Implement `manual_clamp` lint
Fixes#9477Fixes#6751
Identifies common patterns where usage of the `clamp` function would be more succinct and clear, and suggests using the `clamp` function instead.
changelog: [`manual_clamp`]: Implement manual_clamp lint
fix [`needless_borrow`], [`explicit_auto_deref`] FPs on unions
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9383
changelog: fix [`needless_borrow`] false positive on unions
changelog: fix [`explicit_auto_deref`] false positive on unions
Left a couple debug derived impls on purpose I needed to debug as I don't think it's noise
Don't lint unstable moves in `std_instead_of_core`
Fixes#9515
changelog: [`std_instead_of_core`]: No longer suggests unstable modules such as `core::error`
add `box-default` lint
This adds a `box-default` lint to suggest using `Box::default()` instead of `Box::new(Default::default())`, which offers less moving parts and potentially better performance according to [the perf book](https://nnethercote.github.io/perf-book/standard-library-types.html#box).
---
changelog: add [`box_default`] lint
[`needless_return`] Recursively remove unneeded semicolons
fix#8336,
fix#8156,
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/7358,
fix#9192,
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9503
changelog: [`needless_return`] Recursively remove unneeded semicolons
For now the suggestion about removing the semicolons are hidden because they would be very noisy and should be obvious if the user wants to apply the lint manually instead of using `--fix`. This could be an issue for beginner, but haven't found better way to display it.
[arithmetic-side-effects] Consider references
Takes into consideration integer references like `&i32::MAX` because currently things like `let _ = &1 + 0` trigger the lint.
changelog: FP: [`arithmetic_side_effects`]: Now ignores references
[9507](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9507)
Don't lint `*_interior_mutable_const` on unions due to potential ICE.
fixes#9445
cc rust-lang/rust#101113
This started ICE'ing sometime last month due to stricter UB checks. I'm not sure how we could check the value of a union as MIRI doesn't seem to store which field is currently active.
changelog: Don't ICE on const unions containing a `!Freeze` type.
Silence [`question_mark`] in const context
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9175
When `const_try` is stabilised can be turned into a MSRV
changelog: Silence [`question_mark`] in const context
Implement https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8368 - a new
lint to inline format arguments such as `print!("{}", var)` into
`print!("{var}")`.
code | suggestion | comment
---|---|---
`print!("{}", var)` | `print!("{var}")` | simple variables
`print!("{0}", var)` | `print!("{var}")` | positional variables
`print!("{v}", v=var)` | `print!("{var}")` | named variables
`print!("{0} {0}", var)` | `print!("{var} {var}")` | aliased variables
`print!("{0:1$}", var, width)` | `print!("{var:width$}")` | width
support
`print!("{0:.1$}", var, prec)` | `print!("{var:.prec$}")` | precision
support
`print!("{:.*}", prec, var)` | `print!("{var:.prec$}")` | asterisk
support
code | suggestion | comment
---|---|---
`print!("{0}={1}", var, 1+2)` | `print!("{var}={0}", 1+2)` | Format
string uses an indexed argument that cannot be inlined. Supporting this
case requires re-indexing of the format string.
changelog: [`uninlined_format_args`]: A new lint to inline format
arguments, i.e. `print!("{}", var)` into `print!("{var}")`
fix a ui test
use `into`
fix clippy ui test
fix a run-make-fulldeps test
implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`
use `OwnerId` for more queries
change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
[`never_loop`]: Fix FP with let..else statements.
Fixes#9356
This has been bugging me for a while, so I thought I'd take a stab at it! I'm completely uncertain about the quality of my code, but I think it's an alright start, so opening this PR to get some feedback from more experienced clippy people :)
changelog: [`never_loop`]: Fix FP with let..else statements
Introduce mir::Unevaluated
Previously the distinction between unevaluated constants in the type-system and in mir was not explicit and a little confusing. Probably better to introduce its own type for that.
r? `@lcnr`
