mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy
synced 2024-11-27 23:20:39 +00:00
Auto merge of #11146 - hydro-project:tuple-array-conversions, r=Centri3,xFrednet
[`tuple_array_conversions`]: move from `complexity` to `nursery` The lint suggestion is arguably often less readable and more complex than the original code. For example, which of the following is the most readable: ```rust let _vertices = edges.flat_map(|(src, dst)| [src, dst]); let _vertices = edges.flat_map(<_ as Into<[i32; 2]>>::into); let _vertices = edges.flat_map(<[i32; 2]>::from); ``` The lint can be useful, but really only applies if the tuple is either long enough that naming the fields is silly (maybe at least 4 entries long), or if the author intends the fields to be homogenous, which is author intent and can't be determined by the lint. Therefore I think the lint should be marked as pedantic. Currently, there are also a lot of false positives with the lint: * https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11082 * https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11085 * https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11100 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11105) * https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11124 * https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11144 Should fix those issues before enabling it for everyone. --- changelog: Move [`tuple_array_conversions`] to `nursery` (Now allow-by-default) <!-- FIY: Ignore this change, if the commit gets backported --> [#11146](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11146)
This commit is contained in:
commit
631faa1bc7
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||||
/// Checks for tuple<=>array conversions that are not done with `.into()`.
|
/// Checks for tuple<=>array conversions that are not done with `.into()`.
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||||
/// It's unnecessary complexity. `.into()` works for tuples<=>arrays at or below 12 elements and
|
/// It may be unnecessary complexity. `.into()` works for converting tuples
|
||||||
/// conveys the intent a lot better, while also leaving less room for hard to spot bugs!
|
/// <=> arrays of up to 12 elements and may convey intent more clearly.
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// ### Example
|
/// ### Example
|
||||||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||||||
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||||
/// ```
|
/// ```
|
||||||
#[clippy::version = "1.72.0"]
|
#[clippy::version = "1.72.0"]
|
||||||
pub TUPLE_ARRAY_CONVERSIONS,
|
pub TUPLE_ARRAY_CONVERSIONS,
|
||||||
complexity,
|
pedantic,
|
||||||
"checks for tuple<=>array conversions that are not done with `.into()`"
|
"checks for tuple<=>array conversions that are not done with `.into()`"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
impl_lint_pass!(TupleArrayConversions => [TUPLE_ARRAY_CONVERSIONS]);
|
impl_lint_pass!(TupleArrayConversions => [TUPLE_ARRAY_CONVERSIONS]);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue