mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
synced 2024-11-23 21:23:56 +00:00
Auto merge of #7770 - zvavybir:master, r=xFrednet
improved help message for `suspicious_map` `suspicious_map`'s help message assumes that the literal behavior is never the intended one, although it's sometimes. This PR adds a mention of `inspect`, offering a idiomatic alternative. fixes #7767 --- changelog: Improved help message of [`suspicious_map`].
This commit is contained in:
commit
b9dedf3959
3 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -1284,8 +1284,9 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||
/// It looks suspicious. Maybe `map` was confused with `filter`.
|
||||
/// If the `map` call is intentional, this should be rewritten. Or, if you intend to
|
||||
/// drive the iterator to completion, you can just use `for_each` instead.
|
||||
/// If the `map` call is intentional, this should be rewritten
|
||||
/// using `inspect`. Or, if you intend to drive the iterator to
|
||||
/// completion, you can just use `for_each` instead.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Example
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ pub fn check<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &hir::Expr<'_>, count_recv: &hi
|
|||
expr.span,
|
||||
"this call to `map()` won't have an effect on the call to `count()`",
|
||||
None,
|
||||
"make sure you did not confuse `map` with `filter` or `for_each`",
|
||||
"make sure you did not confuse `map` with `filter`, `for_each` or `inspect`",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ LL | let _ = (0..3).map(|x| x + 2).count();
|
|||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: `-D clippy::suspicious-map` implied by `-D warnings`
|
||||
= help: make sure you did not confuse `map` with `filter` or `for_each`
|
||||
= help: make sure you did not confuse `map` with `filter`, `for_each` or `inspect`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `map()` won't have an effect on the call to `count()`
|
||||
--> $DIR/suspicious_map.rs:7:13
|
||||
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ error: this call to `map()` won't have an effect on the call to `count()`
|
|||
LL | let _ = (0..3).map(f).count();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: make sure you did not confuse `map` with `filter` or `for_each`
|
||||
= help: make sure you did not confuse `map` with `filter`, `for_each` or `inspect`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue