Revert the random_state lint.
Remove the random_state lint until it or rustc has been fixed to no longer crash with debug assertions (see #3628)
We can't update clippy in the rustc repo because of this which is blocking nightlies because toolstate is already broken.
fixes#3628
Add run-rustfix where it already works
This PR adds `// run-rustfix` headers to tests for `MachineApplicable` lints where
applying the suggestions works without any errors.
Trigger `use_self` lint in local macros
Closes#2098
The test currently only covers local macros. #2098 suggested this:
> You could add the macro in question into the `mini_macro` subcrate
But that doesn't work for a `macro_rules`:
```
error: cannot export macro_rules! macros from a `proc-macro` crate type currently
```
So I suggest leaving out the test for external macros, as using `in_external_macro` seems straigtforward enough. Alternatives would be to use to add an additional crate (overkill if you ask me), or test with a `proc-macro`.
UI test cleanup: Extract lint from methods.rs test
Extracts the `result_map_unwrap_or_else` lint into a separate test file.
This also extracts the `IteratorFalsePositives` struct and impl into
`auxiliary/option_helpers.rs`.
cc #2038
Integrate rustfix into Clippy test suite
Once the [PR to compiletest-rs](https://github.com/laumann/compiletest-rs/pull/151) is reviewed and merged this fixes#2376.
I will create a separate tracking issue for adding `run-rustfix` to all tests.
deps: bump rustc_tools_util version from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 just in case...
I'm surprised there is no warning since the root cargo.toml specifies 0.1.0 but the subcrate toml actually states 0.1.1.
I should have noticed this in previous pull request but oh well...
Only trigger `infinite_iter` lint for infinitely allocating `collect()` calls
Fixes #3538
~Oh, I guess this should actually check other methods like `count` as well, not only `collect()`.~
Never mind, `collect` is the only of these functions that allocates a data structure.
Fix if_same_then_else false positive
This fixes false positive in #3559.
The problem was that `SpanlessEq` does not check patterns in declarations. So this two blocks considered equal.
```rust
if true {
let (x, y) = foo();
} else {
let (y, x) = foo();
}
```
Not sure if the proposed change is safe as `SpanlessEq` is used extensively in other lints, but I tried hard to come up with counterexample and failed.
