rust-clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs

418 lines
12 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

mod builtin_type_shadow;
mod double_neg;
mod literal_suffix;
mod mixed_case_hex_literals;
mod redundant_pattern;
mod unneeded_field_pattern;
mod unneeded_wildcard_pattern;
mod zero_prefixed_literal;
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint;
use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt;
use rustc_ast::ast::{Expr, ExprKind, Generics, LitFloatType, LitIntType, LitKind, NodeId, Pat, PatKind};
use rustc_ast::token;
use rustc_ast::visit::FnKind;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
2021-12-04 15:09:15 +00:00
use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass, LintContext};
use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
use rustc_span::source_map::Span;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for structure field patterns bound to wildcards.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Using `..` instead is shorter and leaves the focus on
/// the fields that are actually bound.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # struct Foo {
/// # a: i32,
/// # b: i32,
/// # c: i32,
/// # }
/// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 };
///
/// match f {
/// Foo { a: _, b: 0, .. } => {},
/// Foo { a: _, b: _, c: _ } => {},
/// }
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # struct Foo {
/// # a: i32,
/// # b: i32,
/// # c: i32,
/// # }
/// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 };
///
/// match f {
/// Foo { b: 0, .. } => {},
/// Foo { .. } => {},
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN,
restriction,
"struct fields bound to a wildcard instead of using `..`"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for function arguments having the similar names
/// differing by an underscore.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// It affects code readability.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// fn foo(a: i32, _a: i32) {}
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// fn bar(a: i32, _b: i32) {}
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT,
style,
"function arguments having names which only differ by an underscore"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Detects expressions of the form `--x`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// It can mislead C/C++ programmers to think `x` was
/// decremented.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// let mut x = 3;
/// --x;
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub DOUBLE_NEG,
style,
"`--x`, which is a double negation of `x` and not a pre-decrement as in C/C++"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Warns on hexadecimal literals with mixed-case letter
/// digits.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// It looks confusing.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # let _ =
/// 0x1a9BAcD
/// # ;
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # let _ =
/// 0x1A9BACD
/// # ;
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub MIXED_CASE_HEX_LITERALS,
style,
"hex literals whose letter digits are not consistently upper- or lowercased"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Warns if literal suffixes are not separated by an
/// underscore.
/// To enforce unseparated literal suffix style,
/// see the `separated_literal_suffix` lint.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Suffix style should be consistent.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # let _ =
/// 123832i32
/// # ;
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # let _ =
/// 123832_i32
/// # ;
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub UNSEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
restriction,
"literals whose suffix is not separated by an underscore"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Warns if literal suffixes are separated by an underscore.
/// To enforce separated literal suffix style,
/// see the `unseparated_literal_suffix` lint.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Suffix style should be consistent.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # let _ =
/// 123832_i32
/// # ;
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # let _ =
/// 123832i32
/// # ;
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.58.0"]
pub SEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
restriction,
"literals whose suffix is separated by an underscore"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Warns if an integral constant literal starts with `0`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// In some languages (including the infamous C language
/// and most of its
/// family), this marks an octal constant. In Rust however, this is a decimal
/// constant. This could
/// be confusing for both the writer and a reader of the constant.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// In Rust:
/// ```rust
/// fn main() {
/// let a = 0123;
/// println!("{}", a);
/// }
/// ```
///
/// prints `123`, while in C:
///
/// ```c
/// #include <stdio.h>
///
/// int main() {
/// int a = 0123;
/// printf("%d\n", a);
/// }
/// ```
///
/// prints `83` (as `83 == 0o123` while `123 == 0o173`).
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub ZERO_PREFIXED_LITERAL,
complexity,
"integer literals starting with `0`"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Warns if a generic shadows a built-in type.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// This gives surprising type errors.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```ignore
/// impl<u32> Foo<u32> {
/// fn impl_func(&self) -> u32 {
/// 42
/// }
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub BUILTIN_TYPE_SHADOW,
style,
"shadowing a builtin type"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for patterns in the form `name @ _`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// It's almost always more readable to just use direct
/// bindings.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # let v = Some("abc");
/// match v {
/// Some(x) => (),
/// y @ _ => (),
/// }
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # let v = Some("abc");
/// match v {
/// Some(x) => (),
/// y => (),
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
pub REDUNDANT_PATTERN,
style,
"using `name @ _` in a pattern"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for tuple patterns with a wildcard
/// pattern (`_`) is next to a rest pattern (`..`).
