rust-clippy/clippy_lints/src/ranges.rs

204 lines
7 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use rustc::lint::*;
use rustc::hir::*;
use syntax::ast::RangeLimits;
use syntax::codemap::Spanned;
2018-05-30 08:15:50 +00:00
use crate::utils::{is_integer_literal, paths, snippet, span_lint, span_lint_and_then};
use crate::utils::{get_trait_def_id, higher, implements_trait};
use crate::utils::sugg::Sugg;
/// **What it does:** Checks for calling `.step_by(0)` on iterators,
/// which never terminates.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** This very much looks like an oversight, since with
/// `loop { .. }` there is an obvious better way to endlessly loop.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
2016-07-15 22:25:44 +00:00
/// **Example:**
/// ```rust
/// for x in (5..5).step_by(0) { .. }
/// ```
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
pub ITERATOR_STEP_BY_ZERO,
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
correctness,
"using `Iterator::step_by(0)`, which produces an infinite iterator"
}
2017-08-09 07:30:56 +00:00
/// **What it does:** Checks for zipping a collection with the range of
/// `0.._.len()`.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** The code is better expressed with `.enumerate()`.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
2016-07-15 22:25:44 +00:00
/// **Example:**
/// ```rust
/// x.iter().zip(0..x.len())
/// ```
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
pub RANGE_ZIP_WITH_LEN,
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
complexity,
"zipping iterator with a range when `enumerate()` would do"
}
/// **What it does:** Checks for exclusive ranges where 1 is added to the
/// upper bound, e.g. `x..(y+1)`.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** The code is more readable with an inclusive range
/// like `x..=y`.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
/// ```rust
/// for x..(y+1) { .. }
/// ```
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
pub RANGE_PLUS_ONE,
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
nursery,
"`x..(y+1)` reads better as `x..=y`"
}
/// **What it does:** Checks for inclusive ranges where 1 is subtracted from
/// the upper bound, e.g. `x..=(y-1)`.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** The code is more readable with an exclusive range
/// like `x..y`.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
/// ```rust
/// for x..=(y-1) { .. }
/// ```
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
pub RANGE_MINUS_ONE,
2018-03-28 13:24:26 +00:00
style,
"`x..=(y-1)` reads better as `x..y`"
}
2017-08-09 07:30:56 +00:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
pub struct Pass;
impl LintPass for Pass {
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
2017-11-04 19:55:56 +00:00
lint_array!(ITERATOR_STEP_BY_ZERO, RANGE_ZIP_WITH_LEN, RANGE_PLUS_ONE, RANGE_MINUS_ONE)
}
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for Pass {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr) {
if let ExprMethodCall(ref path, _, ref args) = expr.node {
let name = path.name.as_str();
// Range with step_by(0).
if name == "step_by" && args.len() == 2 && has_step_by(cx, &args[0]) {
2018-05-30 08:15:50 +00:00
use crate::consts::{constant, Constant};
2018-05-13 11:16:31 +00:00
if let Some((Constant::Int(0), _)) = constant(cx, cx.tables, &args[1]) {
2018-03-13 10:38:11 +00:00
span_lint(
cx,
ITERATOR_STEP_BY_ZERO,
expr.span,
"Iterator::step_by(0) will panic at runtime",
);
}
} else if name == "zip" && args.len() == 2 {
let iter = &args[0].node;
let zip_arg = &args[1];
if_chain! {
2016-06-06 00:09:19 +00:00
// .iter() call
if let ExprMethodCall(ref iter_path, _, ref iter_args ) = *iter;
if iter_path.name == "iter";
2016-06-06 00:09:19 +00:00
// range expression in .zip() call: 0..x.len()
if let Some(higher::Range { start: Some(start), end: Some(end), .. }) = higher::range(cx, zip_arg);
if is_integer_literal(start, 0);
2016-06-06 00:09:19 +00:00
// .len() call
if let ExprMethodCall(ref len_path, _, ref len_args) = end.node;
if len_path.name == "len" && len_args.len() == 1;
2016-06-06 00:09:19 +00:00
// .iter() and .len() called on same Path
if let ExprPath(QPath::Resolved(_, ref iter_path)) = iter_args[0].node;
if let ExprPath(QPath::Resolved(_, ref len_path)) = len_args[0].node;
if iter_path.segments == len_path.segments;
then {
span_lint(cx,
RANGE_ZIP_WITH_LEN,
expr.span,
&format!("It is more idiomatic to use {}.iter().enumerate()",
snippet(cx, iter_args[0].span, "_")));
}
}
}
}
// exclusive range plus one: x..(y+1)
if_chain! {
if let Some(higher::Range { start, end: Some(end), limits: RangeLimits::HalfOpen }) = higher::range(cx, expr);
if let Some(y) = y_plus_one(end);
then {
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
RANGE_PLUS_ONE,
expr.span,
"an inclusive range would be more readable",
|db| {
let start = start.map_or("".to_owned(), |x| Sugg::hir(cx, x, "x").to_string());
let end = Sugg::hir(cx, y, "y");
db.span_suggestion(expr.span,
"use",
format!("{}..={}", start, end));
},
);
}
}
// inclusive range minus one: x..=(y-1)
if_chain! {
if let Some(higher::Range { start, end: Some(end), limits: RangeLimits::Closed }) = higher::range(cx, expr);
if let Some(y) = y_minus_one(end);
then {
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
RANGE_MINUS_ONE,
expr.span,
"an exclusive range would be more readable",
|db| {
let start = start.map_or("".to_owned(), |x| Sugg::hir(cx, x, "x").to_string());
let end = Sugg::hir(cx, y, "y");
db.span_suggestion(expr.span,
"use",
format!("{}..{}", start, end));
},
);
}
}
}
}
fn has_step_by(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) -> bool {
// No need for walk_ptrs_ty here because step_by moves self, so it
// can't be called on a borrowed range.
let ty = cx.tables.expr_ty_adjusted(expr);
2017-06-29 14:07:43 +00:00
get_trait_def_id(cx, &paths::ITERATOR).map_or(false, |iterator_trait| implements_trait(cx, ty, iterator_trait, &[]))
}
fn y_plus_one(expr: &Expr) -> Option<&Expr> {
match expr.node {
2017-11-04 19:55:56 +00:00
ExprBinary(Spanned { node: BiAdd, .. }, ref lhs, ref rhs) => if is_integer_literal(lhs, 1) {
Some(rhs)
} else if is_integer_literal(rhs, 1) {
Some(lhs)
} else {
None
},
_ => None,
}
}
fn y_minus_one(expr: &Expr) -> Option<&Expr> {
match expr.node {
ExprBinary(Spanned { node: BiSub, .. }, ref lhs, ref rhs) if is_integer_literal(rhs, 1) => Some(lhs),
_ => None,
}
}