Adding configuration to allow safety comment above stmt containing unsafe block

This commit is contained in:
Renato Lochetti 2023-06-04 13:11:50 +01:00
parent 965f4a8492
commit 520228b377
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: FB2DDFF8C164FA5E
9 changed files with 93 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -695,3 +695,13 @@ Minimum chars an ident can have, anything below or equal to this will be linted.
* [`min_ident_chars`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#min_ident_chars) * [`min_ident_chars`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#min_ident_chars)
## `accept-comment-above-statement`
Whether to accept a safety comment to be placed above the statement containing the `usafe` block
**Default Value:** `false` (`bool`)
---
**Affected lints:**
* [`undocumented_unsafe_blocks`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#undocumented_unsafe_blocks)

View file

@ -929,7 +929,12 @@ pub fn register_plugins(store: &mut rustc_lint::LintStore, sess: &Session, conf:
enable_raw_pointer_heuristic_for_send, enable_raw_pointer_heuristic_for_send,
)) ))
}); });
store.register_late_pass(move |_| Box::new(undocumented_unsafe_blocks::UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks)); let accept_comment_above_statement = conf.accept_comment_above_statement;
store.register_late_pass(move |_| {
Box::new(undocumented_unsafe_blocks::UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks::new(
accept_comment_above_statement,
))
});
let allow_mixed_uninlined = conf.allow_mixed_uninlined_format_args; let allow_mixed_uninlined = conf.allow_mixed_uninlined_format_args;
store.register_late_pass(move |_| Box::new(format_args::FormatArgs::new(msrv(), allow_mixed_uninlined))); store.register_late_pass(move |_| Box::new(format_args::FormatArgs::new(msrv(), allow_mixed_uninlined)));
store.register_late_pass(|_| Box::new(trailing_empty_array::TrailingEmptyArray)); store.register_late_pass(|_| Box::new(trailing_empty_array::TrailingEmptyArray));

View file

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ use rustc_hir::{Block, BlockCheckMode, ItemKind, Node, UnsafeSource};
use rustc_lexer::{tokenize, TokenKind}; use rustc_lexer::{tokenize, TokenKind};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext}; use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext};
use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro; use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; use rustc_session::{declare_tool_lint, impl_lint_pass};
use rustc_span::{BytePos, Pos, Span, SyntaxContext}; use rustc_span::{BytePos, Pos, Span, SyntaxContext};
declare_clippy_lint! { declare_clippy_lint! {
@ -92,7 +92,20 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
"annotating safe code with a safety comment" "annotating safe code with a safety comment"
} }
declare_lint_pass!(UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks => [UNDOCUMENTED_UNSAFE_BLOCKS, UNNECESSARY_SAFETY_COMMENT]); #[derive(Copy, Clone)]
pub struct UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks {
accept_comment_above_statement: bool,
}
impl UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks {
pub fn new(accept_comment_above_statement: bool) -> Self {
Self {
accept_comment_above_statement,
}
}
}
impl_lint_pass!(UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks => [UNDOCUMENTED_UNSAFE_BLOCKS, UNNECESSARY_SAFETY_COMMENT]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks { impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks {
fn check_block(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, block: &'tcx Block<'tcx>) { fn check_block(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, block: &'tcx Block<'tcx>) {
@ -101,7 +114,7 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for UndocumentedUnsafeBlocks {
&& !is_lint_allowed(cx, UNDOCUMENTED_UNSAFE_BLOCKS, block.hir_id) && !is_lint_allowed(cx, UNDOCUMENTED_UNSAFE_BLOCKS, block.hir_id)
&& !is_unsafe_from_proc_macro(cx, block.span) && !is_unsafe_from_proc_macro(cx, block.span)
&& !block_has_safety_comment(cx, block.span) && !block_has_safety_comment(cx, block.span)
&& !block_parents_have_safety_comment(cx, block.hir_id) && !block_parents_have_safety_comment(self.accept_comment_above_statement, cx, block.hir_id)
{ {
let source_map = cx.tcx.sess.source_map(); let source_map = cx.tcx.sess.source_map();
let span = if source_map.is_multiline(block.span) { let span = if source_map.is_multiline(block.span) {
@ -313,10 +326,31 @@ fn is_unsafe_from_proc_macro(cx: &LateContext<'_>, span: Span) -> bool {
// Checks if any parent {expression, statement, block, local, const, static} // Checks if any parent {expression, statement, block, local, const, static}
// has a safety comment // has a safety comment
fn block_parents_have_safety_comment(cx: &LateContext<'_>, id: hir::HirId) -> bool { fn block_parents_have_safety_comment(
accept_comment_above_statement: bool,
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
id: hir::HirId,
) -> bool {
if let Some(node) = get_parent_node(cx.tcx, id) { if let Some(node) = get_parent_node(cx.tcx, id) {
return match node { return match node {
Node::Expr(expr) => !is_branchy(expr) && span_in_body_has_safety_comment(cx, expr.span), Node::Expr(expr) => {
if let Some(
Node::Local(hir::Local { span, .. })
| Node::Item(hir::Item {
kind: hir::ItemKind::Const(..) | ItemKind::Static(..),
span,
..
}),
) = get_parent_node(cx.tcx, expr.hir_id)
{
// if unsafe block is part of a let/const/static statement,
// and accept_comment_above_statement is set to true
// we accept the safety comment in the line the precedes this statement.
accept_comment_above_statement && span_in_body_has_safety_comment(cx, *span)
} else {
!is_branchy(expr) && span_in_body_has_safety_comment(cx, expr.span)
}
},
Node::Stmt(hir::Stmt { Node::Stmt(hir::Stmt {
kind: kind:
hir::StmtKind::Local(hir::Local { span, .. }) hir::StmtKind::Local(hir::Local { span, .. })