///
/// _NOTE_: While `_, ..` means there is at least one element left, `..`
/// means there are 0 or more elements left. This can make a difference
/// when refactoring, but shouldn't result in errors in the refactored code,
/// since the wildcard pattern isn't used anyway.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// The wildcard pattern is unneeded as the rest pattern
/// can match that element as well.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # struct TupleStruct(u32, u32, u32);
/// # let t = TupleStruct(1, 2, 3);
/// match t {
/// TupleStruct(0, .., _) => (),
/// _ => (),
/// }
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// # struct TupleStruct(u32, u32, u32);
/// # let t = TupleStruct(1, 2, 3);
/// match t {
/// TupleStruct(0, ..) => (),
/// _ => (),
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.40.0"]
pub UNNEEDED_WILDCARD_PATTERN,
complexity,
"tuple patterns with a wildcard pattern (`_`) is next to a rest pattern (`..`)"
}
declare_lint_pass!(MiscEarlyLints => [
UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN,
DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT,
DOUBLE_NEG,
MIXED_CASE_HEX_LITERALS,
UNSEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
SEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
ZERO_PREFIXED_LITERAL,
BUILTIN_TYPE_SHADOW,
REDUNDANT_PATTERN,
UNNEEDED_WILDCARD_PATTERN,
]);
impl EarlyLintPass for MiscEarlyLints {
fn check_generics(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, gen: &Generics) {
for param in &gen.params {
builtin_type_shadow::check(cx, param);
}
}
fn check_pat(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, pat: &Pat) {
unneeded_field_pattern::check(cx, pat);
redundant_pattern::check(cx, pat);
unneeded_wildcard_pattern::check(cx, pat);
}
fn check_fn(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, fn_kind: FnKind<'_>, _: Span, _: NodeId) {
let mut registered_names: FxHashMap<String, Span> = FxHashMap::default();
for arg in &fn_kind.decl().inputs {
if let PatKind::Ident(_, ident, None) = arg.pat.kind {
let arg_name = ident.to_string();
if let Some(arg_name) = arg_name.strip_prefix('_') {
if let Some(correspondence) = registered_names.get(arg_name) {
span_lint(
cx,
DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT,
*correspondence,
&format!(
"`{arg_name}` already exists, having another argument having almost the same \
name makes code comprehension and documentation more difficult"
),
);
}
} else {
registered_names.insert(arg_name, arg.pat.span);
}
}
}
}
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, expr: &Expr) {
2021-12-04 15:09:15 +00:00
if in_external_macro(cx.sess(), expr.span) {
return;
}
if let ExprKind::Lit(lit) = expr.kind {
MiscEarlyLints::check_lit(cx, lit, expr.span);
}
double_neg::check(cx, expr);
}
}
impl MiscEarlyLints {
fn check_lit(cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, lit: token::Lit, span: Span) {
// We test if first character in snippet is a number, because the snippet could be an expansion
// from a built-in macro like `line!()` or a proc-macro like `#[wasm_bindgen]`.
// Note that this check also covers special case that `line!()` is eagerly expanded by compiler.
// See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4507> for a regression.
// FIXME: Find a better way to detect those cases.
let lit_snip = match snippet_opt(cx, span) {
Some(snip) if snip.chars().next().map_or(false, |c| c.is_ascii_digit()) => snip,
_ => return,
};
let lit_kind = LitKind::from_token_lit(lit);
if let Ok(LitKind::Int(value, lit_int_type)) = lit_kind {
let suffix = match lit_int_type {
LitIntType::Signed(ty) => ty.name_str(),
LitIntType::Unsigned(ty) => ty.name_str(),
LitIntType::Unsuffixed => "",
};
literal_suffix::check(cx, span, &lit_snip, suffix, "integer");
if lit_snip.starts_with("0x") {
mixed_case_hex_literals::check(cx, span, suffix, &lit_snip);
} else if lit_snip.starts_with("0b") || lit_snip.starts_with("0o") {
// nothing to do
} else if value != 0 && lit_snip.starts_with('0') {
zero_prefixed_literal::check(cx, span, &lit_snip);
}
} else if let Ok(LitKind::Float(_, LitFloatType::Suffixed(float_ty))) = lit_kind {
let suffix = float_ty.name_str();
literal_suffix::check(cx, span, &lit_snip, suffix, "float");
}
}
}