Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
useless use of format! should return function directly
fixes#7066
changelog: [`useless_format`] wraps the content in the braces when it's needed.
r? `@giraffate`
Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
fixes: #3864
Indentation checks could be added as well, but the lint already doesn't check for it.
changelog: Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
Fixing FPs for the `branches_sharing_code` lint
Fixes#7053Fixes#7054
And an additional CSS adjustment to support dark mode for every inline code. It currently only works in paragraphs, which was an oversight on my part 😅. [Current Example](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#blacklisted_name)
This also includes ~50 lines of doc comments and is therefor not as big as the changes would indicate. 🐧
---
changelog: none
All of these bugs were introduced in this dev version and are therefor not worth a change log entry.
r? `@phansch`
cc: `@camsteffen` since you have a pretty good overview of the `SpanlessEq` implementation 🙃
Add `cloned_instead_of_copied` lint
Don't go cloning all willy-nilly.
Featuring a new `get_iterator_item_ty` util!
changelog: Add cloned_instead_of_copied lint
Closes#3870
Fix: redundant_pattern_matching drop order
Fixes#5746
A note about the change in drop order is added when the scrutinee (or any temporary in the expression) isn't known to be safe to drop in any order (i.e. doesn't implement the `Drop` trait, or contain such a type). There is a whitelist for some `std` types, but it's incomplete. Currently just `Vec<_>`, `Box<_>`, `Rc<_>` and `Arc<_>`, but only if the contained type is also safe to drop in any order.
Another lint for when the drop order changes could be added as allowed by default, but the drop order requirement is pretty subtle in this case. I think the note added to the lint should be enough to make someone think before applying the change.
changelog: Added a note to `redundant_pattern_matching` when the change in drop order might matter
Improve `map_entry` suggestion
fixes: #5176fixes: #4674fixes: #4664fixes: #1450
Still need to handle the value returned by `insert` correctly.
changelog: Improve `map_entry` suggestion. Will now suggest `or_insert`, `insert_with` or `match _.entry(_)` as appopriate.
changelog: Fix `map_entry` false positives where the entry api can't be used. e.g. when the map is used for multiple things.
Don't allow adjustments for `manual_map`
fixes: #7077
The other option here would be to add the return type to the closure. It would be fine for simple types, but longer types can be rather unwieldy. Could also implement the adjustment manually.
changelog: Don't lint `manual_map` when type adjustments are added. e.g. autoderef
Remove `match_path` and `match_qpath`
The only remaining usage is the `author` lint, so the functions are left in for now. The test result for `repl_uninit` changed, the lint was broken before.
The `collapsible_span_lint_calls` and `match_type_on_diag_item` tests have been changed. Both lints were broken when utils was extracted into it's own crate. `match_type_on_diag_item` isn't quite fixed, but it's at least less broken.
changelog: None
Fix false positives where the map is used before inserting into the map.
Fix false positives where two insertions happen.
Suggest using `if let Entry::Vacant(e) = _.entry(_)` when `or_insert` might be a semantic change
tabs_in_doc_comments: Fix ICE due to char indexing
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output. But I don't think we handle those cases
anywhere in Clippy currently?
Fixes#5835
changelog: Fix ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`
Fix a FP in `missing_const_for_fn`
where a function that calls a standard library function whose constness
is unstable is considered as being able to be a const function. Fixes#5995.
The core change is the move from `rustc_mir::const_eval::is_min_const_fn` to `rustc_mir::const_eval::is_const_fn`. I'm not clear about the difference in their purpose between them so I'm not sure if it's acceptable to call `qualify_min_const_fn::is_min_const_fn` this way now.
---
changelog: `missing_const_for_fn`: No longer lints when an unstably const function is called
Fix FP in `wrong_self_convention` lint
Previously, this lint didn't check into impl block when it was implementing a trait.
Recent improvements (#6924) have moved this check and some impl blocks are now checked but they shouldn't, such as in #7032.
Fixes#7032
changelog: Fix FP when not taking `self` in impl block for `wrong_self_convention` lint
Add a note on the issue #5953
Hello,
I thought it would be better to have a note and warning about this issue considering it introduced an UB in the past even with the "Search on Github" feature.
---
changelog: Add a note on the issue #5953 to the known problems section.
Deprecate `filter_map`
Since #6591, `filter_map` does not even lint `filter().map()`. The cases that are still linted make no sense IMO. So this just removes/deprecates it.
changelog: Deprecate `filter_map` lint
Closes#3424Fixes#7050
Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint
Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint when the import is reused with `self`, like in `use self::module`.
Fixes#5210
changelog: none
Invalid null usage v2
This is continuation of #6192 after inactivity.
I plan to move paths into the compiler as diagnostic items after this is merged.
fixes#1703
changelog: none
consider mutability on useless_vec suggestions
fixes#7035
changelog: Now the suggested by `useless_vec` considers mutability to suggest either `&[]`, as before, or `&mut []` if the used reference is mutable.
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output.
Don't trigger `same_item_push` if the vec is used in the loop body
fixes#6987
changelog: `same_item_push`: Don't trigger if the `vec` is used in the loop body
fix `missing_panics_doc` not detecting `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
fixes#6997
changelog: `missing_panics_doc` detects `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
---
searching for `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` in `FindPanicUnwrap`
New Lint: `branches_sharing_code`
This lint checks if all `if`-blocks contain some statements that are the same and can be moved out of the blocks to prevent code duplication. Here is an example:
```rust
let _ = if ... {
println!("Start"); // <-- Lint for code duplication
let _a = 99;
println!("End"); // <-- Lint for code duplication
false
} else {
println!("Start");
let _b = 17;
println!("End");
false
};
```
This could be written as:
```rust
println!("Start");
let _ = if ... {
let _a = 99;
false
} else {
let _b = 17;
false
};
println!("End");
```
---
This lint will get masked by the `IF_SAME_THEN_ELSE` lint. I think it makes more sense to only emit one lint per if block. This means that the folloing example:
```rust
if ... {
let _a = 17;
} else {
let _a = 17;
}
```
Will only trigger the `IF_SAME_THEN_ELSE` lint and not the `SHARED_CODE_IN_IF_BLOCKS` lint.