View file

@ -538,6 +538,10 @@ define_Conf! {
/// ///
/// Minimum chars an ident can have, anything below or equal to this will be linted. /// Minimum chars an ident can have, anything below or equal to this will be linted.
(min_ident_chars_threshold: u64 = 1), (min_ident_chars_threshold: u64 = 1),
/// Lint: UNDOCUMENTED_UNSAFE_BLOCKS.
///
/// Whether to accept a safety comment to be placed above the statement containing the `usafe` block
(accept_comment_above_statement: bool = false),
} }
/// Search for the configuration file. /// Search for the configuration file.

View file

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
error: error reading Clippy's configuration file: unknown field `foobar`, expected one of error: error reading Clippy's configuration file: unknown field `foobar`, expected one of
accept-comment-above-statement
allow-dbg-in-tests allow-dbg-in-tests
allow-expect-in-tests allow-expect-in-tests
allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args
@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ LL | foobar = 42
| ^^^^^^ | ^^^^^^
error: error reading Clippy's configuration file: unknown field `barfoo`, expected one of error: error reading Clippy's configuration file: unknown field `barfoo`, expected one of
accept-comment-above-statement
allow-dbg-in-tests allow-dbg-in-tests
allow-expect-in-tests allow-expect-in-tests
allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args

View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
accept-comment-above-statement = true

View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
#![deny(clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks)]
#![allow(clippy::missing_safety_doc)]
fn main() {
// Safety: A safety comment
let _some_variable_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line =
unsafe { a_function_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line() };
}
pub unsafe fn a_function_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line() -> u32 {
1
}

View file

@ -509,4 +509,14 @@ fn issue_9142() {
}; };
} }
pub unsafe fn a_function_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line() -> u32 {
1
}
fn issue_10832() {
// Safety: A safety comment. But it will warn anyways
let _some_variable_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line =
unsafe { a_function_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line() };
}
fn main() {} fn main() {}

View file

@ -318,5 +318,13 @@ LL | let bar = unsafe {};
| |
= help: consider adding a safety comment on the preceding line = help: consider adding a safety comment on the preceding line
error: aborting due to 36 previous errors error: unsafe block missing a safety comment
--> $DIR/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs:519:9
|
LL | unsafe { a_function_with_a_very_long_name_to_break_the_line() };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: consider adding a safety comment on the preceding line
error: aborting due to 37 previous errors