently stable `core::error` but not things moved individually like `UnwindSafe`, as far as I can see the version for those isn't easily available
Beta nominating since ideally we'd get this change in the same version as `core::error` becomes stable
cc `@kpreid`
changelog: none
Stabilize const `{integer}::from_str_radix` i.e. `const_int_from_str`
This PR stabilizes the feature `const_int_from_str`.
- ACP Issue: rust-lang/libs-team#74
- Implementation PR: rust-lang/rust#99322
- Part of Tracking Issue: rust-lang/rust#59133
API Change Diff:
```diff
impl {integer} {
- pub fn from_str_radix(src: &str, radix: u32) -> Result<Self, ParseIntError>;
+ pub const fn from_str_radix(src: &str, radix: u32) -> Result<Self, ParseIntError>;
}
impl ParseIntError {
- pub fn kind(&self) -> &IntErrorKind;
+ pub const fn kind(&self) -> &IntErrorKind;
}
```
This makes it easier to parse integers at compile-time, e.g.
the example from the Tracking Issue:
```rust
env!("SOMETHING").parse::<usize>().unwrap()
```
could now be achived with
```rust
match usize::from_str_radix(env!("SOMETHING"), 10) {
Ok(val) => val,
Err(err) => panic!("Invalid value for SOMETHING environment variable."),
}
```
rather than having to depend on a library that implements or manually implement the parsing at compile-time.
---
Checklist based on [Libs Stabilization Guide - When there's const involved](https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/development/stabilization.html#when-theres-const-involved)
I am treating this as a [partial stabilization](https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/development/stabilization.html#partial-stabilizations) as it shares a tracking issue (and is rather small), so directly opening the partial stabilization PR for the subset (feature `const_int_from_str`) being stabilized.
- [x] ping Constant Evaluation WG
- [x] no unsafe involved
- [x] no `#[allow_internal_unstable]`
- [ ] usage of `intrinsic::const_eval_select` rust-lang/rust#124625 in `from_str_radix_assert` to change the error message between compile-time and run-time
- [ ] [rust-labg/libs-api FCP](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124941#issuecomment-2207021921)
needless_borrows_for_generic_args: Fix for &mut
This commit fixes a bug introduced in #12706, where the behavior of the lint has been changed, to avoid suggestions that introduce a move. The motivation in the commit message is quite poor (if the detection for significant drops is not sufficient because it's not transitive, the proper fix would be to make it transitive). However, #12454, the linked issue, provides a good reason for the change — if the value being borrowed is bound to a variable, then moving it will only introduce friction into future refactorings.
Thus #12706 changes the logic so that the lint triggers if the value being borrowed is Copy, or is the result of a function call, simplifying the logic to the point where analysing "is this the only use of this value" isn't necessary.
However, said PR also introduces an undocumented carveout, where referents that themselves are mutable references are treated as Copy, to catch some cases that we do want to lint against. However, that is not sound — it's possible to consume a mutable reference by moving it.
To avoid emitting false suggestions, this PR reintroduces the referent_used_exactly_once logic and runs that check for referents that are themselves mutable references.
Thinking about the code shape of &mut x, where x: &mut T, raises the point that while removing the &mut outright won't work, the extra indirection is still undesirable, and perhaps instead we should suggest reborrowing: &mut *x. That, however, is left as possible future work.
Fixes#12856
changelog: none
Implement lint against ambiguous negative literals
This PR implements a lint against ambiguous negative literals with a literal and method calls right after it.
## `ambiguous_negative_literals`
(deny-by-default)
The `ambiguous_negative_literals` lint checks for cases that are confusing between a negative literal and a negation that's not part of the literal.
### Example
```rust,compile_fail
-1i32.abs(); // equals -1, while `(-1i32).abs()` equals 1
```
### Explanation
Method calls take precedence over unary precedence. Setting the precedence explicitly makes the code clearer and avoid potential bugs.
<details>
<summary>Old proposed lint</summary>
## `ambiguous_unary_precedence`
(deny-by-default)
The `ambiguous_unary_precedence` lint checks for use the negative unary operator with a literal and method calls.
### Example
```rust
-1i32.abs(); // equals -1, while `(-1i32).abs()` equals 1
```
### Explanation
Unary operations take precedence on binary operations and method calls take precedence over unary precedence. Setting the precedence explicitly makes the code clearer and avoid potential bugs.
</details>
-----
Note: This is a strip down version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117161, without the binary op precedence.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117155
`@rustbot` labels +I-lang-nominated
cc `@scottmcm`
r? compiler
Fix running compile-test under cargo nextest
`ui_test` itself has `cargo nextest` support which we now use - https://github.com/oli-obk/ui_test/pull/161
It prints `ui_test` as its test name whereas we printed `compile_test`, this ended up being treated as a test name filter causing all the tests to be filtered out
changelog: none
Misc refactorings part 5
`toplevel_ref_arg` gets a small fix so it can be allowed on function arguments. Otherwise just some rearrangements.
changelog: none
add lint for recreation of an entire struct
This lint makes Clippy warn about situations where an owned struct is
essentially recreated by moving all its fields into a new instance of
the struct. The lint is not machine-applicable because the source
struct may have been partially moved.
This lint originated in something I spotted during peer review. While
working on their branch a colleague ended up with a commit where a
function returned a struct that 1:1 replicated one of its owned inputs
from its members. Initially I suspected they hadn’t run their code
through Clippy but AFAICS there is no lint for this situation yet.
changelog: new lint: [`redundant_owned_struct_recreation`]
### New lint checklist
- \[+] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[+] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[+] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[+] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[+] Added lint documentation
- \[+] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[`pathbuf_init_then_push`]: Checks for calls to `push` immediately a…
changelog: [`pathbuf_init_then_push`]: new lint: Checks for calls to `push` immediately after creating a new `PathBuf`
Just a mirror of VEC_INIT_THEN_PUSH
