restriction lint for `std::process::exit`
Addition to #4655 - adds the lint checking for `std::process::exit`
changelog: add restriction lint for `std::process::exit`
build: improve script and travis config
* fix a diff failure on windows
See https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/jobs/245971932#L1625
for an example.
* use cmp instead of diff > /dev/null
* clone single branch instead of clone then checking out
* do not decrypt key if have no diff change
changelog: none
Add lint for debug_assert_with_mut_call
closes#1526
**What does not work:**
* detecting a mut call in the format string itself, e.g. `debug_assert!(false, "{}", vec![1].pop())`
* detecting `*mut T` usage (pointer)
---
changelog: add new lint `debug_assert_with_mut_call`
Fix suggestion of `explicit_counter_loop`
changelog: In the suggestion of `explicit_counter_loop`, if the `for` loop argument doesn't implement `Iterator`, then we suggest `x.into_iter().enumerate()` (or `x.iter{_mut}()` as appropriate). Also, the span of the suggestion has been corrected.
Fixes#4678
This lint will complain when you put a mutable function/method call
inside a `debug_assert` macro, because it will not be executed in
release mode, therefore it will change the execution flow, which is not
wanted.
`must_use_unit` lints unit-returning functions with a `#[must_use]`
attribute, suggesting to remove it.
`double_must_use` lints functions with a plain `#[must_use]`
attribute, but which return a type which is already `#[must_use]`,
so the attribute has no benefit.
`must_use_candidate` is a pedantic lint that lints functions and
methods that return some non-unit type that is not already
`#[must_use]` and suggests to add the annotation.
Lints when, on the RHS of a BinOp, there is a UnOp without a space
before the operator but with a space after (e.g. foo >- 1).
Signed-off-by: Nikos Filippakis <nikolaos.filippakis@cern.ch>
Add assert message to suggestion in lint assertions_on_constants
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only updates to the latest nightly, you can leave the
`changelog` entry as `none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- [x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `./util/dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [ ] Run `./util/dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR -->
- [x] suggest replacing `assert!(false, "msg")` with `panic!("msg")`
- [x] extend to allow ~~variables~~ any expression for `"msg"`
- ~~suggest replacing `assert!(false, "msg {}", "arg")` with `panic!("msg {}", "arg")`~~
changelog: add assert message to suggestion in lint assertions_on_constants
Work towards fixing: #3575
account for doc visibility
This fixes#4608.
Also I noticed that the lint failed to look at trait and impl items. There's a small bit of fallout in the code, too, but not enough to warrant its own commit.
changelog: check docs of trait items and impl items, also make `missing_safety_doc` account for visibility
