diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/redundant_field_names.rs b/clippy_lints/src/redundant_field_names.rs index 587454f64..885e1aa9f 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/redundant_field_names.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/redundant_field_names.rs @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ -use syntax::ast::Name; use rustc::lint::*; use rustc::hir::*; -use utils::{match_qpath, match_var, span_lint_and_sugg}; -use utils::paths; +use utils::{is_range_expression, match_var, span_lint_and_sugg}; /// **What it does:** Checks for fields in struct literals where shorthands /// could be used. @@ -42,7 +40,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for RedundantFieldNames { for field in fields { let name = field.name.node; - if is_range_struct_field(path, &name) { + // Do not care about range expressions. + // They could have redundant field name when desugared to structs. + // e.g. `start..end` is desugared to `Range { start: start, end: end }` + if is_range_expression(expr.span) { continue; } @@ -60,27 +61,3 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for RedundantFieldNames { } } } - -/// ```rust -/// let start = 0; -/// let _ = start..; -/// -/// let end = 0; -/// let _ = ..end; -/// -/// let _ = start..end; -/// ``` -fn is_range_struct_field(path: &QPath, name: &Name) -> bool { - match name.as_str().as_ref() { - "start" => { - match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_STD) || match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_FROM_STD) - || match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_INCLUSIVE_STD) - }, - "end" => { - match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_STD) || match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_TO_STD) - || match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_INCLUSIVE_STD) - || match_qpath(path, &paths::RANGE_TO_INCLUSIVE_STD) - }, - _ => false, - } -} diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/utils/mod.rs b/clippy_lints/src/utils/mod.rs index c501dadeb..2f2f0c040 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/utils/mod.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/utils/mod.rs @@ -64,6 +64,16 @@ pub fn in_macro(span: Span) -> bool { }) } +/// Returns true if `expn_info` was expanded by range expressions. +pub fn is_range_expression(span: Span) -> bool { + span.ctxt().outer().expn_info().map_or(false, |info| { + match info.callee.format { + ExpnFormat::CompilerDesugaring(CompilerDesugaringKind::DotFill) => true, + _ => false, + } + }) +} + /// Returns true if the macro that expanded the crate was outside of the /// current crate or was a /// compiler plugin. diff --git a/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.rs b/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.rs index 8a17ab0c9..cb4928301 100644 --- a/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.rs +++ b/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.rs @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ #![warn(redundant_field_names)] #![allow(unused_variables)] -#![feature(inclusive_range,inclusive_range_syntax)] +#![feature(inclusive_range, inclusive_range_syntax)] + +use std::ops::{Range, RangeFrom, RangeTo, RangeInclusive, RangeToInclusive}; mod foo { pub const BAR: u8 = 0; @@ -29,7 +31,7 @@ fn main() { foo: foo::BAR, //should be ok }; - // Range syntax + // Range expressions let (start, end) = (0, 0); let _ = start..; @@ -39,10 +41,10 @@ fn main() { let _ = ..=end; let _ = start..=end; - // TODO: the following should be linted - let _ = ::std::ops::RangeFrom { start: start }; - let _ = ::std::ops::RangeTo { end: end }; - let _ = ::std::ops::Range { start: start, end: end }; - let _ = ::std::ops::RangeInclusive { start: start, end: end }; - let _ = ::std::ops::RangeToInclusive { end: end }; + // hand-written Range family structs are linted + let _ = RangeFrom { start: start }; + let _ = RangeTo { end: end }; + let _ = Range { start: start, end: end }; + let _ = RangeInclusive { start: start, end: end }; + let _ = RangeToInclusive { end: end }; } diff --git a/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.stderr b/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.stderr index 443f30a9f..40315c6ff 100644 --- a/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,58 @@ error: redundant field names in struct initialization - --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:24:9 + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:26:9 | -24 | gender: gender, +26 | gender: gender, | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `gender` | = note: `-D redundant-field-names` implied by `-D warnings` error: redundant field names in struct initialization - --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:25:9 + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:27:9 | -25 | age: age, +27 | age: age, | ^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `age` -error: aborting due to 2 previous errors +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:45:25 + | +45 | let _ = RangeFrom { start: start }; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `start` + +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:46:23 + | +46 | let _ = RangeTo { end: end }; + | ^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `end` + +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:47:21 + | +47 | let _ = Range { start: start, end: end }; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `start` + +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:47:35 + | +47 | let _ = Range { start: start, end: end }; + | ^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `end` + +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:48:30 + | +48 | let _ = RangeInclusive { start: start, end: end }; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `start` + +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:48:44 + | +48 | let _ = RangeInclusive { start: start, end: end }; + | ^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `end` + +error: redundant field names in struct initialization + --> $DIR/redundant_field_names.rs:49:32 + | +49 | let _ = RangeToInclusive { end: end }; + | ^^^^^^^^ help: replace it with: `end` + +error: aborting due to 9 previous errors