---
closes: #5234
changelog: Added a new lint: `branches_sharing_code`
And hello to the one that is writing the changelog for this release :D
Remove author requirement for `cargo_common_metadata`
This PR follows https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/9282, I'm not fully informed about all of this, it would be great if somebody knowledgeable about this topic agrees.
changelog: Changed `cargo_common_metadata` to stop linting on the optional author field.
* Added expression check for shared_code_in_if_blocks
* Finishing touches for the shared_code_in_if_blocks lint
* Applying PR suggestions
* Update lints yay
* Moved test into subfolder
Fix `redundant_clone` fp
fixes: #5973fixes: #5595fixes: #6998
changelog: Fix `redundant_clone` fp where the cloned value is modified while the clone is in use.
Lint: filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
Fixes#6061
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog:
* add new lint for filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
First Rust PR, so I'm sure I've violated some idioms. Happy to change anything.
I'm getting one test failure locally -- a stderr diff for `compile_test`. I'm having a hard time seeing how I could be causing it, so I'm tentatively opening this in the hopes that it's an artifact of my local setup against `rustc`. Hoping it can at least still be reviewed in the meantime.
I'm gathering that since this is a method lint, and `.filter(...).map(...)` is already checked, the means of implementation needs to be a little different, so I didn't exactly follow the setup boilerplate. My way of checking for method calls seems a little too direct (ie, "is the second element of the expression literally the path for `Option::is_some`?"), but it seems like that's how some other lints work, so I went with it. I'm assuming we're not concerned about, eg, closures that just end up equivalent to `Option::is_some` by eta reduction.
disable upper_case_acronyms for pub items - enum edition
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6803 (again... 😅 )
My previous fix did not work for enums because enum variants were checked separately in the `check_variant` function but it looks like we can't use that because we can't tell if the enum the variants belong to is declared as public or not (it always said `Inherited` for me)
I went and special-cased enums and iterated over all the variants "manually", but only, if the enums is not public.
---
changelog: fix upper_case_acronyms still firing on public enums (#6803)
Refactor types
r? `@flip1995`
This is the last PR to close#6724🎉
Also, this fixes#6936.
changelog: `vec_box`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
changelog: `linkedlist`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
changelog: `option_option`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
Improve `clone_on_copy`
This also removes the `clone_on_copy_mut` test as the same thing is covered in the `clone_on_copy` test.
changelog: `copy_on_clone` lint on chained method calls taking self by value
changelog: `copy_on_clone` only lint when using the `Clone` trait
changelog: `copy_on_clone` correct suggestion when the cloned value is a macro call.
Lint on `_.clone().method()` when method takes self by value
Set applicability correctly
Correct suggestion when the cloned value is a macro call. e.g. `m!(x).clone()`
Don't lint when not using the `Clone` trait
Improve `expl_impl_clone_on_copy`
fixes: #1254
changelog: Check to see if the generic constraints are the same as if using derive for `expl_impl_clone_on_copy`
Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer.
Dubious changes:
- Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting
x87 support.
- Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone
wants to use it in the future?
- Don't change rustc_serialize
I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the
tests needed more work than I expected.
TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.
`len_without_is_empty` improvements
fixes: #6958fixes: #6972
changelog: Check the return type of `len`. Only integral types, or an `Option` or `Result` wrapping one.
changelog: Ensure the return type of `is_empty` matches. e.g. `Option<usize>` -> `Option<bool>`
Check the return type of `len`. Only integral types, or an `Option` or `Result` wrapping one.
Ensure the return type of `is_empty` matches. e.g. `Option<usize>` -> `Option<bool>`
Fix bad suggestion when a reborrow might be required
Fix bad suggestion when the value being sliced is a macro call
Don't lint inside of a macro due to the previous context sensitive changes
Ignore str::len() in or_fun_call lint.
changelog: Changed `or_fun_call` to ignore `str::len`, in the same way it ignores `slice::len` and `array::len`
Closes#6943
Refactor lints in methods module
This PR refactors methods lints other than the lints I refactored in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/6826 and moves some functions to methods/utils.rs.
Basically, I follow the instruction described in #6680.
**For ease of review, I refactored step by step, keeping each commit small.**
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6886
cc: `@phansch,` `@flip1995,` `@Y-Nak`
changelog: Move lints in methods module to their own modules and some function to methods/utils.rs.
search_is_some: add checking for `is_none()`
fixes: #6815
changelog: search_is_some: add checking for `is_none()`.
To be honest I don't know what is the process of renaming the lints. Appreciate any feedback if that needs to be handled differently. Thanks!
Fix bad suggestion for `match_single_binding` lint
Fix a bad suggestion that needs curly braces when the target `match` is the body of an arm.
Fixes#6572
changelog: none
`match_wildcard` improvements
fixes: #6604fixes: #5733fixes: #6862#5733 is only fixed in the normal case, if different paths are used for the variants then the same problem will occur. It's cause by `def_path_str` returning an utterly useless result. I haven't dug into why yet.
For #6604 there should be some discussion before accepting this. It's easy enough to change the message rather than disable the lint for `Option` and `Result`.
changelog: Attempt to find a common path prefix for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
changelog: Don't lint op `Option` and `Result` for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
changelog: Consider `or` patterns and `Self` prefix for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
