Implement `for<>` lifetime binder for closures
This PR implements RFC 3216 ([TI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97362)) and allows code like the following:
```rust
let _f = for<'a, 'b> |a: &'a A, b: &'b B| -> &'b C { b.c(a) };
// ^^^^^^^^^^^--- new!
```
cc ``@Aaron1011`` ``@cjgillot``
Always create elided lifetime parameters for functions
Anonymous and elided lifetimes in functions are sometimes (async fns) --and sometimes not (regular fns)-- desugared to implicit generic parameters.
This difference of treatment makes it some downstream analyses more complicated to handle. This step is a pre-requisite to perform lifetime elision resolution on AST.
There is currently an inconsistency in the treatment of argument-position impl-trait for functions and async fns:
```rust
trait Foo<'a> {}
fn foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ OK
fn bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ OK
```
The current implementation reports "missing lifetime specifier" on `foo`, but **accepts it** in `async_foo`.
This PR **proposes to accept** the anonymous lifetime in both cases as an extra generic lifetime parameter.
This change would be insta-stable, so let's ping t-lang.
Anonymous lifetimes in GAT bindings keep being forbidden:
```rust
fn foo(t: impl Foo<Assoc<'_> = Bar<'_>>) {}
^^ ^^
forbidden ok
```
I started a discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Anonymous.20lifetimes.20in.20universal.20impl-trait/near/284968606
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Pull Derefer before ElaborateDrops
_Follow up work to #97025#96549#96116#95887 #95649_
This moves `Derefer` before `ElaborateDrops` and creates a new `Rvalue` called `VirtualRef` that allows us to bypass many constraints for `DerefTemp`.
r? `@oli-obk`
Lower let-else in MIR
This MR will switch to lower let-else statements in MIR building instead.
To lower let-else in MIR, we build a mini-switch two branches. One branch leads to the matching case, and the other leads to the `else` block. This arrangement will allow temporary lifetime analysis running as-is so that the temporaries are properly extended according to the same rule applied to regular `let` statements.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335Fix#98672
Build the Clippy book as part of x.py doc
r? ``@ehuss`` since you said you would be interested in helping moving this forward.
cc ``@jyn514`` as part of the bootstrap team.
Add test for and fix rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131
This lint seems to have been broken by #98446 -- but of course, there was no clippy test for this case at the time.
`expr.span.ctxt().outer_expn_data()` now has `MacroKind::Derive` instead of `MacroKind::Attr` for something like:
```
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct UnderscoreInStruct {
_foo: u32,
}
```
---
changelog: none
closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9131
Make MIR basic blocks field public
This makes it possible to mutably borrow different fields of the MIR
body without resorting to methods like `basic_blocks_local_decls_mut_and_var_debug_info`.
To preserve validity of control flow graph caches in the presence of
modifications, a new struct `BasicBlocks` wraps together basic blocks
and control flow graph caches.
The `BasicBlocks` dereferences to `IndexVec<BasicBlock, BasicBlockData>`.
On the other hand a mutable access requires explicit `as_mut()` call.
Finishing touches for `#[expect]` (RFC 2383)
This PR adds documentation and some functionality to rustc's lint passes, to manually fulfill expectations. This is needed for some lints in Clippy. Hopefully, it should be one of the last things before we can move forward with stabilizing this feature.
As part of this PR, I've also updated `clippy::duplicate_mod` to showcase how this new functionality can be used and to ensure that it works correctly.
---
changelog: [`duplicate_mod`]: Fixed lint attribute interaction
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97660, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
And I guess that's it. Here have a magical unicorn 🦄
once cell renamings
This PR does the renamings proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74465#issuecomment-1153703128
- Move/rename `lazy::{OnceCell, Lazy}` to `cell::{OnceCell, LazyCell}`
- Move/rename `lazy::{SyncOnceCell, SyncLazy}` to `sync::{OnceLock, LazyLock}`
(I used `Lazy...` instead of `...Lazy` as it seems to be more consistent, easier to pronounce, etc)
```@rustbot``` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
