rust-clippy/tests/ui/indexing_slicing_slice.rs

161 lines
3.4 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2018-07-28 15:34:52 +00:00
#![warn(clippy::indexing_slicing)]
// We also check the out_of_bounds_indexing lint here, because it lints similar things and
// we want to avoid false positives.
2018-07-28 15:34:52 +00:00
#![warn(clippy::out_of_bounds_indexing)]
2024-03-19 10:41:56 +00:00
#![allow(
clippy::no_effect,
clippy::unnecessary_operation,
clippy::useless_vec,
unused_must_use,
unused
)]
#![warn(clippy::indexing_slicing)]
use std::ops::Index;
struct BoolMap<T> {
false_value: T,
true_value: T,
}
impl<T> Index<bool> for BoolMap<T> {
type Output = T;
fn index(&self, index: bool) -> &T {
if index { &self.true_value } else { &self.false_value }
}
}
2015-12-21 18:22:29 +00:00
2024-03-19 10:41:56 +00:00
struct BoolMapWithGet<T> {
false_value: T,
true_value: T,
}
impl<T> Index<bool> for BoolMapWithGet<T> {
type Output = T;
fn index(&self, index: bool) -> &Self::Output {
if index { &self.true_value } else { &self.false_value }
}
}
impl<T> BoolMapWithGet<T> {
fn get(&self, index: bool) -> Option<&T> {
if index {
Some(&self.true_value)
} else {
Some(&self.false_value)
}
}
}
2024-03-27 10:13:27 +00:00
struct S<T>(T);
impl S<i32> {
fn get() -> Option<i32> {
unimplemented!()
}
}
impl<T> Index<i32> for S<T> {
type Output = T;
fn index(&self, _index: i32) -> &Self::Output {
&self.0
}
}
struct Y<T>(T);
impl Y<i32> {
fn get<U>() -> Option<U> {
unimplemented!()
}
}
impl<T> Index<i32> for Y<T> {
type Output = T;
fn index(&self, _index: i32) -> &Self::Output {
&self.0
}
}
struct Z<T>(T);
impl<T> Z<T> {
fn get<T2>() -> T2 {
todo!()
}
}
impl<T> Index<i32> for Z<T> {
type Output = T;
fn index(&self, _index: i32) -> &Self::Output {
&self.0
}
}
2015-12-21 18:22:29 +00:00
fn main() {
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 04:56:02 +00:00
let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];
let index: usize = 1;
let index_from: usize = 2;
let index_to: usize = 3;
&x[index..];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 04:56:02 +00:00
&x[..index];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
&x[index_from..index_to];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
&x[index_from..][..index_to];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
//~| ERROR: slicing may panic
&x[5..][..10];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
//~| ERROR: range is out of bounds
//~| NOTE: `-D clippy::out-of-bounds-indexing` implied by `-D warnings`
&x[0..][..3];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
&x[1..][..5];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
&x[0..].get(..3); // Ok, should not produce stderr.
&x[0..3]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
let y = &x;
2017-02-08 13:58:07 +00:00
&y[1..2];
2017-09-28 17:40:19 +00:00
&y[0..=4];
//~^ ERROR: range is out of bounds
2017-09-28 17:40:19 +00:00
&y[..=4];
//~^ ERROR: range is out of bounds
&y[..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 04:56:02 +00:00
let v = vec![0; 5];
&v[10..100];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
&x[10..][..100];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
//~| ERROR: range is out of bounds
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 04:56:02 +00:00
&v[10..];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
Extend `indexing_slicing` lint Hey there clippy team! I've made some assumptions in this PR and I'm not at all certain they'll look like the right approach to you. I'm looking forward to any feedback or revision requests you have, thanks! Prior to this commit the `indexing_slicing` lint was limited to indexing/slicing operations on arrays. This meant that the scope of a really useful lint didn't include vectors. In order to include vectors in the `indexing_slicing` lint a few steps were taken. The `array_indexing.rs` source file in `clippy_lints` was renamed to `indexing_slicing.rs` to more accurately reflect the lint's new scope. The `OUT_OF_BOUNDS_INDEXING` lint persists through these changes so if we can know that a constant index or slice on an array is in bounds no lint is triggered. The `array_indexing` tests in the `tests/ui` directory were also extended and moved to `indexing_slicing.rs` and `indexing_slicing.stderr`. The `indexing_slicing` lint was moved to the `clippy_pedantic` lint group. A specific "Consider using" string was added to each of the `indexing_slicing` lint reports. At least one of the test scenarios might look peculiar and I'll leave it up to y'all to decide if it's palatable. It's the result of indexing the array `x` after `let x = [1, 2, 3, 4];` ``` error: slicing may panic. Consider using `.get(..n)`or `.get_mut(..n)`instead --> $DIR/indexing_slicing.rs:23:6 | 23 | &x[0..][..3]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` The error string reports only on the second half's range-to, because the range-from is in bounds! Again, thanks for taking a look. Closes #2536
2018-05-23 04:56:02 +00:00
&v[..100];
//~^ ERROR: slicing may panic
&v[..]; // Ok, should not produce stderr.
let map = BoolMap {
false_value: 2,
true_value: 4,
};
map[true]; // Ok, because `get` does not exist (custom indexing)
2024-03-19 10:41:56 +00:00
let map_with_get = BoolMapWithGet {
false_value: 2,
true_value: 4,
};
// Lint on this, because `get` does exist with same signature
map_with_get[true];
2024-03-27 10:13:27 +00:00
let s = S::<i32>(1);
s[0];
let y = Y::<i32>(1);
y[0];
let z = Z::<i32>(1);
z[0];
2015-12-21 18:22:29 +00:00
}