Improve doc for can_move_expr_to_closure_no_visit

This commit is contained in:
Jason Newcomb 2021-08-09 16:26:27 -04:00
parent 9500974bdb
commit 5e4d8b44f9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DA59E8643A37ED06

View file

@ -631,20 +631,45 @@ pub fn can_mut_borrow_both(cx: &LateContext<'_>, e1: &Expr<'_>, e2: &Expr<'_>) -
/// Checks if the top level expression can be moved into a closure as is.
/// Currently checks for:
/// * Break/Continue outside the given jump targets
/// * Break/Continue outside the given loop HIR ids.
/// * Yield/Return statments.
/// * Inline assembly
/// * Inline assembly.
/// * Usages of a field of a local where the type of the local can be partially moved.
///
/// For example, given the following function:
///
/// ```
/// fn f<'a>(iter: &mut impl Iterator<Item = (usize, &'a mut String)>) {
/// for item in iter {
/// let s = item.1;
/// if item.0 > 10 {
/// continue;
/// } else {
/// s.clear();
/// }
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// When called on the expression `item.0` this will return false unless the local `item` is in the
/// `ignore_locals` set. The type `(usize, &mut String)` can have the second element moved, so it
/// isn't always safe to move into a closure when only a single field is needed.
///
/// When called on the `continue` expression this will return false unless the outer loop expression
/// is in the `loop_ids` set.
///
/// Note that this check is not recursive, so passing the `if` expression will always return true
/// even though sub-expressions might return false.
pub fn can_move_expr_to_closure_no_visit(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
jump_targets: &[HirId],
loop_ids: &[HirId],
ignore_locals: &HirIdSet,
) -> bool {
match expr.kind {
ExprKind::Break(Destination { target_id: Ok(id), .. }, _)
| ExprKind::Continue(Destination { target_id: Ok(id), .. })
if jump_targets.contains(&id) =>
if loop_ids.contains(&id) =>
{
true
},