diff --git a/clippy_dev/src/lib.rs b/clippy_dev/src/lib.rs index 626afceec..60f1a3df5 100644 --- a/clippy_dev/src/lib.rs +++ b/clippy_dev/src/lib.rs @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ fn test_gen_deprecated() { "should_assert_eq", "group1", "abc", - Some("has been superseeded by should_assert_eq2"), + Some("has been superseded by should_assert_eq2"), "module_name", ), Lint::new( @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ fn test_gen_deprecated() { let expected: Vec = vec![ " store.register_removed(", " \"should_assert_eq\",", - " \"has been superseeded by should_assert_eq2\",", + " \"has been superseded by should_assert_eq2\",", " );", " store.register_removed(", " \"another_deprecated\",", diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/double_comparison.rs b/clippy_lints/src/double_comparison.rs index 25ce883ca..89440845e 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/double_comparison.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/double_comparison.rs @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ use crate::syntax::source_map::Span; use crate::utils::{snippet_with_applicability, span_lint_and_sugg, SpanlessEq}; -/// **What it does:** Checks for double comparions that could be simpified to a single expression. +/// **What it does:** Checks for double comparions that could be simplified to a single expression. /// /// /// **Why is this bad?** Readability. diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/write.rs b/clippy_lints/src/write.rs index 416ba4ca1..209706329 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/write.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/write.rs @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ impl EarlyLintPass for Pass { } /// Checks the arguments of `print[ln]!` and `write[ln]!` calls. It will return a tuple of two -/// options. The first part of the tuple is `format_str` of the macros. The secund part of the tuple +/// options. The first part of the tuple is `format_str` of the macros. The second part of the tuple /// is in the `write[ln]!` case the expression the `format_str` should be written to. /// /// Example: