We skip the lint if the `loop {}` is in the `#[panic_handler]` as the
main recommendation we give is to panic, which obviously isn't
possible in a panic handler.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Provide diagnostic suggestion in ExprUseVisitor Delegate
The [Delegate trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38)) currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
r? `@ghost`
The [Delegate
trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38))
currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
Update empty_loop documentation/message.
Originally part of #6161, but now this PR only deals with `std` crates
This change:
- Updates the `std` message .
- Updates the docs to mention how the busy loops should be fixed
- Gives examples of how to do this for `no_std` targets
- Updates the tests/stderr files to test this change.
changelog: Update `empty_loop` lint documentation
We also update the documentation to note that the remediations are
different for `std` and `no_std` crates.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Expands `manual_memcpy` to lint ones with loop counters
Closes#1670
This PR expands `manual_memcpy` to lint ones with loop counters as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/1670#issuecomment-293280204
Although the current code is working, I have a couple of questions and concerns.
~~Firstly, I manually implemented `Clone` for `Sugg` because `AssocOp` lacks `Clone`. As `AssocOp` only holds an enum, which is `Copy`, as a value, it seems `AssocOp` can be `Clone`; but, I was not sure where to ask it. Should I make a PR to `rustc`?~~ The [PR]( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73629) was made.
Secondly, manual copying with loop counters are likely to trigger `needless_range_loop` and `explicit_counter_loop` along with `manual_memcpy`; in fact, I explicitly allowed them in the tests. Is there any way to disable these two lints when a code triggers `manual_memcpy`?
And, another thing I'd like to note is that `Sugg` adds unnecessary parentheses when expressions with parentheses passed to its `hir` function, as seen here:
```
error: it looks like you're manually copying between slices
--> $DIR/manual_memcpy.rs:145:14
|
LL | for i in 3..(3 + src.len()) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try replacing the loop by: `dst[3..((3 + src.len()))].clone_from_slice(&src[..((3 + src.len()) - 3)])
```
However, using the `hir` function is needed to prevent the suggestion causing errors when users use bitwise operations; and also this have already existed, for example: `verbose_bit_mask`. Thus, I think this is fine.
changelog: Expands `manual_memcpy` to lint ones with loop counters
Fix a false positive in `explicit_counter_loop` where the loop counter is used after incremented,
adjust the test so that counters are incremented at the end of the loop
and add the test for this false positive.
