16 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Catherine Flores	4d49065a6c	Suppress question_mark if question_mark_used is not allowed	2023-08-02 14:13:16 -05:00
y21	70610c0018	lint in nested bodies if try is in outer body	2023-06-28 12:41:18 +02:00
y21	716305d4b6	[question_mark]: don't lint inside of try block	2023-06-21 16:39:46 +02:00
Oli Scherer	def1705a27	Update to a compiletest-rs version that requires //@ for commands	2023-04-20 14:44:03 +00:00
Elliot Bobrow	98250af4a3	question_mark don't lint on if let Err with else	2022-10-25 21:16:28 -07:00
kraktus	3ca6b9d031	Silence [question_mark] in const context	2022-09-16 22:02:09 +02:00
Lukas Lueg	e87a5a1cc5	Dont lint on match pattern-binding ... Fixes #9347 Technically it is possible to have a blank match-pattern that does nothing, and we fail to lint. But its easier to be safe than sorry here.	2022-08-18 19:30:56 +02:00
bors	d0b8f7508c	Simplify if let statements ... fixes: #8288 --- changelog: Allowing [`qustion_mark`] lint to check `if let` expressions that immediatly return unwrapped value	2022-07-08 16:12:00 +00:00
dswij	01ca66cbd7	Fix FP on question_mark if returned object is not local	2021-12-06 17:51:00 +08:00
dswij	2fd168285a	Update question_mark test to behave better	2021-10-26 21:21:46 +08:00
dswij	a91ec59460	Update question_mark expected test output	2021-10-26 21:21:46 +08:00
dswij	3fc99b6a33	Update test for question_mark to cover Result	2021-10-19 18:50:49 +08:00
Hirochika Matsumoto	c7445d7f2c	Pluralize lint name	2020-11-18 01:28:37 +09:00
Hirochika Matsumoto	30632fb8e6	Allow this lint on lint tests	2020-11-18 01:28:37 +09:00
Shotaro Yamada	f58bb5b234	question_mark: don't add as_ref() for a call expression	2020-04-17 13:09:02 +09:00
Shotaro Yamada	246709f89e	run-rustfix	2020-03-04 17:37:01 +09:00