Add missing arguments to `new_lint` example of `cargo` lints
changelog: Add missing arguments to `new_lint` code example.
From the surrounding text, it seems like this code example is missing the arguments to create a new `cargo` lint.
Render missing generics suggestion verbosely
It's a bit easier to read like this, especially ones that are appending new generics onto an existing list, like ": `, T`" which render somewhat poorly inline.
Also don't suggest `dyn` as a type parameter to add, even if technically that's valid in edition 2015.
Don't pass `--sysroot` twice if SYSROOT is set
This is useful for rust-lang/rust to allow setting a sysroot that's *only* for build scripts, different from the regular sysroot passed in RUSTFLAGS (since cargo doesn't apply RUSTFLAGS to build scripts or proc-macros).
That said, the exact motivation is not particularly important: this fixes a regression from
5907e9155e (r1060215684).
Note that only RUSTFLAGS is tested in the new integration test; passing --sysroot through `clippy-driver` never worked as far as I can tell, and no one is using it, so I didn't fix it here.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106394.
---
changelog: other: `SYSROOT` and `--sysroot` can now be set at the same time
[#10149](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10149)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Whne SYSROOT is defined, clippy-driver will insert a --sysroot argument
when calling rustc. However, when a sysroot argument is already defined,
e.g. through RUSTFLAGS=--sysroot=... the `cargo clippy` call would
error. This tests that the sysroot argument is only passed once and that
SYSROOT is ignored in this case.
This is useful for rust-lang/rust to allow setting a sysroot that's
*only* for build scripts, different from the regular sysroot passed in
RUSTFLAGS (since cargo doesn't apply RUSTFLAGS to build scripts or
proc-macros).
That said, the exact motivation is not particularly important: this
fixes a regression from
5907e9155e (r1060215684).
Note that only RUSTFLAGS is tested in the new integration test; passing
--sysroot through `clippy-driver` never worked as far as I can tell, and
no one is using it, so I didn't fix it here.
Allow implementing `Hash` with derived `PartialEq` (`derive_hash_xor_eq`
This is a common pattern and is totally allowed by the `Hash` trait.
Fixes#2627
changelog: Move: Renamed `derive_hash_xor_eq` to [`derived_hash_with_manual_eq`]
[#10184](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10184)
changelog: Enhancement: [`derived_hash_with_manual_eq`]: Now allows `#[derive(PartialEq)]` with custom `Hash` implementations
[#10184](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10184)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
trim paths in `suspicious_to_owned`
This continues my path trimming spree. I'm not going to add yet another changelog entry, we should have one "trim paths in some applicable lints" entry instead.
---
changelog: none
expl_impl_clone_on_copy: ignore packed structs with type/const params
changelog: [`expl_impl_clone_on_copy`]: Ignore `#[repr(packed)]` structs with type or const paramaters
Fixes#10188
A more involved solution that checks if any bound on the trait impl aren't present on the struct definition would be ideal, but I couldn't see a nice way to go about that
unused_self: Don't trigger if the method body contains todo!()
If the author is using todo!(), presumably they intend to use self at some point later, so we don't have a good basis to recommend factoring out to an associated function.
Fixes#10117.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`unused_self`]: No longer lints, if the method body contains a `todo!()` call
[#10166](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10166)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
